Managing quality has traditionally been problematic. A new conceptual framework, Readiness, Growth, Rest (RGR) has been developed with the intention of managing quality in construction. Various options were identified to elicit views from the construction industry with regard to the relevance of this framework. A new framework referred to as the SAF framework has been developed for evaluation of the options within the research paradigm selecting semi-structured interviews as the basis for proceeding with this study. In order to pursue further, this study reports the use of the Six-Honest-Men framework as the guiding light for framing questions on RGR model concepts.
- Quality management
- RGR framework
- SAF framework
- Six-honest-men framework
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Abeysekera, V., & Shelke, M. (). Construction as biological cells: an exploratory study. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(4).
Abeysekera, V., & Shelke, M. (2018). The Journey of Exploring ‘Construction as Biological Cells’ for Improving Construction Quality: Aritculating the research paradigm. In: The Tenth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-10). Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Abeysekera, V., & Shelke, M. G. (). Reviewing and Refining the RGR Model for Quality Management: A Generic Blueprint. In: CITC 2019: Construction in the 21st Century 11th International Conference (CITC-11). London, UK.
Abeysekera, V. (1997). Strategies for managing Sri Lankan Brickwork. Department of Civil Engineering, Loughborough University UK. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/handle/2134/6991.
Abeysekera, V. (2008). Building theory for the built environment: The case of monetary retentions (Keynote Address). In: International Conference in Building Education and Research—CIB W89. Kandalama, Sri Lanka: Salford University (UK) and EURASIA.
Barbara, B. K. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2).
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications.
Gill, P., et al. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291.
Görener, A., Toker, K., & Ulucay, K. (2012). Application of combined SWOT and AHP: A case study for a manufacturing firm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525–1534.
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251.
Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Wiley-Blackwell.
Johnson, G., & Scholes, J. (1999). Exploring corporate strategy. London: Prentice Hall.
Josephson, P.-E., Larsson, B., & Li, H. (2002). Illustrative benchmarking rework and rework costs in Swedish construction industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18(2), 76.
Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474.
Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative research methods.
Love, P. E., Teo, P., & Morrison, J. (2017). Revisiting quality failure costs in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 05017020.
Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194–203.
Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London.
Ritchie, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, J. Ritchie, and J. Lewis (Eds.). London: Sage Publications.
Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W. Jr, & Lasorsa, D. L. (2003). How to build social science theories. Sage publications.
Sloane, P. (2006). The leader's guide to lateral thinking skills-unlocking the creativity and innovation in you and your team, 2nd edn (p. 191). London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Whitaker, R. (2007). Validation examples of the analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 840–859.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shelke, M., Abeysekera, V. (2021). A Methodology for Establishing the Relevance of the RGR Model to Construction. In: Ahmed, S.M., Hampton, P., Azhar, S., D. Saul, A. (eds) Collaboration and Integration in Construction, Engineering, Management and Technology. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48465-1_108
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48464-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48465-1