Skip to main content

Stewardship of Intersectionality: A Complex Proposition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Considered

Part of the book series: Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences ((GSSS))

Abstract

This chapter argues that intersectionality is both a way of understanding and a tool for social transformation created by and for women of color. Beginning in the mid-1800s, it takes up the issues of how we might think about intersectionality as a critical theory and an emergent field of study. The chapter poses the following questions: what are the political implications of boundary-drawing while preserving feminist commitments to freedom and gender equality and what does intersectionality’s complex evolution tells us about power, feminism’s fundamental unit of analysis? The chapter calls for feminist scholars’ stewardship of this important contribution of Women’s & Gender Studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following Iris Marion Young (1997) and her engagement with Sartre, I nevertheless am able to build intersectionality further by adding certain aspects from DuBois to its liberatory aims.

  2. 2.

    Along with other articles Nieto-Gómez’s landmark “La Feminista” was reprinted in Alma Garcia’s anthology Chicana Feminist Thought (1974/1997).

References

  • Alexander-Floyd, Nikol. 2012. Disappearing Acts: Reclaiming Intersectionality in the Social Sciences in a Post-Black Feminist Era. Feminist Formations 24 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Michele Tracy, and Kathleen Guidroz, eds. 2009. The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy Through Race, Class and Gender. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, Sirma. 2013. Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies. Du Bois Review 10 (2): 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carby, Hazel. 1998. Race Men: The W.E.B. Du Bois Lectures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Robert and Jerome Culp. 2002. After Intersectionality. UMKC Law Review 71 (2): 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Sumi K., Kimberle Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. 2013. Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications and Praxis. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 785–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, Hae Yeon, and Myra Marx Ferree. 2010. Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequality. Sociological Theory 28 (2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill and Sirma Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. ([1977] 1993). A Black Feminist Statement. In All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, but Some of Us Are Brave: Black Women’s Studies, ed. Gloria Hull, Patricia Bell Scott and Barbara Smith, 13–22. New York: Feminist Press at CUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kathy. 2008. Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, Bonnie Thornton, and Ruth Enid Zambrana, eds. 2009. Emerging Intersections: Race, Class, and Gender in Theory, Policy and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Alma, ed. 1997. Chicana Feminist Thought: The Basic Historical Writings. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Farah Jasmine. 2000. Black Feminists and Du Bois: Respectability, Protection, and Beyond. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 568: 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Empirical Intersectionality: A Tale of Two Approaches. University of California Irvine Law Review 3: 259–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Intersectionality: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesworth, Mary. 2006. Feminist Inquiry: From Political Conviction to Methodological Innovation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Melanie. 2011. Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women’s Political Representation Worldwide. American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Zachery, Julia. 2007. Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who is Black? A Few Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality. Politics and Gender 3 (2): 254–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Vivian. 2015. Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, Cherrie, and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. 1983. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings By Radical Women of Color. New York: Kitchen Table Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Jennifer. 2008. Re-thinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review 89, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Marilyn, ed. 1987. Maria W. Stewart, America’s First Black Woman Political Writer. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, Naomi. 2005. Inclusive Feminism: A Third Wave Theory of Women’s Commonality. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ange-Marie Hancock Alfaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hancock Alfaro, AM. (2020). Stewardship of Intersectionality: A Complex Proposition. In: Fenstermaker, S., Stewart, A.J. (eds) Gender, Considered. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48501-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48501-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48500-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48501-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics