Skip to main content

The Environmental Sustainability of the Music Industries

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the environmental sustainability of the music industries. A world where music does not have an environmental impact is a world without music. I do not want a world without music, and it is not my intention to ruin one of life’s great pleasures – the enjoyment of music – by pointing out its environmental impact. But music can be framed not just in terms of its value, but also its cost - including the whole range of production and consumption behaviours that those who participate in music often take for granted. This chapter therefore explores three key sectors of the music industries – recorded music, live music, and musical instruments – and considers them from the perspective of environmental sustainability and political ecology. It also offers a critique of the assumption that the growth of these industries is an unquestionable good.

Keywords

  • Music
  • Musical instruments
  • Recording
  • Waste

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49384-4_4
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-49384-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 4.1
Fig. 4.2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that my approach to live music ecology stands in contrast to that of Huib Schippers and the Sustainable Futures for Music Cultures Project funded by the Australian Research Council. Schippers does not place a similar emphasis on materiality, interdependence, and sustainability in his theorization of musical ecosystems. He also uses the term ‘sustainability’ in a different sense, focusing on the sustainability of musical cultures as intangible cultural heritage rather than any concerns relating directly to environmental sustainability (see Schippers 2015).

  2. 2.

    Julie’s Bicycle presentation slides for Fields of Green roundtable workshop, 16 October 2015.

  3. 3.

    Economic costs were researched by Matt Brennan with assistance from Paul Archibald (methodology, sources, datasets published in Brennan and Archibald 2019). Environmental costs were researched by Kyle Devine (methodology, sources, and datasets published in Devine 2019).

  4. 4.

    This can be evidenced by reading through trade publications such as Music Trades from the turn of the twentieth century.

References

  • Allen, A., and K. Dawe, eds. 2016. Current directions in ecomusicology: music, nature, and environment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, A., M. Brennan, and M. Cloonan. 2014. Cultural value and cultural policy: Some evidence from the world of live music. International Journal of Cultural Policy 22 (3): 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2014.987668.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, A., M. Brennan, M. Cloonan, S. Frith, and E. Webster. 2016. Live concert performance: An ecological approach. Rock Music Studies 3 (1): 5–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrill, C., G. Lye, M. Boykoff, and D. Liverman. 2008. First steps: UK music industry greenhouse gas emissions for 2007. Oxford: Julie’s Bicycle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., and Devine, K. 2019. Music streaming has a far worse carbon footprint than the heyday of records and CDs. The Conversation 8 April. https://theconversation.com/music-streaming-has-a-far-worse-carbon-footprint-than-the-heyday-of-records-and-cds-new-findings-114944. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  • Brennan, M. 2019. Kick it: A social history of the drum kit. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. The infrastructure and environmental consequences of live music. In Audible infrastructures: Music, sound, media, ed. K. Devine and A. Boudreault-Fournier. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., and P. Archibald. 2019. The economic cost of recorded music: Findings, datasets, sources, and methods. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/183249/. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., and K. Devine. 2020. The cost of music. Pop Music 39 (1): 43–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M., J. Collinson Scott, A. Connelly, and G. Lawrence. 2019. Do music festival communities address environmental sustainability and how? A Scottish case study. Pop Music 38 (2): 252–275.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, K. 2015. Decomposed: A political ecology of music. Pop Music 34 (3): 367–389.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Decomposed: The political ecology of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hodenfield, J. 1969. Woodstock: ‘It Was Like Balling for the First Time’. Rolling Stone, 20 September. https://wwwrollingstonecom/music/music-features/woodstock-it-was-like-balling-for-the-first-time-229092/. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

  • Holden, J. 2015. The ecology of culture: A report commissioned by the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s Cultural Value Project. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. 2016. Global Music Report. https://www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf.

  • Music, U.K. 2019. Music by numbers. London: UK Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Music Merchants. 2016. NAMM Global Report. Carlsbad: NAMM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, G. 2008. The drum book: A history of the rock drum kit. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orozco, J.G., J. Jones, and S. Shapiro. 2018. White paper on music and tourism: Music is the new gastronomy. Bogota: Sound Diplomacy and ProColumbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedelty, M. 2012. Ecomusicology: Rock, folk, and the environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse Cooper. 2015. Outlook insights: An analysis of the Global entertainment and media outlook 2015–2019. London: Price Waterhouse Cooper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, D. 2018. The live music industry will be worth $31 billion worldwide by 2022. Digital Music News, 26 October. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2018/10/26/latest-live-music-revenue-31-billion-2022/. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

  • Schippers, H. 2015. Applied ethnomusicology and intangible cultural heritage: Understanding ‘ecosystems of music’ as a tool for sustainability. In Oxford handbook of applied ethnomusicology, ed. S. Pettan and J.T. Titon, 134–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, E., M. Brennan, A. Behr, M. Cloonan, and J. Ansell. 2018. Valuing live music: The UK live music census 2017 report. Edinburgh: Live Music Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. New York: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matt Brennan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brennan, M. (2020). The Environmental Sustainability of the Music Industries. In: Oakley, K., Banks, M. (eds) Cultural Industries and the Environmental Crisis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49384-4_4

Download citation