Skip to main content

Evaluating Long-Term Sustainability of Supply Chains Using An Evolutionary Game Theory Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Supply Chains: Strategies, Issues, and Models

Abstract

Sustainability in supply chains is typically studied across one or more dimensions such as environmental, social, economic, culture and governance. Traditionally sustainability in supply chains has focused on environmental dimensions, while a few have attempted to focus on social and economic dimensions without really integrating them. There has been only a small effort to define sustainability by integrating all relevant dimensions (a holistic approach). Our model proposes to fill this gap. We identify sustainability of a supply chain with the equilibrium of the system over a long (but finite) period of time after integrating the various dimensions. Thus, it necessitates looking at factors that can cause a shift in the equilibrium. Towards this, we propose to build a strong theoretical framework to integrate, explain and predict sustainability for supply chains using cross-disciplinary effort. In our theoretical framework, evolutionary game theory serves as the pure conceptual theory-building tool, the metrics are qualitative in nature and the indicators are quantitative statistical measures. The use of evolutionary game theory concepts allows us to understand how sometimes trivial actions by members of the supply chain can trigger cascading effects that can move the system away from equilibrium. One of the salient aspects of our model is its complete scalability in terms of changes to the dimensions and metrics. As an example, we explain and predict social and economic sustainability (in tandem) for a public health insurance supply chain using evolutionary game theory.

Sujatha Babu—Work done during the scholar’s stay in IIT Madras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleby, J., & Phillips, M. (2009). The NHS: Satisfied now? British Social Attitudes: The 25th Report, SAGE Publications (pp. 25–54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, G., & Porteus, E. L. (2009). Manufacturer to retailer versus manufacturer to consumer rebates in a supply chain. In N. Agrawal & S. A. Smith (Eds.), Retail supply chain management (Vol. 122, pp. 237–270)., International Series in Operations Research and Management Science US: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Babu, S., & Mohan, U. (2017). An integrated approach to evaluating sustainability in supply chains using evolutionary game theroy. Computer & Operations Research, 89, 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barari, S., Agarwal, G., Zhang, W. J. C., Mahanty, B., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach. Expert systems with applications, 39(3), 2965–2976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 299–312.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L. R. (2002). The health care value chain: Producers, purchasers and providers—Chapter 1. A Wiley Company, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., & Netessine, S. (2006). Game theory in supply chain analysis. In Models, Methods, and Applications for Innovative Decision Making, INFORMS, 200–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P., & Zipkin, P. H. (1999). Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management science, 45(7), 936–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Managemen, 38(5), 360–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A. K. (2014). Supply chain transformation—Chapter 10, Springer Texts in Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. (2000). Sales-force incentives and inventory management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2, 186–202. April.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. (2005). Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning. Management Science, 51, 60–75. January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., McCardle, K. F., & Tang, C. S. (2009). Optimal pricing and rebate strategies in a two-level supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 18(4), 426–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2015). NHS hospital waiting times statistics, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, J., Parthasarathy, T., Thuijsman, F., & Uyttendaele, P. (2013). Evolutionary stochastic games. Dynamic Games and Applications, 3, 207–219.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, A., Rao, K. S. M., & Shaiju, A. J. (2012). Evolutionary stability against multiple mutations. Dynamic Games and Applications, 4, 376–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (2003). Evolutionary game dynamics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 40–4, 479–519.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leng, M., & Parlar, M. (2005). Game theoretic applications in supply chain management: A review. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 43(3), 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Du, W., Yang, F., & Hua, G. (2013). The research on evolutionary game of remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain under asymmetric situation. In LTLGB 2012 (pp. 473–479), Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, M., & SoÅ¡ić, G. (2008). Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 719–745.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Naini, S. G. J., Aliahmadi, A. R., & Jafari-Eskandari, M. (2011). Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: A case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resources, conservation and recycling, 55(6), 593–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS. (2015). NHS patient safety, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office For National Statistics. (2015). NHS hospital productivity efficiency, 2010. Retrieved April, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, W. (2011). Population games and evolutionary dynamics (economic learning and social evolution) (1st edn.), The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, K. (1994). Evolution in partnership games, an equivalence result. Discussion Paper Serie B (p. 298). Germany: University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S. (2013). A review of modelling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 54–4, 1513–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. (1953). Stochastic games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 39, 1095–1100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. D., & Jonker, L. (1978). Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40, 145–156.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q.-H., & Dou, Y.-J. (2007). Evolutionary game model between governments and core enterprises in greening supply chains. Systems engineering-theory & practice, 27(12), 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data in the tables and figures in Sects.  4 and 5 are reprinted from Babu and Mohan (2017) with the permission from Elsevier

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usha Mohan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Babu, S., Mohan, U. (2020). Evaluating Long-Term Sustainability of Supply Chains Using An Evolutionary Game Theory Framework. In: Ramanathan, U., Ramanathan, R. (eds) Sustainable Supply Chains: Strategies, Issues, and Models. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48876-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48876-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48875-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48876-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics