Skip to main content

What and Why of the Bubbleverse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Bubble Universe: Psychological Perspectives on Reality
  • 199 Accesses

Abstract

A definition of the Bubbleverse is given and explained in detail, by contrasting it to a commonverse. Problems with introducing the concept of the Bubbleverse are discussed. Advantages of ‘thinking the Bubbleverse’ over the theoretical tenets of scientific Commonverse are presented. The argument is made that for scientific concepts to become possible, the innate ideas supplied by our Bubbleverse such as qualia, laws of logic, numbers, basic geometrical shapes and others are a necessary precondition. It is on the basis of the intuitive ideas supplied by the subconscious part of the Bubbleverse that the fundamental concepts of sciences, such as physical space, time and causality, rest. It is shown that thinking the Bubbleverse helps us to expose psychological roots of scientific theories and suggests a solution for the dispute between religion and science. The relationships between the intuitive ideas of the Bubbleverse and the concepts of scientific Commonverse are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The idea that a quantum object, such as a photon or an electrone, cannot be defined as a particle or a wave before it is observed by a person.

References

  1. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). Phenomenology of spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shchedrovitsky, G. (2004). Na doskakh. Publitchnie lektsii po philosophii G.P.Schedrovitskogo. Moscow: Shkola Kulturnoj Politiki.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kragh, H. (2009). Contemporary history of cosmology and the controversy over the multiverse. Annals of Science, 66, 529–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Penrose, R. (1989). The emperor’s new mind. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tegmark, M. (1997). The interpretation of quantum mechanics: Many worlds or many words? Fortschritte der Physik, 46, 855–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moody, R. (1975). Life after life: The investigation of a phenomenon—Survival of bodily death. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mauro, J. (1992). Bright lights, big mystery. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199207/bright-lights-big-mystery

  9. Holden, J. M., Greyson, B., & James, D. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of near-death experiences: Thirty years of investigation. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gerson, L. (2018). Plotinus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plotinus/#ThreFundPrinPlotMeta

  11. Collins, S. (1998). Nirvana and other Buddhist felicities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Day, J. M. (1994). Plato’s Meno in focus. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slater, A., Morison, V., & Rose, D. (1982). Visual memory at birth. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55, 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Slater, A., & Bremner, G. (2003). An introduction to developmental psychology. New York: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nagel, T. (1989). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davies, P. (1992). The mind of god. The scientific basis for a rational world. New York: Orion Production.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Bostock, D. (1988). Plato’s Theaetetus. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shestov, L. (2007). Potestas Clavium. Moscow: Act.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baggini, J. (2016). The edge of reason: A rational skeptic in an irrational world. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against method. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin, D. R. (Ed.). (1988). The reenchantment of science: Postmodern proposals. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Laszlo, E. (2006). Science and the reenchantment of the Cosmos: The rise of the integral vision of reality (Kindle ed.). Rochester: Inner Traditions.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous. Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thornton, S. (2018). Karl Popper. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/#ProbKnowVeri

  29. Feyerabend, P. (1963). Materialism and the mind-body problem. Review of Metaphysics, 17, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wittgenstein, L. (2018). Logico-Philosophskii Tractat. Moscow: Act.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shtulman, A. (2017). Scienceblind: Why our intuitive theories about the world are so often wrong. (Kindle ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Subbotsky, E. (2000). Phenomenalistic perception and rational understanding in the mind of an individual: A fight for dominance. In K. S. Rosengren, C. N. Johnson, & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Imagining the impossible. Magical Scientific and religious thinking in children (pp. 35–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Subbotsky, E. (2004). Magical thinking in judgments of causation: Can anomalous phenomena affect ontological causal beliefs in children and adults? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. James, W. (2009). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/microcosm

  37. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmaltz, T. M. (2002). Radical Cartesianism: The French reception of Descartes. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Kant, I. (2018). Kritika Chistogo Razuma. Moscow: Act.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subbotsky, E. (2020). What and Why of the Bubbleverse. In: The Bubble Universe: Psychological Perspectives on Reality. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49008-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics