Skip to main content

Institutional Arrangements and Student Engagement Supporting Post-practicum Interventions

Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL,volume 28)

Abstract

The wide-scale introduction of work integrated education and specific approaches, such as post-practicum activities, impact significantly on many embedded and ritualised institutional arrangements. Some activities relate to curriculum structures and commonly accepted practices, and others to partnerships with workplaces. Educational provision in universities has traditionally been associated with achieving the institutional educational aspirations and goals. In recent times this has been increasingly questioned, suggesting greater emphasis on meeting the current and future needs of students and the expectations of graduate employers. Despite public statements about student-focused education and the emergence of scholarship on individualised learning, the focus and everyday expectations within universities themselves remain primarily focused upon practices that serve the purposes, processes and reputation of the educational institutions. While graduate employment statistics are an important concern of universities, along with the inclusion and central role of work-based and practice-located experiences within higher education that are intended to contribute to and enhance graduate employability, their implementation has proved to challenge the canons underpinning traditional university educational practices. These disruptions are due, in no small part, to the reliance on commonly accepted rituals and norms that shape educational policy and curriculum practices.

The purpose of this chapter is to consider the kind of institutional arrangements that can present barriers to, or offer best support for, the provision of experiences in these two different kinds of physical and social settings (i.e., workplaces and educational institutions) in the interests of achieving worthwhile educational outcomes. The implications for higher education provisions are central to the exploration of such enabling and prohibitive factors. They extend to what constitutes curriculum, and how experiences for students should be conceptualised, organised, and ordered. Such discussion also opens up deliberations on what constitutes the purposes of higher education and how these can best be realised through institutional considerations that include what provisions are organised through education and other settings, such as workplaces. These issues are discussed and elaborated in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   117.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   158.24
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   158.24
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout this chapter, we will use terms such as Work Integrated Education (WIE), Work Integrated Learning (WIL) and Practicum. We will primarily use ‘WIE’ as this refers to the design and delivery of an educational program. The term ‘WIL’ is used when referring to student learning within the program. ‘Practicum’ is a term used to denote a program of learning that occurs in the practice setting in contrast to theoretical, propositional learning in classrooms and online learning platforms. WIL has come to be used as a common term to denote all of these things, however, we believe that these distinctions are important.

References

  • Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antwertinger, Y., Larkin, I., Lau, E., O’Connor, E., & Santos, M. (2019). Transition to a successful career: Pharmacy, psychology and business students reflecting on practicum feedback. In S. Billett, J. Orrell, D. Jackson, & F. Valencia-Forrester (Eds.), Enriching higher education students’ learning through post-work placement interventions (p. XX-XX). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. (2018). Graduate employability and higher education: Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, 31–61. Retrieved from https://www.herdsa.org.au/herdsa-review-higher-education-vol-5/31-61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, A. A., Rowe, A. D., & Clark, L. (2017). Academic workload implications of assessing student learning in work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(2), 167–183. Retrieved from https://www.ijwil.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (Ed.). (2010). Learning through practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2011). Curriculum and pedagogical bases for effectively integrating practice-based experiences. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Cain, M., & Le, A. H. (2018). Augmenting higher education students’ work experiences: Preferred purposes and processes. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1250073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Newton, J. M., Rogers, G., & Noble, C. (Eds.). (2019). Augmenting health and social care students’ clinical learning experiences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgstock, R. (2016). Graduate Employability 2.0: Enhancing the connectedness of learners, teachers and higher education institutions (Final report of the national senior teaching fellowship). Canberra, ACT: Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2006). Carnegie community engagement classification. Retrieved from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/

  • Choy, S., & Delahaye, B. (2011). Partnerships between universities and workplaces: Some challenges for work-integrated learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.546079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2019). Thoughts on social justice and universities. In K. Freebody, S. Goodwin, & H. Proctor (Eds.), Higher education, pedagogy and social justice: Politics and practice (pp. 23–36). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26484-0_2

  • Cooper, L., & Orrell, J. (1999, August). The practicum: The domestic work of university teaching. HERDSA News, 21(2), 6–9. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/sites/default/files/HERDSANews19992102.pdf

  • Cooper, L., & Orrell, J. (2016). University and community engagement: Towards a partnership based on deliberate reciprocity. In Educating the deliberate professional (pp. 107–123). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, S., & Giles, D., Jr. (2004). Service-learning partnerships: Paths of engagement. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(1), 25–37. Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.0011.103/1

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, J. M., & Cimbora, D. M. (2016). Solving the internship imbalance: Opportunities and obstacles. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 10(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferns, S., Russell, L., Kay, J., & Smith, J. (2018). Emerging models of work integrated learning: Enablers and challenges. Paper presented at ACEN 2018, Brisbane. Retrieved from http://acen.edu.au/2018conference/accepted-papers/

  • Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2016). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(1), 223–244. Retrieved from https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1270/1267

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, B., Brimble, M., & Cameron, C. (2011). WIL and generic skill development: The development of business students’ generic skills through work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 12(2), 79–93. Retrieved from https://www.ijwil.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribble, N., & Netto, J. (2019). The preferred method of reflection for occupational therapy students: Video, written or artistic? In S. Billett, J. Orrell, D. Jackson, & F. Valencia-Forrester (Eds.), Enriching higher education students’ learning through post-work placement interventions (p. XX-XX). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddara, M., & Skanes, H. (2007). Cooperative education, from experience to experiential learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 8(1), 67–76. Retrieved from https://www.ijwil.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., Walkington, H., & France, D. (2016). Graduate attributes: Implications for higher education practice and policy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1154932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. (2016). The role of government, industry and education and research institutions in developing innovation capabilities: Issues arising from key informant interviews and matters for policy consideration. p. 18. Accessed at https://www.howardpartners.com.au/assets/acola-saf-10-4-howard-partners-interviews-report.pdf

  • Jackson, D. (2013). Contribution of WIL to undergraduate employability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(2), 99–115. Retrieved from https://www.ijwil.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (2016). Re-conceptualising graduate employability: The construction of pre-professional identity in the higher education landscape of practice. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(5), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., Rowbottom, D., Ferns, S., & McLaren, D. (2016). Employer understanding of Work-Integrated Learning and the challenges of engaging in WIL opportunities. Studies in Continuing Education, 39(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2016.1228624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Trede, F. (2019). The role of reflection after placement experiences to develop self-authorship among higher education students. In S. Billett, J. Orrell, D. Jackson, & F. Valencia-Forrester (Eds.), Enriching higher education students’ learning through post-work placement interventions (p. XX-XX). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., Fleming, J., & Rowe, A. (2019). Enabling the transfer of skills and knowledge across classroom and work contexts. Vocations and Learning, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H., & Warnock, L. (2015). When a PhD is not enough: A case study of a UK internship programme to enhance the employability of doctoral researchers. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 5(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-05-2014-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrigan, M., Manktelow, A., & Simmons, E. (2018). Sandwich placements: Negating the socio-economic effect on graduate prospects. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 20(4), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.20.4.81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orrell, J. (2011). Good practice report: Work-integrated learning. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrell, J., & Higgs, J. (2012). Social and political change: Implications for professional and practice-based university education. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 41–54). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/9789462091283_005

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C. J., Valencia-Forrester, F., Backhaus, B., McGregor, R., Cain, G., & Lloyd, K. (2019). The state of service-learning in Australia. Reflective essay. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(3), 185–198. Retrieved from https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/1528/1465

    Google Scholar 

  • PhillipsKPA. (2014). Engaging employers in work integrated learning: Current state and future priorities. Richmond, VIC: PhillipsKPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, G., & Papakonstantinou, T. (2015). Student perceptions of their workplace preparedness: Making work-integrated learning more effective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 16(1), 13–24. Retrieved from https://www.ijwil.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2016). Reflection: A renewed and practical focus for an existing problem in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n7.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Rowe, A., & Wilson, M. (2017). Good practice report – Work integrated learning (WIL). Sydney, NSW: NSW Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C., & Merkator, N. (2013). The new higher education professionals. In B. M. Kehm & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 53–92). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2012). Evaluating the quality of work-integrated learning curricula: A comprehensive framework. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.558072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/36783

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (Eds.). (2016). Educating the deliberate professional. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Australia. (2019). Work integrated learning in universities: Final report. Canberra, ACT: Universities Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Australia, Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Australian Industry Group. (2015). National strategy on work integrated learning in university education. In Business Council of Australia, & Australian collaborative education network. Canberra, ACT: Universities Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2010a). Convergence and divergence in professional identities. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 167–184). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2010b). Some implications of ‘Public/Private Space’ for professional identities in higher education. Higher Education, 60(6), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9320-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C., Skinner, M., & Lauwerys, J. (2009). Recent developments in relation to professional staff in UK higher education. Australian Universities Review, 51(1), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2016). Higher education: Public good or private commodity? London Review of Education, 14(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.14.1.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Jackson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jackson, D., Orrell, J. (2020). Institutional Arrangements and Student Engagement Supporting Post-practicum Interventions. In: Billett, S., Orrell, J., Jackson, D., Valencia-Forrester, F. (eds) Enriching Higher Education Students' Learning through Post-work Placement Interventions. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48062-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48062-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48062-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics