Skip to main content

A Factor Analysis of Transportation Infrastructure Feasibility Study Factors: A Study Among Built Environment Professionals in South Africa

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology

Abstract

Feasibility studies conducted at the initiation stage of transportation infrastructure projects inform decision-making regarding the proposed project’s development. However, non-comprehensive feasibility studies lead to project failure at the operational stage. This study, therefore, investigated the critical factors that should be incorporated in a comprehensive feasibility study in order to make reliable investment decisions, which will, in turn, affect the performance at a later stage. Empirical data collected from 132 built environment professionals in South Africa, were analysed to output descriptive and inferential statistics. The inferential statistics entailed factor analysis. Outputs were common factors and the minimum number of variables that contributed the most variance in the data set. Findings revealed that a six-factor structure including methods of appraisal, finance availability and source, user needs, local environment, available data and strategic support. By establishing critical factors to consider during the planning of infrastructure to ensure that a comprehensive feasibility study is achieved, the current study provides valuable evidence for transportation infrastructure stakeholders to make informed and reliable decisions about the worthwhileness of the projects they intend to invest in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB. (2005). Financial management and analysis of projects. Retrieved February 6, 2019, from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/31339/financial-governance-management.pdf.

  • Al-Masaeid, H. R., & Al-Omoush, N. J. (2014). Traffic volume forecasting in rural roads in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(3), 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMC Consultants. (2017). Why feasibility studies fail. Retrieved July 26, 2018, from https://amcconsultants.com/experience/why-feasibility-studies-fail/.

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2013). Issues in road maintenance. Annual Evaluation Review. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from www.adb.org>linked-documents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bueno, P. C., Vassallo, J. M., & Chueng, K. (2015). Sustainability assessment of transport infrastructure projects: A review of tools and methods. Transport Reviews, 35(5), 622–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, R., & Otto, A. (2013). The role of infrastructure in macroeconomic growth theories. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 30(3–4), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, Y. (2016). Indicators and beyond: Assessing the sustainability of transport projects. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osbourne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P. K. (2001). Integrated approach to project feasibility analysis: A case study. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, T. (2014). Understanding the challenges for infrastructure finance (BIS Working Papers No 454). Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved June 16, 2019, from https://www.bis.org/publ/work454.pdf.

  • Erlich, R. (2015, February 25). Controversy runs deep in Nicaragua’s canal plan. Aljazeera America. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/2/nicaragua-launches-worlds-largest-infrastructure-project.html.

  • Etemadnia, H., & Abdelghany, K. (2011). A distributed origin-destination demand estimation approach for real-time traffic network management. Transportation Planning and 325 Technology, 34(3), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, C., & Reichl, J. (2016). Realising energy infrastructure projects: A qualitative empirical analysis of local practices to address social acceptance. Energy Policy, 89(184–353), 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gausden, C., & Miskimmin, I. (2018). BIM 4 FM webinar. CIOB

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskeicius, A., & Griskeviciute-Geciene, A. (2008). The analysis of the construction costs of transport infrastructure projects. The 8th International Conference on Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication, 15–18 October 2008, Riga, Latvia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaister, S. Allport, R., Brown, R., & Travers, T. (2010). Success and failure in urban transport infrastructure projects. KPMG International. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/centre-for-transport-studies/Success-and-Failure-in-Urban-Transport-Infrastructure-Projects.pdf.

  • Hampton, L. (2009). An introduction to financing airport infrastructure in the USA and elsewhere. Airport Management, 3(4), 320–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S., Arroyo, J., Galan, J. M., Antunes, L., & Pavon, J. (2013). Asking the Oracle: Introducing forecasting principles into agent-based modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(3), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyari, K., & Kandil, A. (2009). Validity of feasibility studies for infrastructure contrition projects. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(1), 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeerangsuwan, T., Said, H., Kandil, A., & Ukkusuri, S. (2014). Financial evaluation for toll projects considering traffic volume and serviceability interactions. Journal of Infrastructure 318 Systems, 20(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatleli, N. (2016). The impediments to efficient megaproject implementation in South Africa. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 803–812, 5–7 September 2016, Manchester, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabugu, R. E. (2016). Responding to South Africa’s infrastructure challenges. In Submission for the 2016/17 Division of Revenue. Retrieved June 16, 2019, from https://www.ffc.co.za/docman-menu-item/commission-submissions/929-2016-2017-chapter-1-responding-to-south-africas-infrastructural-challenges.

  • Mackenzie, W., & Cusworth, N. (2007). The use and abuse of feasibility studies. Project Evaluation Conference, 19–20 June 2007, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matti, S., Dai, H., Fujimori, S., Hanaoka, T., & Zhang, R. (2017). Key factors influencing the global passenger transport dynamics using the AIM/transport model. Transportation Research Part D, 55, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mišic, S., & Radujković, M. (2015). Critical drivers of megaproject success and failure. Procedia Engineering, 122, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen, M. S., Ambrasaite, I., & Salling, K. M. (2012). Forecasts: Uncertain, inaccurate and biased? Proceedings of the Annual Transport Conference. Aalborg University, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoro, C. S., Musonda, I., & Agumba, J. N. (2016). Critical considerations in transport service demand forecasting: A literature review. In DII-2016 Conference on Infrastructure Development and Investment Strategies for Africa, 31 August–2 September 2016, Livingstone, Zambia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okoro, C. S., Musonda, I., & Agumba, J. N. (2017). Feasibility study considerations for transport infrastructure performance: A desk study. In The Ninth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-9), March 5–7, 2017, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi, P., & Levinson, D. (2010). Post construction evaluation of traffic forecast accuracy. Transport Policy, 17(6), 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quium, A. S. M. A. (2014). The institutional environment for sustainable transport development. UNESCAP. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Article%204_Institutional%20environment%20for%20sustainable%20transport%20development.pdf.

  • Roxas, N. R., Fillone, A., & Chalermpong, S. (2015). Cost overruns and the proposed Panay-Guimaras-Negros Inter-Island Bridge project, Philippines. JTLE, 3(1), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudžianskaitė-Kvaraciejienė, R., Apanavičiene, R., & Gelžinis, A. (2015). Monitoring the effectiveness of PPP road infrastructure projects by applying random forests. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(3), 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W. Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects. International Journal of Urban and 304 Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salling, K. M., & Leleur, S. (2012). Modelling of transport project uncertainties: Feasibility risk assessment and scenario analysis. EJTIR, 12(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2012). Multiple-case study methods in governance-related research. Public Management Review, 14(1), 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsimplokoukout, K., Sfakianaki, E., & Metaxas, G. (2012). A feasibility study approach for underground railways—A case study: Line 4 of Athens metro. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 14(1), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chioma Sylvia Okoro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okoro, C.S., Musonda, I., Agumba, J.N. (2021). A Factor Analysis of Transportation Infrastructure Feasibility Study Factors: A Study Among Built Environment Professionals in South Africa. In: Ahmed, S.M., Hampton, P., Azhar, S., D. Saul, A. (eds) Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics