Skip to main content

The Impact of Innovative Working Behaviour on Employees’ Working Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to identify the relationship and the impact of innovative working behaviour (IWB) of employees on their performance. With innovative working behaviour, we are trying to analyse the initiative taken from employees for improving work and the effects over working performance (WP). Employees with a higher level of innovative behaviour are expected to be star performers in their working place. An organisation needs to increase the awareness of the importance of innovative working behaviour of their employee in working activity. The sample includes 214 respondents from the private and public sector in Macedonia. Based on our findings, we provide some useful recommendation to organisations to raise the awareness of innovation that comes from employee side. The chapter ends with study limitations and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on Prespa Agreement, reached on June 17, 2018, by Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras and his Macedonian counterpart, Zoran Zaev, the Republic of Macedonia should change its name to the Republic of North Macedonia. At the moment when this chapter was submitted to the editors/publisher (Friday, January 11, 2019), the Parliament of the Republic of Macedonia with 81 votes approved and passed all amendments to the constitution to rename the country to Republic of North Macedonia. Now this agreement should be approved by the Greek Parliament in order to be effective.

References

  • Andrew, H., & de Ven, V. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation, management science. Organization Design, 32(5), 590–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. H. (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. The Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 803–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berisha, B. (2015), The effects of emotional intelligence in managing changes., Master Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, L. P., & Dana, T. E. (2005). Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., & Hartog, N. D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, J., & Hartog, N. D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2018). Innovative work behaviour and performance-related pay: Rewarding the individual or the collective? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(12), 1900–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorenbosch, L. W., Van Engen, M. L., & Verhagen, M. (2005). On-the-job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, N., Gassmann, O., & Morhart, F. (2012). Innovative work behavior: The roles of employee expectations and effects on job performance (Doctoral dissertation). St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, F., & Ford, C. (1990). Individual Innovation. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organisational strategies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23(2), 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greg, R. O., & Anne, C. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, L. B., et al. (2014). Changing work and work family conflict: Evidence from the work, family, and health network. American Sociological Review, 79(3), 485–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, H. Y., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort reward fairness and innovation work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(1), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, T. C., & Rasly, A. (2014). The relationship between innovative work behavior on work role performance: An empirical study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129(1), 592–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, R. (2011). Leading with emotional intelligence: Hands-on strategies for building confident and collaborative star performers (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peus, C., Frey, D., Gerkhardt, M., Fischer, P., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2009). Leading and managing organizational change initiatives. Management Review, 20(2), 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, A. N., Knippenberg, D. V., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. A. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani, V., Hisrich, D. R., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L.-P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(C), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadani, V., Rexhepi, G., Dana, L.-P., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., & Ratten, V. (2018). Entrepreneurship in Macedonia. In R. Palalić, L.-P. Dana, & V. Ramadani (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in former Yugoslavia (pp. 67–89). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rexhepi, G., & Berisha, B. (2017). The effects of emotional intelligence in employees’ performance. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(4), 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, C. L., & Kinicki, A. J. (2000). Identifying the antecedents of coping with an organizational acquisition: A structural assessment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(1), 627–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Statistical Office of the Republic of Macedonia. (2016). Macedonia in figures. Skopje: Government of Republic of Macedonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuominen, T., & Toivonen, M. (2011). Studying innovation and change activities in KIBS through the lens of innovative behaviour. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(02), 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1993). Admission of the State whose application is contained in document A/47/876-S/25147 to membership in the United Nations [online]. Retrieved November 22, 2012 from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/47/a47r225.htm

  • Weeks, J. W., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Hart, T. A., Turk, C. L., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2005). Empirical validation and psychometric evaluation of the brief fear of negative evaluation scale in patients with social anxiety disorder. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (1987). A measure of role innovation at work. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., John, E. S., & Ricky, W. G. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F. R., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veland Ramadani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berisha, B., Ramadani, V., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., Palalić, R. (2020). The Impact of Innovative Working Behaviour on Employees’ Working Performance. In: Leitão, J., Nunes, A., Pereira, D., Ramadani, V. (eds) Intrapreneurship and Sustainable Human Capital. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49410-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics