Skip to main content

User Interfaces in Dark Mode During Daytime – Improved Productivity or Just Cool-Looking?

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 12188)

Abstract

Applications are increasingly coming equipped with a so-called dark mode. Our observation is that many computer enthusiasts are under the impression that dark mode in a way is better than the traditional light mode. This study sets out to explore this belief by observing if dark mode indeed poses any improvements in terms of productivity and quantity of errors over light mode. A controlled experiment was designed involving a visually intensive text entry task using a virtual keyboard with an unfamiliar layout. The results indicate that there were no differences between dark mode and light mode in terms of productivity and quantity of errors.

Keywords

  • Dark mode
  • Dark UI
  • Dark theme
  • Productivity
  • Error rate
  • Text entry
  • Preference
  • Personalization
  • Color theme
  • High contrast mode

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_13
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-49282-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

References

  1. Mantiuk, R., Rempel, A. G., Heidrich, W.: Display considerations for night and low-illumination viewing. In: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization, pp. 53–58. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1620993.1621005

  2. Rempel, A.G., Mantiuk, R., Heidrich, W.: Display considerations for improved night vision performance. In: Color and Imaging Conference, vol. 2011, no. 1, pp. 191–194. Society for Imaging Science and Technology (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, J., Billah, S.M., Shilkrot, R., Balasubramanian, A.: DarkReader: bridging the gap between perception and reality of power consumption in smartphones for blind users. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 96–104. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353806

  4. Dong, M., Choi, Y.S.K., Zhong, L.: Power-saving color transformation of mobile graphical user interfaces on OLED-based displays. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, pp. 339–342. ACM (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1594233.1594317

  5. Philips, M.: Dark UIs. The Good and the Bad. Dos and Don’ts. Downloaded, 7 January 2020. https://www.toptal.com/designers/ui/dark-ui

  6. Riegler, A., Riener, A., Holzmann, C.: Adaptive dark mode: investigating text and transparency of windshield display content for automated driving. In: Mensch und Computer 2019-Workshopband (2019). https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-612

  7. Kim, K., Erickson, A., Lambert, A., Bruder, G., Welch, G.: Effects of dark mode on visual fatigue and acuity in optical see-through head-mounted displays. In: Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, pp. 1–9. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3357251.3357584

  8. Sandnes, F.E., Eika, E.: Head-mounted augmented reality displays on the cheap: a DIY approach to sketching and prototyping low-vision assistive technologies. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2017, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10278, pp. 167–186. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58703-5_13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchner, A., Mayr, S., Brandt, M.: The advantage of positive text-background polarity is due to high display luminance. Ergonomics 52(7), 882–886 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802641635

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Piepenbrock, C., Mayr, S., Mund, I., Buchner, A.: Positive display polarity is advantageous for both younger and older adults. Ergonomics 56(7), 1116–1124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.790485

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsang, S.N., Chan, A.H., Yu, R.F.: Effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe shape characteristics. Ergonomics 55(9), 1028–1042 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.688876

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Bangor, A.: Electronic text readability issues for the visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 1372–1375. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129904302323

  13. Sandnes, F.E.: Universell utforming av IKT-systemer, 2nd edn. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brathovde, K., Farner, M.B., Brun, F.K., Sandnes, F.E.: Effectiveness of color-picking interfaces among non-designers. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2019. LNCS, vol. 11792, pp. 181–189. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30949-7_21

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandnes, F.E.: On-screen colour contrast for visually impaired readers: selecting and exploring the limits of WCAG2. 0 colours. In: Black, A., Lund, O., Walker, S. (eds.) Information Design: Research and Practice, pp. 405–416 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sandnes, F.E.: Understanding WCAG2. 0 color contrast requirements through 3D color space visualization. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 229, 366–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-684-2-366

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Sandnes, F.E., Zhao, A.: An interactive color picker that ensures WCAG2. 0 compliant color contrast levels. Procedia Comput. Sci. 67, 87–94 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.252

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Sandnes, F.E., Zhao, A.: A contrast colour selection scheme for WCAG2. 0-compliant web designs based on HSV-half-planes. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1233–1237. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/smc.2015.220

  19. Sandnes, F.E.: An image-based visual strategy for working with color contrasts during design. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds.) ICCHP 2018, Part I. LNCS, vol. 10896, pp. 35–42. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94277-3_7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen, F., Krivan, J.J., Sandnes, F.E.: Still not readable? An interactive tool for recommending color pairs with sufficient contrast based on existing visual designs. In: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 636–638. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354585

  21. Bradley, K., Rafter, R., Smyth, B.: Case-based user profiling for content personalisation. In: Brusilovsky, P., Stock, O., Strapparava, C. (eds.) AH 2000. LNCS, vol. 1892, pp. 62–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44595-1_7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Sunar, A.S., Abdullah, N.A., White, S., Davis, H.: Personalisation in MOOCs: a critical literature review. In: Zvacek, S., Restivo, M.T., Uhomoibhi, J., Helfert, M. (eds.) CSEDU 2015. CCIS, vol. 583, pp. 152–168. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29585-5_9

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoh, S., Gillies, S., Gardner, M.R.: Device personalisation—where content meets device. BT Technol. J. 21(1), 67–74 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022456327773

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Cremers, A.H.M., Neerincx, M.A.: Personalisation meets accessibility: towards the design of individual user interfaces for all. In: Stary, C., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UI4ALL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3196, pp. 119–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30111-0_9

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Tossell, C.C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Rahmati, A., Zhong, L.: An empirical analysis of smartphone personalisation: measurement and user variability. Behav. Inf. Technol. 31(10), 995–1010 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.687773

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. García-Barrios, V.M., Mödritscher, F., Gütl, C.: Personalisation versus adaptation? A user-centred model approach and its application. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW), pp. 120–127 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Aschim, T.B., Gjerstad, J.L., Lien, L.V., Tahsin, R., Sandnes, F.E.: Are split tablet keyboards better? A study of soft keyboard layout and hand posture. In: Lamas, D., Loizides, F., Nacke, L., Petrie, H., Winckler, M., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) INTERACT 2019, Part III. LNCS, vol. 11748, pp. 647–655. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29387-1_37

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Sandnes, F.E.: Evaluating mobile text entry strategies with finite state automata. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human computer interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, pp. 115–121. ACM (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1085777.1085797

  29. Sandnes, F.E., Aubert, A.: Bimanual text entry using game controllers: relying on users’ spatial familiarity with QWERTY. Interact. Comput. 19(2), 140–150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.08.003

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye, L., Sandnes, F.E, MacKenzie, I.S.: QB-Gest: qwerty bimanual gestural input for eyes-free smartphone text input, In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12188, pp. 223–242. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_16

  31. Norman, D.A., Fisher, D.: Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: keyboard layout doesn’t much matter. Hum. Factors 24(5), 509–519 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088202400502

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Sandnes, F.E.: Effects of common keyboard layouts on physical effort: implications for kiosks and Internet banking. In: The Proceedings of Unitech2010: International Conference on Universal Technologies, pp. 91–100 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 754–755. ACM (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.765971

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frode Eika Sandnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pedersen, L.A., Einarsson, S.S., Rikheim, F.A., Sandnes, F.E. (2020). User Interfaces in Dark Mode During Daytime – Improved Productivity or Just Cool-Looking?. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Approaches and Supporting Technologies. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12188. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49281-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49282-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)