Abstract
This chapter examines the apparent paradox of French deportation policy: although thousands of undocumented migrants are arrested and detained for deportation, the process often goes uncompleted, as most migrants are never actually deported. But the failure to deport is not the failure of the deportation policy. Drawing on ethnographic data collected between 2006 and 2013 among undocumented migrants who remained in France after at least one detention period, I explore how this policy affects the lives of undocumented migrants. I argue that deportation and the threat of deportation are two sides of the same policy, which is, among other things, about population control, achieved by slowing down movement and confining people on both sides of the border.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The possibility to deport foreigners entered the French criminal code in 1832 and the power to proceed to such removals from the national territory was given to the préfets in 1849.
- 2.
All the names I employ in this chapter have been changed in order to preserve the anonymity of my interlocutors and the sensitive information they provided.
- 3.
I employ the term device as a translation of the French dispositif, a heterogeneous assemblage of laws, practices, discourses (Foucault 1994 [1977], p. 299).
- 4.
I employ the term undocumented in order to emphasize the absence of documents, considered as “powerful” material artifacts (Riles 2006). Sometimes I use the word unauthorized in order to stress individuals’ non-conformity with bureaucratic standards, in the same way as the French expression étranger en situation irrégulière.
- 5.
For a reflection on the ethical tensions and difficulties related to this double commitment in the field, see Le Courant (2013).
- 6.
In the following pages, I will mostly use masculine pronouns when describing the actions of a singular unauthorized migrant. As men are the main targets of immigration detention policy—because of the stereotype of a migrant being a single (young) man—most of the undocumented migrants who are arrested and deported are men, and most of my interlocutors are men as well. The data I was able to gather on women’s experiences show that although women use different strategies to obtain legalization and to stay in France, the effects of the deportation device are very similar on both genders.
- 7.
The distinction between undocumented migrants and clandestine migrants is acknowledged by the government. In a parliamentary report it can be read that: “Not all the undocumented migrants are clandestine migrants. Only those who have never had anything to do with the administration.” Sénat, Immigration clandestine: une réalité inacceptable, une réponse ferme, juste et humaine, April 2006, n°300 p. 19.
- 8.
Since 2006, the Eloi database has collected information on individuals subject to an expulsion order. Since 2009, the Oscar database has stocked information on the beneficiaries of return aid. In 2008, the European Return Directive introduced the compulsory incorporation of the names of deported individuals and their biometric identifiers into the Schengen information system (SIS) to make the entry ban effective in the EU for a period of five years.
- 9.
References
Auyero, Javier. 2011. Patients of the State: An Ethnographic Account of Poor People’s Waiting. Latin American Research Review 46 (1): 5–29.
Balibar, Etienne. 2012. L’introuvable humanité du sujet moderne. L’Homme 203–204 (3): 19–50.
Barron, Pierre, Anne Bory, Sebastien Chauvin, Nicolas Jounin, and Luci Tourette. 2011. On bosse ici, on reste ici ! La grève des sans-papiers: une aventure inédite. Paris: La Découverte.
Boehm, Deborah A. 2012. Intimate Migrations. Gender, Family, and Illegality among Transnational Mexicans. New York: New York University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Le Seuil.
Broeders, Dennis. 2009. Breaking Down Anonimity: Digital Surveillance of Irregular Migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univesity Press.
Chu, Julie Y. 2010. Cosmologies of Credit: Transnational Mobility and the Politics of Destination in China. Durham: Duke University Press.
Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2006 [2000]. Legalizing Moves: Salvadorian Immigrants’ Struggle for U.S. Residency. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.
De Genova, Nicholas. 2002. Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.
De Genova, Nicholas, and Nathalie Peutz, eds. 2010. The Deportation Regime. Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Fassin, Didier. 2011. Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries: The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 213–226.
———. 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fischer, Nicolas, and Chowra Makaremi. 2012. ‘L’horreur de la République’: Les enjeux moraux de l’enfermement des étrangers. In Economies morales contemporaines, ed. Didier Fassin and Jean-Sebastien Eideliman, 217–241. Paris: La Découverte.
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
———. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France. 1978–1979. Paris: Gallimard / Seuil.
Heyman, Josiah McC. 1998. State Effects on Labor Exploitation: The INS Undocumented Immigrants as the Mexico-United States Border. Critique of Anthropology 18 (2): 157–180.
Iana Mar. 2011. Travailleurs, vos papiers ! Paris: Libertalia.
Kobelinsky, Carolina. 2010. L’accueil des demandeurs d’asile. Une ethnographie de l’attente. Paris: Editions du Cygne.
Le Courant, Stefan. 2013. What Can We Learn from a ‘Liar’ and a ‘Madman’? Serendipity and Double Commitment During Fieldwork. Social Anthropology 21 (2): 186–198.
Mbodj-Pouye, Aissatou, and Stefan Le Courant. 2017. “Living Away from Family Is Not Good but Living with It Is Worse.” Debating Conjugality Across Generations of West African Migrants in France. Mande Studies 19: 109–130.
Moulier-Boutang, Y. 1997. Une forme contemporaine du salariat bride. In Les lois de l’inhospitalité: Les politiques de l’immigration à l’épreuve des sans-papier, ed. Didier Fassin, Alain Morice, and Catherine Quiminal, 127–143. Paris: La Découverte.
Peutz, Nathalie. 2006. Embarking on an Anthropology of Removal. Current Anthropology 47 (2): 217–241.
Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006. Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sassen, Saskia. 2016. Expulsions: Brutalité et complexité dans l’économie globale. Paris: Gallimard.
Sayad, Abdelmalek. 1999. La double absence: Des illusions de l’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré. Paris: Seuil.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Terray, Emmanuel. 1999. Le travail des étrangers en situation irrégulière ou la délocalisation sur place. In Sans-papiers: l’archaïsme fatal, ed. Etienne Balibar, Monique Chemillier-Grendeau, Jacqueline Costa-Lascoux, and Emmanuel Terray, 9–34. Paris: La Découverte.
Ticktin, Miriam. 2011. Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Le Courant, S. (2020). Expulsion or Differential Inclusion? Governing Undocumented Migrants in France. In: McKowen, K., Borneman, J. (eds) Digesting Difference . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49597-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)