Abstract
Practice, policy and management constitute complex and interdependent domains of theory and action in contemporary educational settings. This is certainly the case in schools, which are widely recognised as sites of ongoing change (Connolly, James, & Beales, 2011; Holmes, Clement, & Albright, 2013; Spiro & Crisfield, 2018), and as the intersection of competing priorities and pressures (Hardy, 2013; Petriwskyj, 2013; Pollock & Winton, 2012). Likewise, universities exhibit continuing change (Christensen, Gornitzka, & Ramirez, 2019; Goedegebuure & Schoen, 2014), and operate in environments of uncertainty (Gayle, Tewarie, & White, 2003).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Albright, J., Hartman, D., & Widin, J. (Eds.). (2018). Bourdieu’s field theory and the social sciences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847501400602
Bourdieu, P. (1987). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38(5), 814–853. Retrieved from https://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2905&context=hastings_law_journal
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field (Trans. L. J. D. Wacquant & S. Farage). Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1–18.
Bourdieu, P. (1996a). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field (Trans. S. Emanuel). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996b). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power (Trans. L. C. Clough). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544
Burns, J. P. (2018). Power, curriculum, and embodiment: Re-thinking curriculum as counter-conduct and counter-politics (Curriculum studies worldwide). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chan, C. (2015). Tensions and complexities in school–university collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2014.906386
Christensen, T., Gornitzka, Å., & Ramirez, F. O. (Eds.). (2019). Universities as agencies: Reputation and professionalization (Public sector organizations). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Connolly, M., James, C., & Beales, B. (2011). Contrasting perspectives on organizational culture change in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 12(4), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9166-x
Cornelissen, F., Daly, A. J., Liou, Y.-H., van Swet, J., Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2014). More than a master: Developing, sharing, and using knowledge in school–university research networks. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.855170
Danaher, P. A. (2015). Forms of capital and transition pedagogies: Researching to learn among postgraduate students and early career academics at an Australian university. In C. Guerin, P. Bartholomew, & C. Nygaard (Eds.), Learning to research—Researching to learn (The learning in higher education series) (pp. 219–239). Faringdon, UK: Libri Publishing.
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gayle, D. J., Tewarie, B., & White, A. Q. (Eds.). (2003). Governance in the twenty-first-century university: Approaches to effective leadership and strategic management (ASHE ERIC higher education report vol. 30 no. 1). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Gazeley, L., Marrable, T., Brown, C., & Boddy, J. (2013). Reducing inequalities in school exclusion: Learning from good practice (A report to the Office of the Children’s Commissioner from the Centre for Innovation and Research in Childhood and Youth). Brighton, UK: School of Education and Social Work, University of Sussex. Retrieved from https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=reducing-inequalities-in-school-exclusion%2D%2D-learning-from-good-practice.pdf&site=319
Goedegebuure, L., & Schoen, M. (2014). Middle management in the university of the future—An Australian perspective. In C. Scholz & V. Stein (Eds.), The dean in the university of the future (pp. 127–135). Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Hardy, I. (2013). Competing pressures in practice: Teachers’ pedagogies and work under complex policy conditions. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(3), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2013.8.3.206
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY and Toronto, ON: Teachers College Press and the Ontario Principals’ Council.
Harrison, K. (2017). Shakespeare, Bakhtin, and film. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hartas, D. (Ed.). (2015). Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hartle, R. T., Smith, R., Adkison, S., Williams, D. J., & Beardsley, P. (2011). Beyond educator/practitioner binaries: Overcoming barriers to cooperation using professional cultural axes. In W. Midgley, M. A. Tyler, P. A. Danaher, & A. Mander (Eds.), Beyond binaries in education research (Routledge research in education vol. 59) (pp. 242–257). New York, NY: Routledge.
Holmes, K., Clement, J., & Albright, J. (2013). The complex task of leading educational change in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.800477
Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu (key sociologists) (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Joffe, H. (2011). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119973249.ch15
Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. C. (2011). The democratic deficit and school-based management in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116725
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212464511
Martin, S. D., Snow, J. L., & Franklin Torrez, C. A. (2011). Navigating the terrain of third space: Tensions with/in relationships in school–university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110396096
Matthews, K. J., & Danaher, P. A. (2015). Mainstreaming margins: Analysing the knowledge of an Australian university education research team. In K. Trimmer, A. L. Black, & S. Riddle (Eds.), Mainstreams, margins and the spaces in-between: New possibilities for education research (Routledge research in education vol. 130) (pp. 50–65). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Moolenaar, N. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/667715
Petriwskyj, A. (2013). Pedagogies of inclusive transition to school. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(3), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911303800307
Pollock, K., & Winton, S. (2012). School improvement: A case of competing priorities! Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(3), 22–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458912447840
Rainer, P., Cropley, B., Jarvis, S., & Griffiths, R. (2012). From policy to practice: The challenges of providing high quality physical education and school sport faced by head teachers within primary schools. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.603125
Scheerens, J. (2014). Evidence based educational policy and practice: The case of applying the educational effectiveness knowledge base. Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 9, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-009-sche
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications.
Spiro, J., & Crisfield, E. (2018). Linguistic and cultural innovation in schools: The languages challenge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swartz, D. L. (2013). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge gratefully the constructive feedback about earlier versions of this chapter provided by the book’s editors, an anonymous peer reviewer and participants in the writing workshops related to the book’s development, which has enhanced the clarity and readability of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harris, D., Danaher, P.A. (2020). Developing Dialogue between a School Subject Department Head and a University Education Researcher: Convergences and Divergences in Experiencing Educational Change and Complexity. In: Donovan, J., Trimmer, K., Flegg, N. (eds) Curriculum, Schooling and Applied Research. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48822-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48822-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48821-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48822-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)