Skip to main content

Educational Innovation: Challenges of Conducting and Applying Research in Schools

Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

Our school students’ world is constantly changing, driven from both inside and outside the educational arena. Although teachers in schools are accustomed to having to accommodate such change, however difficult it might be for them to resolve it within the classroom context, researchers within this field are required to search for ways to minimise the impact whilst maximising the effectiveness of educational change so that they add meaning and provide specific assistance for teachers. Rather than standing still, this challenges us to be innovative and to make learning ever more relevant, challenging, inclusive, and rewarding. In this context, educational innovation refers to application of contemporary educational research to classroom curriculum and pedagogical practice. At the same time, it is appropriate to acknowledge that often teachers are not the researcher as their own school world provides little breathing space for the academic challenge needed, even though they are always at the forefront of any data collection and of putting ideas into practice. Hence researchers may be formulating information without being at the cutting edge of where their work will be utilised; that creates many issues of its own. Educational researchers within the school context, whether teachers or not, are required to have data-driven and evidence-informed solutions to resolve the issues so that teachers can get on with the job of leading learning. The challenge is how to continue to encourage and support teachers, who are at the heart of the educational system, to be responsive to the needs and demands of their multiple stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., Louis, K., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). Investigating the links to Improved Student Learning. Final Report on the Learning from Leadership Project to The Wallace Foundation, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, The University of Minnesota and Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/

  • Bastow, S., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2014). The impact of the social sciences: How academics and their research make a difference. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, R. J. (2013). Action research: Trends and variations. Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(3), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., & Clarke, A. (2011). Intergenerational learning in a teacher education context: The Jared Phenomenon. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2011.560652

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, M. (2011). The payback of ‘Payback’: Challenges in assessing research impact. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 259–260.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chelimsky, E. (2008). A clash of cultures: Improving the “fit” between evaluative independence and the political requirements of a democratic society. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 400–415.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruyn, R. L., & DeBruyn, T. (2009). Voices from the field: What is a master teacher? Manhattan, KA: The Master Teacher. List abstracted from the book: Top ten characteristics of a master teacher. Retrieved from https://blog.masterteacher.com/top-ten-characteristics-of-a-master-teacher/

  • DETE. (2016a). Master teacher administrative arrangements. Retrieved February 8, 2016, from http://education.qld.gov.au/staff/development/pdfs/master-teachers-admin-fact-sheet.pdf

  • DETE. (2016b). Master teachers fact sheet. Retrieved February 8, 2016, from http://education.qld.gov.au/staff/development/pdfs/master-teachers-fact-sheet.pdf

  • DETE. (2016c). Master teachers FAQs. Retrieved February 8, 2016, from http://education.qld.gov.au/staff/development/pdf/master-teachers-faqs.html

  • DETE. (2016d). Great teachers = Great results (GT=GR): Master teacher school identification. Retrieved February 8, 2016, from http://education.qld.gov.au/staff/development/pdfs/master-teachers-schools-identification.pdf

  • Doyle, J., & McDonald, L. (2016). Making an impact: Politics and persuasions in 21st century Higher Education. In K. Trimmer (Ed.), Political pressures on educational and social research: International perspectives (pp. 83–91). Oxon, UK: Routledge. isbn:978-1-138-94712-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1985). Effective teaching and the concept of master teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 86(1), 27–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Drysdale, L., & Gurr, D. (2012). Tensions and dilemmas in leading Australia’s schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(5), 403–420.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Education Labour Relations Council [ELRC], South Africa. (2008). Collective agreement number 1 of 2008: Occupation specific dispensation (OSD). Centurion, South Africa: ELRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flegg, N. (2007). Anxiety in school children toward the study of mathematics (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Curtin University of Technology, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2010). Political control: A way forward for educational research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(3), 378–389.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2003, January 5). From improvement to transformation. Keynote speech presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement ‘Schooling the Knowledge Society’ Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2011). What makes for a master teacher? Retrieved February 6, 2016, from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/master-teacher-definition-ben-johnson

  • Marginson, S. (2014). Game-playing of the REF makes it an incomplete census. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, A. (2008). The political context of evaluation: What does this mean for independence and objectivity? Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 8(2), 35–41.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, L., Lyall, C., & Nutley, S. (2008). Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: A method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Research Evaluation, 17(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208x331720

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Normand, R. (2016). “What works?”: From health to education, the shaping of the European policy of evidence. In K. Trimmer (Ed.), Political pressures on educational and social research: International perspectives (pp. 21–35). Oxon, UK: Routledge. isbn:978-1-138-94712-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Spaapen, J., & van Drooge, L. (2011). Introducing ‘productive interactions’ in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 211–218.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • State Board of Education, Ohio. (2007). Ohio master teacher program. Columbus, OH: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers. Retrieved from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode.

  • Timmer, C. P. (2004). Adding value through policy-oriented research: Reflections of a scholar-practitioner. What’s Economics Worth, 129–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S., Parr, J. M., & Bertannes, C. (2009). Promoting professional inquiry for improved outcomes for students in New Zealand. Professional Development in Education, 35(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580802550094

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K. (2015). Evaluation as an educational development to improve practice: Teacher ICT knowledge, skills and integration. In P. Redmond, J. Lock, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Educational developments, practices and effectiveness: Global perspectives and contexts (pp. 93–110). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K. (2016). The pressures within: dilemmas in the conduct of evaluation from within government. In K. Trimmer (Ed.), Political pressures on educational and social research: International perspectives (pp. 180–191). Oxon, UK: Routledge. isbn:978-1-138-94712-2.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmer, K., Donovan, J., Findlay, Y. S., & Mohamed, K. (2017). Master teachers as leaders in school-based action research. Leading & Managing, 23(2), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, B., Lindenthal, T., Szerencsits, M., Holbrook, J. B., & Heß, J. (2013). Evaluating research beyond scientific impact: How to include criteria for productive interactions and impact on practice and society. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 104–114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Trimmer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trimmer, K., Donovan, J., Flegg, N. (2020). Educational Innovation: Challenges of Conducting and Applying Research in Schools. In: Donovan, J., Trimmer, K., Flegg, N. (eds) Curriculum, Schooling and Applied Research. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48822-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48822-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48821-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48822-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)