An Exploration of a Social Media Community: The Case of #AcademicTwitter

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12195)


Online professional communities on Twitter are increasingly gaining attention among users due to benefits such as knowledge sharing, professional development, and relationship building. Millions of hashtags are used every day in different disciplines (e.g., #educhat) or everyday situations (e.g. #MondayMotivation). Hashtags have led to the creation of conversations about topics (e.g., #highered), serving as a point of connection among different types of users. In the academic world, the hashtag #AcademicTwitter has evolved into an online community of educators, graduate students, organizations, and others engaged in the discussion of topics and issues related to academic life, funny moments, and survival stories. This paper examines participants and communication patterns in the #AcademicTwitter community. Using content analysis and social network analysis techniques, the researchers examined tweets including the #AcademicTwitter hashtag to discover the community’s network properties, roles of the participants, sentiment, and conversational themes. Findings indicated that the conversation was not centered on one topic, instead several micro-communities were found. Top participants in the #AcademicTwitter community were educators, media platforms, and other professionals which centered on conversations related to topics such as accessibility, academic life experiences, and teaching and research support. The study of social media in academic professional settings is still new. Our work contributes to the literature of social networks in academia, helping better understand how users connect and the network that supports the #AcademicTwitter community.


AcademicTwitter Online professional communities Teaching Education Social media 


  1. 1.
    Malik, A., Heyman-Schrum, C., Johri, A.: Use of Twitter across educational settings: a review of the literature. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16(36) (2019).
  2. 2.
    Xing, W., Gao, F.: Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Vis. Commun. Technol. Educ. Fac. Publ. 47 (2018).
  3. 3.
    Rosell-Aguilar, F.: Twitter: a professional development and community of practice tool for teachers. J. Interact. Media Educ. 6(1), 1–12 (2018)., Accessed 21 Nov 2016
  4. 4.
    Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Paulin, D., Gilbert, S., Esteve Del Valle, M.: Uses and Gratifications factors for social media use in teaching: instructors’ perspectives. New Media Soc. 20(2), 475–494 (2018). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duncan-Howell, J.: Teachers making connections: online communities as a source of professional learning. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 41(2), 324–340 (2010). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wright, G.: The weird and wonderful world of academic Twitter (2015). Accessed 15 Aug 2019
  7. 7.
    Koehler, M.J., Rosenberg, J.M.: What factors matter for engaging others in an educational conversation about Twitter? In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference, Washington, D.C. (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fullan, M.: The role of leadership in the promotion of knowledge management in schools. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 8(3/4), 409–419 (2002). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talbert, J.E.: Professional learning communities at the crossroads: how systems hinder or engender change. In: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., Hopkins, D. (eds.) Second International Handbook of Educational Change, pp. 555–571. Springer, Dordrecht (2010). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho, V., Ro, J., Littenberg-Tobias, J.: What Twitter will and will not do: theorizing about teachers’ online professional communities. LEARNing Landscapes 6(2), 45–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pew Research Center, Social Media Fact Sheet. Demographics of social media users and adoptions in the United States. Pew Research Center. Accessed 15 Jan 2020
  12. 12.
    Romero-Hall, E.: Social Media in higher education: enriching graduate students’ professional growth outside the classroom. In: Şad, S.N., Ebner, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Digital Tools for Seamless Learning. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greenhalgh, S., Koehler, M.: 28 Days later: Twitter hashtags as ‘Just in Time’ teacher professional development. TechTrends Link. Res. Pract. Improve Learn. 61(3), 273–281 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rashid, M.A., McKechnie, D., Gill, D.: What advice is given to newly qualified doctors on Twitter? An analysis of #TipsForNewDocs tweets. Med. Educ. 52(7), 747–756 (2018). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staudt Willet, K.B.: Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: tweet types and purposes in #Edchat. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 51(3), 273–289 (2019). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veletsianos, G.: Three cases of hashtags used as learning and professional development environments. TechTrends Link. Res. Pract. Improve Learn. 61(3), 284–292 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gomez, L., Waters, R.: #PRProfs Twitter community: a social network approach. In: Yook, B., Fay Chen, Z. (eds.) Proceedings 22nd International Public Relations Research, Orlando, Florida, pp. 130–141 (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R.: Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: how do education professors and students use Twitter? Internet High. Educ. 30, 1–10 (2016). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coleman, J.M., Rice, M.L., Wright, V.H.: Educator communities of practice on Twitter. J. Interact. Online Learn. 16(1), 80–96 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Donelan, H.: Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. J. Furth. High. Educ. 40(5), 706–729 (2016). Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tattersall, A.: Many a true word is spoken in jest: Twitter accounts that mock, self-ridicule and bring a smile to academia (2016). Accessed 14 Jan 2020
  22. 22.
    Romero-Hall, E.: Posting, sharing, networking, and connecting: use of social media content by graduate students. TechTrends 61(6), 580–588 (2017). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Netlytic Homepage. Accessed 24 Jan 2020
  24. 24.
    Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C.: Enabling community through social media. J. Med. Res. 15(10) (2013).
  25. 25.
    Hawe, P., Webster, C., Shiell, A.: A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J. Epidemial Community Health 58, 971–975 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahn, Y.Y., Han, S., Kwak, H., Moon, S., Jeong, H.: Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, Banff, Canada, pp. 835–844 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bruns, A., Burgess, J.: The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In: Proceedings 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., Takhteyev, Y.: Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. Am. Behav. Sci. 55(10), 1294–1318 (2011). Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu, W.W., Chiu, I.-H., Chen, Y., Mukherjee, T.: Twitter hashtags for health: applying network and content analyses to understand the health knowledge sharing in a Twitter-based community of practice. Qual. Quant. 49(4), 1361–1380 (2015). Scholar
  31. 31.
    Graham Mackenzie, D.: Improving the quality and impact of public health social media activity in Scotland during 2016: #ScotPublicHealth. J. Public Health, 1–6 (2017).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TampaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations