Skip to main content

Noneczematous Contact Dermatitis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

Irritant and allergic contact dermatitis usually presents as an eczematous process, clinically characterized by polymorphic lesions that vary according to the clinical phase, acute, subacute or chronic. Besides classic eczematous forms, however, different noneczematous clinical variants are possible. Of all the noneczematous variants, erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis is the most common. Prevalently caused by woods, plants, and medicaments, the eruption presents with target-like, erythemato-vesicular, or urticarial lesions that may also extend to the whole cutaneous surface. The most frequent causative agents of purpuric contact dermatitis are rubber, textiles, plants and others. The eruption presents with palpable purpuric elements that evolve slowly and are followed by a variably intense and persistent pigmentation. The histopathology shows the signs of leukocytoclastic vasculitis with erytrocytes extravasation. Lichenoid contact dermatitis is an uncommon form that presents with clinical features resembling those of lichen planus: papulous lesions featuring a peculiar lilac-red hue. Lyphomatoid contact dermatitis can be defined as a benign pseudolymphomatous allergic contact dermatitis with clinical and histological features suggestive of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. It manifests with clinical features of plaque parapsoriasis. Pigmented contact dermatitis is usually observed in dark phototypes with skin hyperpigmentation due to contact with azoic dyes. Chemical leukoderma, often clinically mimicking idiopathic vitiligo, is an acquired form of cutaneous pigment loss caused by exposure to a variety of melanocytotoxic chemicals. Dyshidrosiform contact dermatitis can be primitive (expression of systemic contact dermatitis) or secondary (a contact sensitivity which complicates a preexisting palmoplantar pompholyx). Rare forms of noneczematous contact dermatitis are also pustular contact dermatitis and some nodular reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Vestita A, et al. Noneczematous contact dermatitis. ISRN Allergy. 2013;2013(361746):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonamonte D, Cavani A, Angelini G. Allergic contact dermatitis. In: Giannetti A, Del Forno C, editors. Textbook of dermatology and sexually transmitted diseases, vol. II. Padova: Piccin Nuova Libraria; 2013. p. 933.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr. Noneczematous contact dermatitis. In: Rietschel RL, Fowler Jr JF, editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goh CL. Non-eczematous occupational contact reactions. In: Kanerva L, Elshner P, Wahlberg JE, et al., editors. Handbook of occupational dermatology. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh CL. Non-eczematous contact reactions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosh PJ, et al., editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 413.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foti C. Dermatite allergica da contatto non eczematosa. In: Angelini G, Vena GA, editors, Dermatologia professionale e ambientale, vol 2. Brescia: ISED; 1999. p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holst R, Kirby J, Magnusson B. Sensitization to tropical woods giving erythema multiforme-like eruptions. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin P, Bergoend H, Piette F. Erythema multiforme-like eruption from Brazilian rosewood. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Contact Dermatitis, Barcelona; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher AA. Erythema multiforme-like eruptions due to exotic woods and ordinary plants: part 1. Cutis. 1986;37:101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher AA, Bikowski J Jr. Allergic contact dermatitis due to a wooden cross made of Dalbergia nigra. Contact Dermatitis. 1981;7:45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Irvine C, Reynolds A, Finlay AY. Erythema multiforme-like reaction to “rosewood”. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurz G, Rapaport MJ. External/internal allergy to plants (Artemisia). Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moschella SL. Erythema multiforme. Dermatology, vol 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mallory SB, Miller OF, Tyler WB. Toxicodendron radicans dermatitis with black lacquer deposit on the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6:363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz RS, Downham TF. Erythema multiforme associated with Rhus contact dermatitis. Cutis. 1981;27:85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Torinuki W. Generalized erythema multiforme-like eruption following allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1990;23:202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirby JD, Darley CR. Erythema multiforme associated with a contact dermatitis to terpenes. Contact Dermatitis. 1978;4:238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Raccagni AA, Bardazzi F, Baldari U, et al. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis due to capsicum. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mateo MPG, Velasco M, Miquel FJ, et al. Erythema multiforme-like eruption following allergic contact dermatitis from sesquiterpene lactones in herbal medicine. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hjorth N. Primula dermatitis. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1966;52:207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Virgili A, Corazza M. Unusual primin dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24:63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lengrand F, Tellart AS, Segard M, et al. Erythema multiforme-like eruption: an unusual presentation of primula contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gallo R, Sorbara S, Rongioletti F. Contact erythema multiforme from Primula obconica. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bonamonte D, Filotico R, Mastrandrea V, et al. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis from primin. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Badaoui A, Pequet C, Fargeas C, et al. Contact dermatitis caused by Geranium robertianum with erythema multiforme-like reaction. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Athanasiadis GI, Pfab F, Klein A, et al. Erythema multiforme due to contact with laurel oil. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Uzuncakmak TK, Karadag AS, Izol B, et al. Erythema multiforme-like allergic contact dermatitis associated with laurel oil: a rare presentation. Dermatol Online J. 2015;16:21.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huber J, deShazo R, Powell D, et al. Erythema multiforme-like allergic contact dermatitis to turmeric essential oil. Dermatitis. 2016;27:385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin N, Tang X, Zhou H, et al. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis caused by herbal medicine. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;80:189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Secondary polymorphic eruptions in allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatologica. 1981;163:63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Contact dermatitis from pyrrolnitrin. Contact Dermatitis. 1982;8:55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gottschalk HR, Stone OJ. Stevens Johnson syndrome from ophthalmic sulfonamide. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112:513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rubin Z. Ophthalmic sulfonamide induced Stevens Johnson syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Affee HS, Dressler DP. Topical application of mafenide acetate. Its association with erythema multiforme and cutaneous reactions. Arch Dermatol. 1969;100:277.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fisher AA. Erythema multiforme-like eruptions due to topical medications: part II. Cutis. 1986;37:158.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Degreef H, Bonamie A, van Derheyden D, et al. Mephenesin contact dermatitis with erythema multiforme features. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10:220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schulze-Dirks A, Frosch PJ. Contact allergy to mephenesin. Hautarzt. 1993;44:403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kerre S, Busschots A, Dooms-Goossens A. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis due to phenylbutazone. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Koch P, Bahmer FA. Erythema multiforme-like, urticarial papular and plaque eruptions from bufexamac: report of 4 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31:97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Walchner M, Rueff F, Przybilla B. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to mofebutazone underlying a severe drug reaction. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36:54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stingeni L, Caraffini S, Assalve D, et al. Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis from budesonide. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Valsecchi R, Reseghetti A, Leghissa P, et al. Erythema multiforme-like lesions from triamcinolone acetonide. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ross Smart DR, Powell DL. Erythema multiforme-like allergic contact reaction to topical triamcinolone. Dermatitis. 2014;25:89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Calnan CD. Nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1956;68:229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cook LJ. Associated nickel and cobalt contact dermatitis presenting as erythema multiforme. Contact Dermatitis. 1982;8:280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Friedman SJ, Perry HO. Erythema multiforme associated with contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fisher AA. Erythema multiforme-like eruptions due to topical miscellaneous compounds: part III. Cutis. 1986;37:262.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Powell EW. Skin reactions to 9-bromofluorene. Br J Dermatol. 1968;80:491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roed-Petersen J. Erythema multiforme as an expression of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Foti C, Soleo L, Romita P, et al. Occupational erythema multiforme-like contact reaction to iodoacetonitrile in a chemistry student. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;64:180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lamoureux A, Meharon M, Durand AL, et al. A first case of erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis caused by propolis. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bonamonte D, Angelini G. Dermatite da contatto purpurica. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol. 2001;55:53.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Batschvarov B, Minkov DM. Dermatitis and purpura from rubber in clothing. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1968;54:178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Calnan CD, Peachey RDC. Allergic contact purpura. Clinical Allergy. 1971;1:287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fisher AA. Allergic petechial and purpuric rubber dermatitis: the PPPP syndrome. Cutis. 1974;14:25.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fisher AA. Purpuric contact dermatitis. Cutis. 1984;33:346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Romaguera C, Grimalt F. PPPP syndrome. Contact Dermatitis. 1977;3:102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Vilaplana J. Eczematous and purpuric allergic contact dermatitis from boots. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;21:269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Carlsen L, Andersen KE, Egsgaard H. IPPD contact allergy from an orthopedic bandage. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17:119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Roed-Petersen J, Clemmensen OJ, Menné T, et al. Purpuric contact dermatitis from black rubber chemicals. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Osmundsen PE. Contact dermatitis due to an optical whitener in washing powders. Br J Dermatol. 1969;81:799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Osmunsden PE. Contact dermatitis from an optical whitener in washing powders. Cutis. 1972;10:59.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Piñol Aguadé J, Grimalt F, Romaguera C, et al. Dermatitis por blanqueadores opticos. Medicina Cutanea. 1971;5:249.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Van der Veen JP, Neering H, de Haan P, et al. Pigmented purpuric clothing dermatitis due to disperse blue 85. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Foti C, Elia G, Filotico R, et al. Purpuric clothing dermatitis due to paraphenylenediamine disperse yellow 27. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;39:273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Shmunes E. Purpuric allergic contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 1978;4:225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hellier FF. Dermatitis purpurica after contact with textiles. Hautarzt. 1960;11:173.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Lecha M. Occupational purpuric textile dermatitis from formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis. 1981;7:152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Faure M, Dambuyant C, Chabeau G, et al. Immune complex vasculitis and contact dermatitis to Frullania. Contact Dermatitis. 1981;7:320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ricks MR, Vogel PS, Elston DM, et al. Purpuric agave dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Petruzzellis V, Angelini G, Vena GA. La dermatite artefatta. Boll Dermatol Allergol Profes. 1988;3:23.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Cherpelis BS, Fenske NA. Purpuric irritant contact dermatitis induced by Agave americana. Cutis. 2000;66:287.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Genillier-Foin N, Avenel-Audran M. Purpuric contact dermatitis from Agave americana. Ann Dermatol Vénéreol. 2007;134:477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Barabash-Neila R, Zulueta-Dorado T, Conejo-Mir J. Agave americana causing irritant contact dermatitis with a purpuric component. Actas Dermosifil. 2011;102:74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Tello T, Chiu NT, North JP. Purpuric agave dermatitis. J Cutan Pathol. 2017;44:995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Grandolfo M, Foti C, Vena GA. Fitodermatite da contatto irritante con granturco. Boll Dermatol Allergol Profes. 1994;9:225.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Falk A, Fischer T, Hagberg M. Purpuric rash caused by dermal exposure to d-limonene. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;25:198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Angelini G, Vena GA. Airborne contact dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 1992;10:123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Angelini G, Vena GA. Dermatosi aerotrasmesse. In: Angelini G, Vena GA, editors. Dermatologia professionale e ambientale, vol I. Brescia: ISED;1997. p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Abel R. Washing machine and fiberglass. Arch Dermatol. 1966;93:78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bruynzeel DP, van den Hoogenband HM, Koedijk F. Purpuric vasculitis-like eruption in a patient sensitive to balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11:207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Eczémas de contact allergiques et réactions par voie générale à l’allergène. Méd Hyg. 1985;43:879.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Van Joost T, van Ulsen J, Vuzevski VD, et al. Purpuric contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Goh CL. Erythema multiforme-like and purpuric eruption due to contact allergy to proflavine. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17:53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Schmidt H, Larsen FS, Larsen PO, et al. Petechial reaction following patch testing with cobalt. Contact Dermatitis. 1980;6:91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Goh CL, Kwok SF, Rajan VS. Cross sensitivity in colour developers. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;10:280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Mandel EH. Lichen planus-like eruptions caused by a color-film developer. Arch Dermatol. 1960;81:516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Fry L. Skin disease from colour developers. Br J Dermatol. 1965;77:456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Roed-Petersen J, Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis and lichen planus from black-and-white photographic developing. Cutis. 1976;18:699.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Knudsen EA. Lichen planus-like eruption caused by color developer. Arch Dermatol. 1964;89:357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Sharma VK, Mandal SK, Sethuraman G, et al. Para-phenylenediamine-induced lichenoid eruptions. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lapière K, Matthieu L, Meuleman L, et al. Primula dermatitis mimicking lichen planus. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44:199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lombardi P, Campolmi P, Sertoli A. Lichenoid dermatitis caused by nickel salts? Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lichter M, Drury D, Remlinger K. Lichenoid dermatitis caused by epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Lembo G, Balato N, Patruno C. Lichenoid contact dermatitis due to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17:122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kawamura T, Fukuda S, Ohtake N, et al. Lichen planus-like contact dermatitis due to methacrylic acid esters. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Raymond J, Konya J, Bakis-Petsoglou S, et al. Lichenoid contact dermatitis secondary to methylisothiazolinone (MI). JAAD. 2016;2:380.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Guo S, Jiang JF, Tan C. induced by Semen Sinapis alba. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2018;28:350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Frykholm KO, Frithiof L, Fernström AI, et al. Allergy to copper derived from dental alloys as a possible cause of oral lesions of lichen planus. Acta Derm-Venereol. 1969;49:268.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ido T, Kumakiri M, Kiyohara T, et al. Oral lichen planus due to zinc in dental restorations. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47:51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Laine J, Kalimo K, Forssell H, et al. Resolution of oral lichenoid lesions after replacement of amalgam restorations in patients allergic to mercury compounds. Br J Dermat. 1992;126:10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Romita P, et al. Colors and contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2014;25:155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Valladares Narganes LM, Sanchez Sambucety P, Ruiz Gonzalez I, et al. Lymphomatoid dermatitis caused by contact with textile dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;68:54.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Orbaneya JG, Diez LI, Lozano JL, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis: a syndrome produced by epicutaneous hypersensitivity with clinical features and hystopathologic picture similar to that of mycosis fungoides. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Calzavara-Pinton P, Capezzera R, Zane C, et al. Lymphomatoid allergic contact dermatitis from para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47:173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Evans AV, Banerjee P, McFadden JP, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis to para-tertyl-butyl phenol resin. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Ayala F, Balato N, Nappa P, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;17:311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Shelley WB, Epstein E. Contact-sensitivity to gold as a chronic papular eruption. Arch Dermatol. 1963;87:388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Schena D, Rosina S, Chieregato C, et al. Lymphomatoid-like contact dermatitis from cobalt naphthenate. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Fisher AA. Chronic allergic contact dermatitis simulating mycosis fungoides. Boll Dermatol Allergol Profes. 1987;2:13.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Wall LM. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis due to ethylenediamine dihydrochloride. Contact Dermatitis. 1982;8:51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Knackstedt TJ, Zug KA. T cell lymphomatoid contact dermatitis: a challenging case and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;72:65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Uzunçakmak TK, Akdeniz N, Özkanlı Ş, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis associated with textile dye at an unusual location. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6:S24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Van Steenkiste E, Goossens A, Meert H, et al. Airborne-induced lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;72:237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Schoendorff-Ortega C, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by limonene hydroperoxides confirmed by an exposure provocation test with the involved personal hygiene products. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78:230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Fernández-Canga P, Sambucety P, Narganes LM, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis induced by acrylates mimicking lymphomatoid papulosis. Dermatitis. 2018;29:167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Narganes LM, Sambucety PS, Gonzalez IR, et al. Lymphomatoid dermatitis caused by contact with textile dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Smets K, Busschots A, Hauben E, et al. B-cell lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28:91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Mendese G, Beckford A, Demierre MF, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis to baby wipes. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Danese P, Bertazzoni MG. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis due to nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Houck HE, Wirth FA, Kauffman CL. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by nickel. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 1977;8:175.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Fleming C, Burden D, Fallowfield M, et al. Lymphomatoid contact reaction to gold earrings. