Abstract
We discuss key terms, analytical details, and concepts that clarify the analysis of catastrophic incidents. Those concepts include scenario, paradigm, and plausibility. We discuss and exemplify how the effect of catastrophic incidents can practically be assessed through the discrete couplings of magnitude of the consequences and their frequency of occurrence using risk matrices (or tables). Although these matrices do not raise to the level of cause and effect inherent to the legal arguments demanded by constitutional or statutory law, they are often used as managerial tools. Their predictions associate frequencies to consequences through practical experiences and can be useful when a decision may have to be taken without having sufficient time for protracted scientific study. Although theoretically weak, they are plausible for time-of-the essence assessments and to inform decisions under an imminent threat. We also discuss phrases that describe uncertainty as intervals between probability numbers; for example, very likely to occur is stated as a probability interval between 0 and 0.1 (i.e., 0 and 10%).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Below, R., Wirtz, A., Guha-Sapir, D. (2009). Disaster Category Classification and Peril Terminology for Operational Purposes Common accord. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and Munich Reinsurance Company (Munich RE). Working Paper 264, 20p. Universite’ Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
L.A.J. Cox, (2008) What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 28, 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x
CSHIB, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, Final Investigative Report (Mar. 2007)
DOD, Dept. of Defense, Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for System engineering, Washington, D.C., (2017)
EM-DAT. The international Disaster databased. Centre for research on the Epidemiology of Disasters – CRED. http://www.emdat.be/glossary/9 accessed June, 8, 2019
Continuity and Transformation in Environmental Regulation Farber, Daniel A. 10 Ariz. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2019)
E.C. Fisher, P. Pascual, W.E. Wagner, Understanding environmental models in their legal and regulatory context. J. Environ. Law 22(2), 251–283 (2010)
S.I. Gass, M.C. Fu, Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (Springer, New York, 2013)
G. Gigerenzer and W. Gaissmaier, Heuristic Decision Making, Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Guha-Sapir, D., Below, R. Hoyois, Ph., EM-DAT: International Disaster Database – www.emdat.be – Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, (2009)
K. Hewitt, L. Sheehan, A Pilot Survey of Global Natural Disasters the Past Twenty Years. Natural Hazards Research Working Paper, No. 11 (University of Toronto, Toronto, 1969)
E. Ippoliti, C. Cellucci, Logica, 2nd edn. (Egea, Milano, 2018). (in Italian)
J. Jaccard, J. Jacoby, Theory Construction and Model Building (Guilford Press, New York, 2010)
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (1984) Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962)
I. Lakatos, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1978)
L. Magnani, W. Carnielli, C. Pizzi (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, Abduction, Logic, and Computational Discovery (Springer, Heidelberg, 2010)
I. McLeod, http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/AnscombeQuartet (2011)
MITRE Corp, System Engineering Guide (Washington, D.C., 2014)
Munich RE Foundation 2006, From Knowldge to Action, http://www.munichre-foundation.org/content/dam/munichre/foundation/publications/2007_1_en_Annual%20report%202006.pdf/_jcr_content/renditions/original./2007_1_en_Annual%20report%202006.pdf
NAS, Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., (2016a)
NAS, How Modeling Can Inform Strategies to Improve Population Health (workshop Summary, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C. (2016b)
NAS, Characterizing Risk in Climate Change Assessments: Proceedings of a workshop, National Academic Press (2016c)
Office of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Disaster Risk Assessment and Risk Financing, A G20/OECD Methodological framework, Paris (2015)
R. W. Perry, E. L. Quarantelli, What Is a Disaster?, 442 pp, (2005) (Rutledge, London Xlibris, 1998)
H. Rodriguez, E. L. Quarantelli, R. R. Dynes, Handbook of Disaster Research (Springer, 2007), 611 pp
Disaster Crisis Management: A Summary Of Research Findings, E. L. Quarantelli First published:July (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00043.x
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Climate Change in the United States: Benefits of Global Action. EPA 430-R-15-001. Washington, DC. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/cirareport.pdf
UNDP, Human Development Report 2011, Sustainability and Equity, Paris France, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hdr/human_developmentreport2011.html (2015)
United Nations Development Program, (UNDP) Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, Disaster-conflict Interface, Comparative Experiences, NY (2015)
US Army Technical Report TR-2014-19, Army Independent Risk Assessment Guidebook, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, Washington, DC (April, 2014)
US EPA, Guidance for PM2.5 Permit Modeling, EPA-454/B-14-001, May 2014. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/Guidance_for_PM25_Permit_Modeling.pdf
WHO (World Health Organization). Definitions: emergencies. http://www.who.int/hac/about/definitions/en/
WHO/EHA, Disasters and Emergencies, Definitions, Training Package, Addis Ababa, (Updated March 2002). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ricci, P.F. (2020). Catastrophes, Disasters, and Calamities: Concepts for Their Assessment. In: Analysis of Catastrophes and Their Public Health Consequences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48066-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48066-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48065-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48066-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)