Abstract
The increased attention to diversity and inclusion within Canadian defence, particularly in light of the 2017 Defence Policy Strong, Secure, Engaged, may appear like a recent development. However, this chapter argues that critical junctures and social movements since the 1960s have resulted in greater diversity and inclusivity in the Canadian defence realm. In doing so, we identify limitations to the current policy framework, and argue that “seminal” works on defence policy in Canada—although foundational to our understanding—must engage with critical and feminist perspectives, and their histories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For the purposes of this chapter, we use LGBTQ2S as per the Government of Canada. LGBT is used in reference to the LGBT Purge, in which LGBT was the agreed upon acronym for the class action lawsuit. Further variations are based on honouring the original acronym/focus used in academic articles that are cited.
- 2.
DND has recognised the need for a department-wide initiative in response to the historical exclusion of LGBTQ2S employees and personnel.
- 3.
As will be discussed below, initiatives such as Positive Space seek to increase competencies and allyship across DND for the LGBTQ2S community.
- 4.
Which refers to “gender blindness” or ignoring the implications of gender in the Canadian Armed Forces under the purview that “a soldier is a soldier.”
- 5.
The inclusion of a gendered lens into policymaking, operational planning, and missions.
- 6.
For example, in Afghanistan, where Canada’s intervention was defended in part by the rationale of protecting women’s rights.
- 7.
Likely longer.
- 8.
The thirty-five-women quota was the minimum number of women required to build lavatory facilities, drawing parallels to the “cost effectiveness” argument.
- 9.
Relevant to this discussion are Sections 7-11, which highlight the limiting of employment opportunities (CHRA 1985).
- 10.
See CF Mil Pers Instr 01/11, Management of Transsexuals, issued 2011/02/08. Accessed through https://www.scribd.com/document/354809378/Canadian-Forces-policy-on-transgender-service-members
- 11.
Named after Elizabeth “Elsie” Muriel Gregory MacGill, commissioner of the Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada, who was awarded the Order of Canada in 1971. See Canada 2018b.
References
Agathangelou, Anna M., and L.H.M. Ling. 2004. The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism. International Studies Review 6 (4): 21–49.
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. A Common Language of Gender? Politics and Gender 1 (1): 128–137.
Bird, Florence, Jacques Henripin, John P. Humphrey, Lola M. Lange, Jeanne Lapointe, Elsie Gregory MacGill, and Doris Ogilvie. 1970. The Report of the Royal Commission on the Status of Women. Ottawa: The Commission.
Boucher, Lisa. 2017. Funding for Women’s Organizations. Policy 4 Women: Public Space, Public Engagement. http://www.criaw-icref.ca/images/userfiles/files/Funding4WomensOrgs_Accessible.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2018.
Canada. 2015. Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+). Ottawa: Status of Women Canada. https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2018.
———. 2016. Defence Policy Review. Gender Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) Roundtable Discussion Report.http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/defence-policy-review/gender-based-analysis-roundtable-report.asp. Accessed 2 May 2019.
———. 2017a. Canada’s Feminist Foreign Assistance Policy. Ottawa. Global Affairs Canada. https://international.gc.ca/world-monde/assets/pdfs/iap2-eng.pdf
———. 2017b. Canada’s Defence Policy: Strong, Secure, Engaged. Ottawa: Department of National Defence.
———. 2018a. Progress Report for Canada’s National Action Plan 2017–2022 for the Implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions on Women, Peace and Security Fiscal Year 2017–2018. Ottawa: Global Affairs Canada. https://www.international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/gender_equality-egalite_des_genres/wps-fps-2017-2022.aspx?lang=eng. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
———. 2018b. Elsie Initiative for Women in Peace Operations. https://international.gc.ca/world-monde/issues_development-enjeux_developpement/gender_equality-egalite_des_genres/elsie_initiative-initiative_elsie.aspx?lang=eng. Accessed 2 May 2019.
———. 2018c.The Elsie Initiative on Women in Peace Operations. https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2018/03/the-elsie-initiative-on-women-in-peace-operations.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2018.
———. 2018d. Departmental Plan 2018–2019. Ottawa: Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. http://www.forces.gc.ca/assets/FORCES_Internet/docs/en/about-reports-pubs/dnd_2018-19_departmental-plan.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.
Canadian Human Rights Act, Statutes of Canada. 1985. c. H-6.
Canadian Press. 2006. Tories to Cut Off Funding for Women’s Lobby Groups. CBC, October 4: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tories-to-cut-off-funding-for-women-s-lobby-groups-1.594392. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.
Carpenter, R.Charli. 2006. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue 37 (1): 83–103.
Charbonneau, Bruno, and Wayne S. Cox. 2008. Global Order, US Hegemony and Military Integration: The Canadian-American Defense Relationship. International Political Sociology 2 (4): 305–321.
Chief of the Defence Staff [CDS]. 2017. CDS Directive for Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Related Resolutions into CAF Planning and Operations. Ottawa: Department of National Defence. http://www.forces.gc.ca/assets/FORCES_Internet/docs/en/about-reports-pubs-cds/cds-directive-unscr-1325-directive-cemd-rcsnu-1325.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2018.
Cleary, Laura. 2011. Triggering Critical Mass. Defence Studies 11 (1): 43–65.
Cohn, Carol, and Cynthia Enloe. 2003. A Conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists Look at Masculinity and the Men Who Wage War. Signs 28 (4): 1187–1207.
Coon, Devin, Paula M. Neira, and Brandyn D. Lau. 2018. Threats to United States Fully Reviewed and Strategic Plan for Integration of Transgender Military Members Into the Armed Forces. American Journal of Public Health. 108 (7): 892–894.
Crosbie, Thomas, and Marek Posard. 2016. Barriers to Serve: Social Policy and the Transgendered Military. Journal of Sociology 52(3): 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316655632. Accessed 2 May 2019.
Davis, Karen. 1997. Understanding Women’s Exit from the Canadian Forces: Implications or Integration? In Wives and Warriors: Women and the Military in the United States and Canada, ed. Laurie Lee Weinstein and Christie C. White, 199–235. Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Dewitt, David, and Jeffrey Plante. 2004. National Defence vs. Foreign Affairs: Culture Clash in Canada’s International Security Policy? International Journal 59 (3): 579–595.
Edward Ross, Todd, Martine Roy, and Alida Satalic (Plaintiffs) and Her Majesty the Queen (Defendant). 2017. Statement of Claim. Court File No.: T-370-17. Supreme Court of Canada.
Eichler, Maya. 2013. Women and Combat in Canada: Continuing Tensions Between “Difference” and “Equality”. Critical Studies on Security 1(2): 257–259….
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
George W. Bush Institute. 2013. Radio Address by Mrs. Laura W. Bush, Crawford, November 17. https://www.bushcenter.org/publications/articles/2013/02/radio-address-by-mrs-laura-w-bush-crawford-tx-november-17-2001.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.
Gettleman, Jeffrey. 2010. Africa’s Forever Wars. Foreign Policy 178: 73–75.
Hartfiel, Robert Michael. 2010. Planning Without Guidance: Canadian Defence Policy and Planning, 1993–2004. Canadian Public Administration 53 (3): 323–349.
Hayes, Molly, and Laura Stone. 2018. Ford Government Disbands Liberals’ Expert Panel to End Violence Against Women. The Globe and Mail, October 17. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ford-government-disbands-liberals-expert-panel-to-end-violence/. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.
Howell, Alison. 2011. Peaceful, Tolerant, and Orderly? A Feminist Analysis of Discourses of “Canadian Values” in Canadian Foreign Policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 12 (1): 49–69.
Jones, Peter, and Philippe Lagassé. 2012. Rhetoric Versus Reality: Canadian Defence Planning in a Time of Austerity. Defense & Security Analysis 28 (2): 140–151.
Kaplan, Danny. 2003. Brothers and Others In Arms: The Making of Love and War in Israeli Combat Units. New York: The Hawthorne Press.
Kier, Elizabeth. 1998. Homosexuals in the US Military: Open Integration and Combat Effectiveness. International Security 23 (2): 5–39.
King, Anthony. 2015. Frontline: Combat and Cohesion in Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kinsman, Gary, and Patrizia Gentile. 2010. The Canadian War on Queers: National Security as Sexual Regulation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Lane, Andrea. 2017. Special Men: The Gendered Militarization of the Canadian Armed Forces. International Journal 72 (4): 463–483.
Massie, Justin. 2009. Making Sense of Canada’s “Irrational” International Security Policy: A tale of Three Strategic Cultures. International Journal 64 (3): 625–645.
Middlemiss, Danford William, and Joel Sokolsky. 1989. Canadian Defence: Decisions and Determinants. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishing.
Morton, Desmond. 2003. Understanding Canadian Defence. Toronto: Penguin Publishing.
Off, Carol. 2000. The Lion, the Fox and the Eagle: A Story of Generals and Justice in Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Toronto: Random House Canada.
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 2009. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Understanding Human Dynamics. Washington, DC. 20301-3140.
Okros, Alan, and Denise Scott. 2014. Gender Identity in the Canadian Forces: A Review of Possible Impacts on Operational Effectiveness. Armed Forces and Society 41 (2): 243–256.
Olsson, Louise, and Theodora-Ismene Gizelis. 2013. An Introduction to UNSCR 1325. International Interactions 39 (4): 425–434.
Ørvik, Nils. 1983. Canadian Security and Defence Against Help. Global Politics and Strategy: International Perspectives 26 (1): 26–31.
Paris, Roland. 2015. Canada’s Military Spending Is Now Less than Half of NATO’s Target. CIPS Blog, September 24. https://www.cips-cepi.ca/2015/09/24/canadian-defence-spending-is-less-than-half-of-nato-target/. Accessed 3 Dec 2018.
Poulin, Carmen, Lynne Gouliquer, and Jennifer Moore. 2009. Discharged for Homosexuality from the Canadian Military: Health Implications for Lesbians. Feminism & Psychology 19 (4): 496–516.
Richard Nossal, Kim. 2017. Charlie Foxtrot: Fixing Defence Procurement in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
Shadwick, Martin. 2011. Reviewing Defence Policy. National Defence and the Canadian Forces 12 (4): 79.
Shoemaker, Meaghan. 2017. Five Eyes Plus Gender Conference 2017 Proceedings Report. Canadian Defence Academy. http://cdainstitute.ca/canadian-defence-academy-releases-five-eyes-plus-gender-conference-2017-record-of-proceedings/. Accessed 2 Dec 2018.
Shoemaker, Meaghan, and Stéfanie von Hlatky. 2017. What’s NATO Got to Do with It? Women in the Canadian Armed Forces. In Canadian Defence at 150 and Beyond, James Pobrosa and Fadi Dawood, eds., 44–50. Toronto: NATO Association of Canada.
Simpson, Erika. 1998. Canada’s Defence Costs Will Jump with NATO Expansion. Peace Research 30 (1): 1–10.
Smith, Rupert (General). 2009. The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. London: Penguin Publishing.
Stachowitsch, Saskia. 2012. Military Gender Integration and Foreign Policy in the United States: A Feminist International Relations Perspective. Security Dialogue 43 (4): 305–321.
The Maple Leaf. 2018. Positive Space Training: Fostering an Inclusive Work Environment. https://ml-fd.caf-fac.ca/en/2018/06/15212. Accessed 2 May 2019.
Thompson, Wayne. 1988. Canada’s Defence Policy: Its Formulation and Domestic Context. American Review of Canadian Studies 18 (2): 161–179.
Tickner, J.Ann. 1988. Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation. Millennium 17 (3): 429–440.
Tiessen, Rebecca. 2015. Gender Essentialism in Canadian Foreign Aid Commitments to Women, Peace, and Security. International Journal 70 (1): 84–100.
Trudeau, Justin. 2017. Remarks by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to Apologize to LGBTQ2 Canadians. https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2017/11/28/remarks-prime-minister-justin-trudeau-apologize-lgbtq2-canadians. Accessed 1 Jan 2019.
UN Women. 2018. Infographic: Women’s Meaningful Participation Builds Peace. http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/multimedia/2018/10/infographic-womens-meaningful-participation-builds-peace. Accessed 18 Dec 2018.
United Nations. 2000. Resolution 1325: Adopted by the Security Council at Its 4213th Meeting, on 31 October 2000. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/720/18/PDF/N0072018.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 2 May 2019.
von Hlatky, Stéfanie. 2013. American Allies in Times of War: The Great Asymmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014. The Canadian Forces Can’t Be Gender Blind. The Ottawa Citizen, July 18. https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/the-canadian-forces-cant-be-gender-blind. Accessed 2 Dec 2018.
———. 2016. Trudeau’s Promises, from Coalition Operations to Peacekeeping and Beyond. CDA Institute Analysis. Ottawa: Conference of Defence Associations Institute. https://cdainstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/Analysis/images_Analysis_Hlatky_Analysis_June_2016.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.
von Hlatky, Stéfanie, and Hans Christian Breede. 2016. The Cultural Variable in Foreign and Defence Policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 22 (2): 103–107.
von Hlatky, Stéfanie, and Justin Massie. 2019. Ideology, Ballots, and Alliances: Canadian Participation in Multinational Military Operations. Contemporary Security Policy 40 (1): 101–115.
Whitworth, Sandra. 2005. Militarized Masculinities and the Politics of Peacekeeping: The Canadian Case. In Critical Security Studies in World Politics, ed. Ken Booth, 89–106. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Accessed at http://www.yorku.ca/sandraw/Whitworth%20in%20Booth%202005.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2020.
Wilson, Woodrow. 1918. Address to the Senate on the Nineteenth Amendment Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/329326. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
Women, Peace, and Security. 2015. NATO, UNSCR 1325 and Related Resolutions. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_91091.htm. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs 29 (1): 1–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shoemaker, M., von Hlatky, S. (2020). A Feminist Account of Canadian Defence Policy. In: Tremblay, M., Everitt, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender, Sexuality, and Canadian Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49240-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49240-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49239-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49240-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)