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;37:298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Marlière V, Beylot-Barry M, Doutre MS, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis caused by isopropyl-diphenylenediamine: two cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102:152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Conde-Taboada A, Rosón E, Fernández-Redondo V, et al. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis induced by gold earrings. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Ezzedine K, Rafii N, Heenen M. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis to an exotic wood: a very harmful toilet seat. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57:128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Alvarez-Garrido H, Sanz-Muñoz C, Martínez-García G, et al. Lymphomatoid photocontact dermatitis to benzydamine hydrochloride. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62:117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Whittemore AS, Holly EA, Lee IM, et al. Mycosis fungoides in relation to environmental exposures and immune response: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Osmundsen PE. Pigmented contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1970;83:296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Ancona Alayon A, Escobar Marques R, Gonzalez Mendoza A, et al. Occupational pigmented contact dermatitis from naphthol AS. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Fujimoto K, Hashimoto S, Kozuka T, et al. Occupational pigmented contact dermatitis from azo-dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12:15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Kozuka T, Tashiro M, Sano S. Brilliant lake red R as a cause of pigmented contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Fountain RB. Occupational melanoderma. Br J Dermatol. 1967;79:59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Hamada T, Horiguchi S. Chronic melanodermatitis due to the rubber peephole of a ship radarscope. Contact Dermatitis. 1978;4:245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Bonamonte A, Angelini G. Disordini pigmentari da contatto. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol. 2001;55:1.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Woo YR, Kim JS, Lim JH, et al. Acquired diffuse slate-grey facial dyspigmentation due to henna: an unrecognized cause of pigment contact dermatitis in Korean patients. Eur J Dermatol. 2018;28:644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Zaaroura H, Bergman R, Nevet MJ. Pigmented facial contact dermatitis to benzyl salicylate: a comparative histopathological and immunohistochemical study of the involved skin and the positive patch test site. Am J Dermatopathol. 2019;41:443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Sharma VK, Bhatia R, Yadav CP. Clinical profile and allergens in pigmented cosmetic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics in India. Dermatitis. 2018;29:264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Wattanakrai L, Miyamoto L, Taylor JS. Occupational pigmentary disorders. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, et al., editors. Handbook of occupational dermatology. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 280.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  139. Bonamonte D, Vestita M, Romita P, et al. Chemical leukoderma. Dermatitis. 2016;27:90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Verma A, Tancharoen C, Tam MM, et al. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrances. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Burkhart CG. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis: a distinct clinical and pathological entity. Cutis. 1981;27:630.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Lazarov A, Ingber A. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis to isoconazole nitrate. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;8:229.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Sánchez-Motilla JM, Pont V, Nagore E, et al. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis from minoxidil. Contact Dermatitis. 1998;38:283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Rodríguez-Martín M, Sáez-Rodríguez M, Carnerero-Rodríguez A, et al. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis from topical minoxidil 5%. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:701.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. El Anzi O, Hassam B. Pustular dermatosis of the scalp due to topical minoxidil 5%. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30:83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Schoel VJ, Frosch BJ. Allergisches kontaktekzem durch gummiin-haltsstoffe unter dem Bild einer Pustulosis palmaris. Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1990;38:178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Barrazza V, Ollivaud L. Merbromin-induced pustular contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Conde Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Romero LV, et al. Subcorneal pustular eruption and erythema from occupational exposure to trichloroethylene. Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Hotta E, Tamagawa-Mineoka R, Masuda K, et al. Pustular allergic contact dermatitis caused by Disperse yellow 3 in a dark blue dress. Allergol Int. 2017;66:629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Lisi P, Stingeni L, Cristaudo A, et al. Clinical and epidemiological feature of textile contact dermatitis. An Italian multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70:344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Roujeau JC1, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:1333.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Fernando SL. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53:87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Broesby-Olsen S, Clemmensen O, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis from a topical corticosteroid mimicking acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85:444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Tohgi N, Eto H, Maejima H, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis induced by topical hydrocortisone butyrate propionate mimicking acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Córdoba S, García-Donoso C, Villanueva CA, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from methylchloroisothiazolinone with acute exanthematous pustulosis-like histopathologic changes. Dermatitis. 2011;22:60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. González-Cantero Á, Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-like contact dermatitis from topical therapy in a polysensitized patient. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80:329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Hjorth N. Diagnostic patch testing. In: Marzulli F, Maibach HI, editors. Dermatoxicology and pharmacology. New York: Wiley;1977. P. 344.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Fisher AA, Chargrin L, Fleischmayer R, et al. Pustular patch test reactions, with particular reference to those produced by ammonium fluoride. Arch Dermatol. 1959;80:742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI. Sterile cutaneous pustules: a manifestation of primary irritancy? Identification of contact pustulogens. J Invest Dermatol. 1981;76:381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Uehara M, Takahashi C, Ofuji S. Pustular patch test reactions in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:1154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Angelini G, Grandolfo M. Test diagnostici. In: Angelini G, Vena GA, editors. Dermatologia allergologica e professionale, vol. 2. Brescia: ISED;1997. p. 572.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Bonamonte D, Foti C, Carpentieri A, et al. Dermatite allergica da contatto in età pediatrica. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol. 2010;64:1.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Meneghini Cl, Angelini G. Le dermatiti da contatto. Lombardo Ed. Roma; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Contact and microbial allergy in pompholyx. Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5:46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Vena GA, Mazzoccoli S, Angelini G. Studio epidemiologico, clinico ed eziopatogenetico della disidrosi. Boll Dermatol Allergol Profes. 1992;7:259.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Reichenberger M. Die Dyshidrosis als Schrittmacher für berufliche Dermatosen. Derm Beruf Unwelt. 1975;29:127.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Menné T, Hjorth N. Pompholyx—dyshidrotic eczema. Sem Dermatol. 1983;2:75.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Christensen OB, Möller H. Nickel allergy and hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Christensen OB, Möller H. External and internal exposure to the antigen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Cronin E, Di Michiel AD, Brows SS. Oral challenge in nickel sensitive women with hand eczema. In: Brown SS, Sunderman FW Jr, editors. Nickel toxicology. New York: Academic Press; 1980. p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Kaaber K, Veien NK, Tjell JC. Low nickel diet in the treatment of patients with chronic nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1978;98:197.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Burrows D, Creswell S, Merrett JD. Nickel, hands and hip prostheses. Br J Dermatol. 1981;105:437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Jordan WP Jr, King SE. Nickel feeding in nickel-sensitive patients with hand eczema. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1979;1:506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Zelickson BD, McEvoy MT, Fransway AF. Patch testing in prurigo nodularis. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;20:32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Petras H, Mc Millan AL. Allergic contact sensitivity to gold with unusual features. Br J Dermatol. 1973;88:505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Younge E. Contact hypersensitivity to metallic gold. Dermatologica. 1974;149:294.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Fisher AA. Metallic gold: the cause of persistent allergic “dermal” contact dermatitis. Cutis. 1974;14:177.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Iwatsuki K, Tagami H, Moriguchi T, et al. Lymphadenoid structure induced by gold hypersensitivity. Arch Dermatol. 1982;118:608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Monti M, Berti E, Cavicchini S, et al. Unusual cutaneous reaction after a gold chloride patch test. Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Iwatsuki K, yamada M, Takigawa M, et al. Benign lymphoplasia of the earlobes induced by gold earrings: immunohistologic study on the cellular infiltrate. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16:83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Bonamonte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonamonte, D., Foti, C., Bosco, A., Angelini, G. (2021). Noneczematous Contact Dermatitis. In: Angelini, G., Bonamonte, D., Foti, C. (eds) Clinical Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49332-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49331-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49332-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics