Skip to main content

Contrasting Protest Dynamics in Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand (1985–2005)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contention and Regime Change in Asia

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

Chapters 3, 4, and 5 are dedicated to the study of general dynamics of contention in democratizing Korea, Thailand, and Indonesia. To assess the pressure, protesters are able to mount against their authoritarian rulers, and several factors have been taken into account. Chapter 3 analyzes the general level of protest intensity in the countries during regime change. This analysis establishes a key difference between the countries that we explain in the remainder of the book: while the level of total protest in the three democratizing countries is everywhere high, protest in democratizing Korea and Indonesia undergoes a highly dynamic development as compared to Thailand, where protest is much more equally distributed over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On suicide protests in Korea, see, e.g., Biggs (2005).

  2. 2.

    For the definition of countries’ critical episode, see Chapter 2.

References

  • Beissinger, Mark R., and Gwendolyn Sasse. “An End to ‘Patience’? The Great Recession and Economic Protest in Eastern Europe.” In Mass Politics in Tough Times, edited by Larry M. Bartels and Nancy Bermeo, 334–70. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, Michael. “Dying Without Killing: Self-Immolations, 1963–2002.” In Making Sense of Suicide Missions, edited by Diego Gambetta, 173–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bunbongkan, Suchit. “Thailand’s Successful Reforms.” Journal of Democracy 10, no. 4 (1999): 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Christian, Sarah A. Soule, and David A. Armstrong. “Protesting While Black? The Differential Policing of American Activism, 1960 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 76, no. 1 (February 1, 2011): 152–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410395370.

  • Karstedt-Henke, Sabine. “Theorien Zur Erklärung Terroristischer Bewegungen [Theories for the Explanation of Terrorist Movements].” In Politik Der Inneren Sicherheit [The Politics of Internal Security], edited by Erhard Blankenburg, 198–234. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud. “The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989.” American Sociological Review 58, no. 5 (October 1, 1993): 637–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096279.

  • ———. “Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 19–46. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch2.

  • McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. Dynamics of Contention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCargo, Duncan. “Alternative Meanings of Political Reform in Contemporary Thailand.” The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13, no. 1 (1998): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, David G., Daniel J. Myers, N. Eugene Walls, and Maria-Elena D. Diaz. “Where Do We Stand with Newspaper Data?” Mobilization 10, no. 3 (2005): 397–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles, and Sidney Tarrow. Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Edward T., Andrew W. Martin, and John D. McCarthy. “Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires.” American Journal of Sociology 114, no. 1 (July 1, 2008): 35–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/588737.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Maduz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maduz, L. (2020). Contrasting Protest Dynamics in Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand (1985–2005). In: Contention and Regime Change in Asia. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49220-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics