Skip to main content

Introduction: Human Rights Journalism and its Nexus to Responsibility to Protect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights Journalism and its Nexus to Responsibility to Protect
  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

This short introductory chapter provides a general overview of the rationale and significance of the theory, practice and research of Human Rights Journalism (HRJ), and its nexus to Responsibility to Protect (R2P). This chapter addresses a key question that sets the theme of this book: Why is HRJ important for R2P? After briefly explaining the reasons and circumstances giving rise to the emergence of HRJ, this chapter identifies a number of deficits within the existing state of knowledge for the theory and practice of HRJ, addressed in this book: (1) The epistemological vacuum of HRJ. (2) Lack of understanding of the nexus between HRJ and R2P. (3) Lack of understanding of human rights-focused agenda setting. (4) Absence of an analytical method for assessing the practice of HRJ. (5) Lack of understanding regarding why the international media failed to make an impact on the humanitarian crisis in Sri Lanka in 2009.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • American Press Institute. (n.d.). The Lost Meaning of ‘Objectivity’ [Online]. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/journalism-essentials/bias-objectivity/lost-meaning-objectivity/. Accessed 13 Apr 2020.

  • Bell, M. (1998). The Journalism of Attachment. In M. Kiernan (Ed.), Media Ethics (pp. 16–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, S. L. (2000). The Media at War: Communication and Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L. (2006). The Spectatorship of Suffering. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, L. (2008). The Mediation of Suffering and the Vision of a Cosmopolitan Public. Television and New Media, 9(5), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, S. (2019). Humanitarianism, human insecurity, and communications: What’s changing in a globalised world? In S. Cottle & G. Cooper (Eds.), Humanitarianism, communications and change. Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F. M. (2009a). The Evolution of the Idea of “Sovereignty as Responsibility. In A. Adebajo. (ed.), From Global Apartheid to Global Village: Africa and the United Nations (pp. 191–213). Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F. M. (2009b). Frontiers of Sovereignty a Framework of Protection, Assistance, and Development for the Internally Displaced. Leiden Journal of International Law, 8(2), 249–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downman, S., & Ubayasiri, K. (2017). Journalism for Social Change in Asia: Reporting Human Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (2002). Peace Journalism: A Challenge. In W. Kempf and H. Luostarinen (Eds.), Journalism and the New World Order, Studying War and the Media (pp. 269–272). Nordicom: Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICISS (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty). (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: The International Development Research Centre. Available at: http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.

  • Kempf, W. (2002). Conflict Coverage and Conflict Escalation. In W. Kempf & H. Luostarinen (Eds.), Journalism and New World Order: Volume II. Studying War and Media. Gothenburg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempf, W. (2003). Constructive Conflict Coverage: A Social Psychological Approach. Konstaner Online-Publikations-System (KOPS). Available at: https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/10220/2003_Constructive_Conflict_Coverage.pdf;sequence=1. Accessed on 06 Oct 2020.

  • Loyn, D. (2007). Good Journalism or Peace Journalism. Conflict & Communication Online, 6(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2008). Debates in Peace Journalism. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., & McGoldrick, A. (2007). Peace Journalism. In C. Webel & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook of peace and studies conflict (pp. 248–264). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, G. (2002). The War Correspondent. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, I. S. (2012). Human Rights Journalism: Advances in Reporting Distant Humanitarian Interventions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, I., Lynch, J., & Hackett, R. (2011). Expanding Peace Journalism: Comparative and Critical Approaches. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. (Ed.). (2007). The Media and the Rwanda Genocide. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. J. A. (2008). Truth and Objectivity. In L. Wilkins & C. G. Christians (Eds.), The Handbook of Mass Media Ethics (pp. 71–83). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webel, C., & Galtung, J. (2007). Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. M., & Banda, M. (2010). International Law and the Responsibility to Protect: Clarifying or Expanding States’ Responsibilities? Global Responsibility to Protect, 2(2), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, N. J., & Egerton, F. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: “Precious Commitment” or a Promise Unfulfilled? Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1), 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Selvarajah, S. (2020). Introduction: Human Rights Journalism and its Nexus to Responsibility to Protect. In: Human Rights Journalism and its Nexus to Responsibility to Protect. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49072-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics