Skip to main content

Cavitation Model Parameter Calibration for Simulations of Three-Phase Injector Flows

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantification of Uncertainty: Improving Efficiency and Technology

Abstract

A stochastic sensitivity analysis and calibration of the cavitation model parameters in the URANS simulations of a configuration representative of high-pressure injectors for automotive applications is carried out. A popular homogeneous-flow cavitation model is considered, in which the mass transfer due to cavitation is given by the Schnerr–Sauer model together with the classical Rayleigh–Plesset equation. A stochastic approach based on the generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) expansion is adopted, which allows continuous response surfaces of the quantities of interest in the parameter space to be obtained starting from a few deterministic simulations. The considered uncertain parameters are the so-called scaling factors. The calibration of these parameters is carried out by using the gPC response surfaces for a axisymmetric simplified geometry against the experimental value of the critical cavitation point, i.e. the condition at which the injector is choked. The procedure is carried out for two different turbulence models, viz. the k − ω SST and RSM models. The so-obtained optimal parameter set-ups are then validated for the real three-dimensional geometry. The k − ω SST optimal set-up gives very accurate predictions also in the three-dimensional case. Finally, the results obtained with this optimal set-up are compared to those given by standard values, confirming that the predictions of the different flow regimes occurring in high-pressure injectors are highly sensitive to cavitation model parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Altimira, M., Fuchs, L.: Numerical investigation of throttle flow under cavitating conditions. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 75, 124–136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.05.006

  2. Anderlini A., Salvetti, M.V., Agresta, A., Matteucci, L.: Stochastic sensitivity analysis of numerical simulations of high-pressure injectors to cavitation modeling parameters. In: Proceedings of ASME-FEDSM2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2017-69212

  3. Bergwerk, W.: Flow pattern in diesel nozzle spray holes. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 173, 655–660 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blessing, M., König, G., Krüger, C., Michels, U., Schwarz, V.: Analysis of flow and cavitation phenomena in diesel injection nozzles and its effect on spray and mixture formation. In: Proceedings of SAE 2003 World Congress and Exhibition (2003). https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-1358

  5. Brennen, C.E.: Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cazzoli, G., Falfari, S., Bianchi, G.M., Forte, C., Catellani, C.: Assessment of the cavitation models implemented in OpenFOAM under DI-like conditions. Energy Proc. 101, 638–645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.081

  7. Chaves, H., Knapp, M., Kubitzek, A., Obermeier, F., Schneider, T.: Experimental study of cavitation in the nozzle hole of diesel injectors using transparent nozzles. SAE technical paper (1995). https://doi.org/10.4271/950290

  8. Goncalves, E., Patella, R.F.: Numerical simulation of cavitating flows with homogeneous models. Comput. Fluids 38, 1682–1696 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.03.001

  9. Kiplimo, R., Tomita, E., Kawahara, N., Yokobe, S.: Effects of spray impingement, injection parameters, and EGR on the combustion and emission characteristics of a PCCI diesel engine. Appl. Thermal Eng. 37, 165–175 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J., Rodi, W.: Progress in the development of a Reynolds-Stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menter, F.R.: Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32, 1598–1605 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nurick, W.H.: Orifice cavitation and its effect on spray mixing. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME 98, 681–687 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orley, F., Trummler, T., Hickel, S., Mihatsch, M.S., Schmidt, S.J., Adams, N.A.: Large-Eddy simulation of cavitating nozzle flow and primary jet break-up. Phys. Fluids 27, 086101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928701

  14. Payri, R., Guardiola, C., Salvador, F.J., Gimeno, J.: Critical cavitation number determination in diesel injection nozzles. Exp. Tech. 28, 49–52 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sauer, J., Schnerr, G.H.: Unsteady cavitating flow—a new cavitation model based on a modified front capturing method and bubble dynamics. In: Proceedings of the ASME-FEDSM2000, vol. 251, pp. 1073–1076 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soteriou, C.C.E., Andrews, R., Smith, M.: Direct injection diesel sprays and the effect of cavitation and hydraulic flip on atomization. SAE technical paper 950080 (1995). https://doi.org/10.4271/950080

  17. Sou, A., Tomiyama, A., Hosokawa, S., Nigorikawa, S., Maeda, T.: Cavitation in a two-dimensional nozzle and liquid jet atomization. JSME Int. J. B Fluids Thermal Eng. 49, 1253–1259 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. STAR-CCM+ : Users Manual. http://www.cd-adapco.com/products/star-ccmdocumentation

  19. Tree, D.R., Svensson, K.I.: Soot processes in compression ignition engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 33, 272–309 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Venkatakrishnan, V.: On the convergence of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions. AIAA J. (1993) https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-880

  21. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.E.: The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 619–644 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Anderlini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, and The Editor(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anderlini, A., Salvetti, M.V., Agresta, A., Matteucci, L. (2020). Cavitation Model Parameter Calibration for Simulations of Three-Phase Injector Flows. In: D'Elia, M., Gunzburger, M., Rozza, G. (eds) Quantification of Uncertainty: Improving Efficiency and Technology. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 137 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48721-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics