Skip to main content

Expulsion or Differential Inclusion? Governing Undocumented Migrants in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digesting Difference

Part of the book series: Global Diversities ((GLODIV))

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the apparent paradox of French deportation policy: although thousands of undocumented migrants are arrested and detained for deportation, the process often goes uncompleted, as most migrants are never actually deported. But the failure to deport is not the failure of the deportation policy. Drawing on ethnographic data collected between 2006 and 2013 among undocumented migrants who remained in France after at least one detention period, I explore how this policy affects the lives of undocumented migrants. I argue that deportation and the threat of deportation are two sides of the same policy, which is, among other things, about population control, achieved by slowing down movement and confining people on both sides of the border.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The possibility to deport foreigners entered the French criminal code in 1832 and the power to proceed to such removals from the national territory was given to the préfets in 1849.

  2. 2.

    All the names I employ in this chapter have been changed in order to preserve the anonymity of my interlocutors and the sensitive information they provided.

  3. 3.

    I employ the term device as a translation of the French dispositif, a heterogeneous assemblage of laws, practices, discourses (Foucault 1994 [1977], p. 299).

  4. 4.

    I employ the term undocumented in order to emphasize the absence of documents, considered as “powerful” material artifacts (Riles 2006). Sometimes I use the word unauthorized in order to stress individuals’ non-conformity with bureaucratic standards, in the same way as the French expression étranger en situation irrégulière.

  5. 5.

    For a reflection on the ethical tensions and difficulties related to this double commitment in the field, see Le Courant (2013).

  6. 6.

    In the following pages, I will mostly use masculine pronouns when describing the actions of a singular unauthorized migrant. As men are the main targets of immigration detention policy—because of the stereotype of a migrant being a single (young) man—most of the undocumented migrants who are arrested and deported are men, and most of my interlocutors are men as well. The data I was able to gather on women’s experiences show that although women use different strategies to obtain legalization and to stay in France, the effects of the deportation device are very similar on both genders.

  7. 7.

    The distinction between undocumented migrants and clandestine migrants is acknowledged by the government. In a parliamentary report it can be read that: “Not all the undocumented migrants are clandestine migrants. Only those who have never had anything to do with the administration.” Sénat, Immigration clandestine: une réalité inacceptable, une réponse ferme, juste et humaine, April 2006, n°300 p. 19.

  8. 8.

    Since 2006, the Eloi database has collected information on individuals subject to an expulsion order. Since 2009, the Oscar database has stocked information on the beneficiaries of return aid. In 2008, the European Return Directive introduced the compulsory incorporation of the names of deported individuals and their biometric identifiers into the Schengen information system (SIS) to make the entry ban effective in the EU for a period of five years.

  9. 9.

    In April 2008, a strike of “sans-papiers” (undocumented migrants) started with the support of trade unions. The specificity of this movement is related to the wish to obtain the papers through the recognition of the “undocumented worker” status (Barron et al. 2011; Iana Mar 2011).

References

  • Auyero, Javier. 2011. Patients of the State: An Ethnographic Account of Poor People’s Waiting. Latin American Research Review 46 (1): 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, Etienne. 2012. L’introuvable humanité du sujet moderne. L’Homme 203–204 (3): 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, Pierre, Anne Bory, Sebastien Chauvin, Nicolas Jounin, and Luci Tourette. 2011. On bosse ici, on reste ici ! La grève des sans-papiers: une aventure inédite. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Deborah A. 2012. Intimate Migrations. Gender, Family, and Illegality among Transnational Mexicans. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broeders, Dennis. 2009. Breaking Down Anonimity: Digital Surveillance of Irregular Migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univesity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Julie Y. 2010. Cosmologies of Credit: Transnational Mobility and the Politics of Destination in China. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2006 [2000]. Legalizing Moves: Salvadorian Immigrants’ Struggle for U.S. Residency. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicholas. 2002. Migrant ‘Illegality’ and Deportability in Everyday Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicholas, and Nathalie Peutz, eds. 2010. The Deportation Regime. Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Didier. 2011. Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries: The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Nicolas, and Chowra Makaremi. 2012. ‘L’horreur de la République’: Les enjeux moraux de l’enfermement des étrangers. In Economies morales contemporaines, ed. Didier Fassin and Jean-Sebastien Eideliman, 217–241. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France. 1978–1979. Paris: Gallimard / Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, Josiah McC. 1998. State Effects on Labor Exploitation: The INS Undocumented Immigrants as the Mexico-United States Border. Critique of Anthropology 18 (2): 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iana Mar. 2011. Travailleurs, vos papiers ! Paris: Libertalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobelinsky, Carolina. 2010. L’accueil des demandeurs d’asile. Une ethnographie de l’attente. Paris: Editions du Cygne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Courant, Stefan. 2013. What Can We Learn from a ‘Liar’ and a ‘Madman’? Serendipity and Double Commitment During Fieldwork. Social Anthropology 21 (2): 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbodj-Pouye, Aissatou, and Stefan Le Courant. 2017. “Living Away from Family Is Not Good but Living with It Is Worse.” Debating Conjugality Across Generations of West African Migrants in France. Mande Studies 19: 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulier-Boutang, Y. 1997. Une forme contemporaine du salariat bride. In Les lois de l’inhospitalité: Les politiques de l’immigration à l’épreuve des sans-papier, ed. Didier Fassin, Alain Morice, and Catherine Quiminal, 127–143. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peutz, Nathalie. 2006. Embarking on an Anthropology of Removal. Current Anthropology 47 (2): 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006. Documents: Artefacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2016. Expulsions: Brutalité et complexité dans l’économie globale. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayad, Abdelmalek. 1999. La double absence: Des illusions de l’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terray, Emmanuel. 1999. Le travail des étrangers en situation irrégulière ou la délocalisation sur place. In Sans-papiers: l’archaïsme fatal, ed. Etienne Balibar, Monique Chemillier-Grendeau, Jacqueline Costa-Lascoux, and Emmanuel Terray, 9–34. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticktin, Miriam. 2011. Casualties of Care: Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Le Courant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Le Courant, S. (2020). Expulsion or Differential Inclusion? Governing Undocumented Migrants in France. In: McKowen, K., Borneman, J. (eds) Digesting Difference . Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49597-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49598-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics