Skip to main content
  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

It is argued that in the core Bubbleverse the concept of truth is inapplicable as it requires a comparison of phenomena with their rational constructions which in the core Bubbleverse are absent. Instead, phenomena can be classified by their existential statuses, as absolute (e.g., qualia), strong, incomplete and weak objects. The process of establishing existential statuses of objects (existentialisation) is described. Existentialisation is a basic process and cannot be reduced to thinking and perception. The distinction between true and false phenomena appears in the scientific Commonverse as a result of comparison between representing phenomena (e.g., concepts or theories) and their perceived prototypes: scientists believe that a concept or a theory is true when it fits the observable facts and false when it doesn’t.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Donaldson, J., & Macpherson, F. (2017). Impossible triangle. In Macpherson, F. (Ed.), The Illusions Index. Retrieved from https://www.illusionsindex.org/i/impossible-triangle

  2. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3 1/2- and 4 1/2-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, A. H., Faller, J. E., & Nordtvedt, K. L. (2019). Gravity. Encyclopaedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, Z., & Kimble, H. J. (1994). Observation of a single atom in a magneto-optical trap. Optics Letters, 22, 1888–1890. Retrieved from https://www.osapublishing.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-19-22-1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheldrake, R. (2015). Darwinian inheritance and the evolution of evolutionary theory. Retrieved from http://opensciences.org/blogs/open-sciences-blog/darwinian-inheritance-and-the-evolution-of-evolutionary-theory

  6. Penfield, W. (1975). The mystery of the mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Subbotsky, E., Hysted, C., & Jones, N. (2009). Watching films with magical content facilitates creativity in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Subbotsky, E., & Slater, E. (2011). Children’s discrimination of fantastic vs realistic visual displays after watching a film with magical content. Psychological Reports, 112, 603–609.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Subbotsky, E., & Matthews, J. (2011). Magical thinking and memory: Distinctiveness effect for TV advertisements with magical content. Psychological Reports, 109, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, C., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Profitt, D. R. (2011). Putting like a pro: The role of positive contagion in golf performance and perception. PLoS one, 6. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0026016

  11. Galbraith, J. K. (2009). The Great Crash 1929. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kakutani, M. (2018). The death of truth. New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Del Vicario, M., et al. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 3, 554–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panke, S., & Stephens, J. (2018). Beyond the echo chamber: Pedagogical tools for civic engagement discourse and reflection. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 248–263.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pariser, E. (2011). Beware online “filter bubbles”. TED: Ideas worth spreading. Retrieved from www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subbotsky, E. (2020). Truth in the Bubbleverse. In: The Bubble Universe: Psychological Perspectives on Reality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49008-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics