Abstract
The introduction recognizes the interactivity and fluidity of natural sciences in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, which helps scholars of science and literature to highlight the often speculative nature of literatures that engage with scientific knowledge. Against the grain of claims about the radical separation of scientific and humanistic forms of scholarship and writing, the introduction argues that different modes of writing co-produce scientific discourses, requiring scholars of literature and science to critically analyze the worldviews, historical contexts, geopolitics, and social inequalities that form and influence scientific representation. In turn, literary texts dealing with phenomena ranging from environmental problems to futuristic technologies reflect how social inequalities based on race, nation, gender, class, and other categories of difference shape and emerge within public visions of science. Given this crucial fluidity of scientific knowledge, the introduction also recognizes how the fields of science and technology studies and literature and science are today increasingly shaped by complex institutional agendas at universities, which both link these fields to capitalist transformations of education and open new pathways for developing socially just forms of critique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, Matthew. 1882. Literature and Science. Nineteenth Century XII (August): 216–230.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Farooq, Nihad. 2016. Undisciplined: Science, Ethnography, and Personhood in the Americas, 1830–1940. New York: New York University Press.
Goldstein, Amanda Jo. 2017. Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
Hayles, Katherine. 1990. Chaos Bound: Orderly Disorder in Contemporary Literature and Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Herndl, Diane Price. 2005. Disease versus Disability: The Medical Humanities and Disability Studies. PMLA 120 (2): 593–598.
Huxley, T. H. (1880) 1893. Science and Culture. In Science and Education: Essays, 140. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Klugman, Craig, and Erin Gentry Lamb. 2019. Introduction: Raising the Health Humanities. In Research Methods in Health Humanities, ed. Craig Klugman and Erin Gentry Lamb, 1–11. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.
Rusert, Britt. 2017. Fugitive Science: Freedom and Empiricism in Early African American Culture. New York: NY University Press.
Snow, C.P. (1959) 2012. The Two Cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wellmann, Janina. 2017. The Form of Becoming: Embryology and the Epistemology of Rhythm, 1760–1830. New York: Zone Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collective, T.T. (2020). Introduction. In: Ahuja, N., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Literature and Science. Palgrave Handbooks of Literature and Science. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48244-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48244-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48243-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48244-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)