Abstract
The complex relationship of our Self to our body is discussed in the context of psychological and clinical research. Various cases of dissociation between conscious intentions and the behavior are described. Philosophical problems connected to the concept of Self, such as homunculus paradox, are raised, and theories alternative to the concept of Self as a Central Agent of consciousness are presented, such as Dennett & Kinsbourne’s ‘Multiple Drafts Model’. Psychological experiments are reviewed that aimed at examining of whether consciousness can be comprehended as a ‘pandemonium’ of multiple drafts or it requires a Central Agent (Self) capable of making executive decisions. The theory is proposed of the gradual development of Self in a human individual and illustrated with developmental experiments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Dissolving one’s Self shouldn’t be confused with transcending one’s Bubbleverse through faith (see Chap. 15). Unlike transcending, dissolving one’s Self occurs entirely within one’s Bubbleverse.
References
Lynn, S. J., et al. (2012). Dissociative disorders. In M. Hersen & D. C. Beidel (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (pp. 497–538). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Stevenson, R. L. (2017). The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. London: Chump Change.
Petkova, V., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLOS ONE. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0003832
Quallo, M. M., Price, C. J., Ueno, K., Asamizuya, T., Cheng, K., Lemon, R. N., & Iriki, A. (2009). Grey and white matter changes associated with tool-use learning in macaque monkeys. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences U S A, 27, 18379–18384.
Peeters, R., et al. (2009). The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: Common and uniquely human features. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11523–11539.
Levenson, J. L. (2006). Essentials of psychosomatic medicine. New York: American Psychiatric Press Inc..
MacIver, K., Lloyd, D. M., Kelly, S., Roberts, N., & Nurmikko, T. (2008). Phantom limbpain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain, 131, 2181–2191.
Banks, G., Short, P., Martinez, J., Latchaw, R., Ratcliff, G., & Boller, F. (1989). The alien hand syndrome. Clinical and postmortem findings. Archives of Neurology, 46, 456–459.
Sergio, D. S. (2005). The anarchic hand. The Psychologist, 18, 606–609. Retrieved from https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-18/edition-10/anarchic-hand.
Rock, A. (2009). The mind at night. The new science of how and why we dream. New York: Basic Books.
Gregory, R. L. (1987). The Oxford companion to the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, E. (2005). Tales from Baron Munchausen. Edinburg: Mariscat Press.
Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, J.A, & Rosenfeld, E. (1988). Neurocomputing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carruthers, P. (2011). The opacity of mind: An integrative theory of self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. C., & Kinsbourne, M. (1992). Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 183–247.
Subbotsky, E. (1996). Explaining impossible phenomena: Object permanence beliefs and memory failures in adults. Memory, 1996(4), 199–233.
Bower, T. G. R. (1974). Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman.
Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence. Child Development, 62, 1227–1246.
Michotte, A. (1950). A propos de la permanence phenomenale: Faits et theories [Concerning phenomenal permanence: Facts and theories]. Acta Psychologica, 7, 293–322.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Luria, A. R., & Subbotski, E. V. (1978). Zur frühen Ontogenese der Steuernden Funktion Der Sprache. In G. Steiner (Ed.), Die Psychologie des 20 Jahrhunderts (pp. 1033–1048). München: Kindler.
Subbotsky, E. (1993). The birth of personality. The development of independent and moral behaviour in preschool children. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Weatsheaf.
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-Mind. Child Development, 3, 655–684.
Batson, C. D., & Thompson, E. R. (2001). Why don’t moral people act morally? Motivational considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 54–57.
Likhachev, D. (2013). Mysli o zhizni. Pis'ma o dobrom. Moscow: Kolibri.
Toch, H. (1988). Psychology of crowds revisited. Contemporary Psychology, 33, 954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Subbotsky, E. (2020). Self in Multiple Universes. In: The Bubble Universe: Psychological Perspectives on Reality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49008-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49008-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49007-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49008-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)