Skip to main content

Causes of Failures After Antireflux Surgery and Indication, Technique and Results of Laparoscopic Redo-Antireflux Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • 468 Accesses

Abstract

After the “boom” of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the past 25 years, the necessity of revisional surgery (redo-surgery) has also increased. It can be anticipated from large series that the average overall necessity of redo-antireflux surgery is around 5% (5–60%) The failure after antireflux surgery can be defined as persisting, recurrent, or new onset of troublesome symptoms after the primary procedure or by results of objective testing. Reasons for failures are partial or complete loss of the antireflux barrier, a new-onset dysphagia combined with or without reflux problems due to an incorrectly placed wrap, a slipped wrap, or dysphagia due to a peptic stenosis caused by reflux recurrence or a compression of the distal esophagus by paraesophageal herniation, as well as epigastric pain, cramps, and/or nausea and vomiting by gastroparesis. Insufficient, preoperative diagnostic workup and neglecting important pathophysiologic factors that should have influenced the decision for surgery could also be a major cause of failure. A superficial approach necessary for diagnostic evaluations of the patient and a superficial process of therapeutic decision-making will lead to inappropriate selection of patients. Most frequent problems are migration of the wrap and mediastinal dislocation, a partial or complete breakdown of the wrap, a short esophagus, a slippage of the wrap, and other anatomical changes. The failure rate after redo-antireflux surgery lies between 15% and 25%. This underlines the importance to have at least the redo-surgery done in a dedicated esophageal center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Luostarinen ME, Isolauri JO, Koskinen MO, Laitinen JO, Matikainen MJ, Lindholm TS. Refundoplication for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux. World J Surg. 1993;17:587–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuchs KH, Heimbucher J, Freys SM, Thiede A. Management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease 1995. Tailored concept of anti-reflux operations. Dis Esoph. 1995;7:250–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonavina L, Chella B, Segalin A, Incarbone R, Peracchia A. Surgical therapy in patients with failed antireflux repairs. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1998;45:1344–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunter JG, Smith CD, Branum GD, Waring JP, Trus TL, Cornwell M, Galloway K. Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg. 1999;230:595–604.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Crookes P, Stefan O, de Vos Shoop M, Hagen JA, Bremner CG. The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg. 1998;228:40–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pointner R, Bammer T, Then P, Kamolz T. Laparoscopic refundoplications after failed antireflux surgery. Am J Surg. 1999;178(6):541–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dallemagne B, Arenas Sanchez M, Francart D, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C. Long-term results after laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux procedures. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1581–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG. Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery; a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1539–49.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou T, Harnsberger C, Broderick R, Fuchs HF, Talamini M, Jacobsen G, Horgan S, Chang D, Sandler B. Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:510–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Williford WO. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA. 2001;285:2331–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dallemagne B, Weertz J, Markiewicz S, Dewandre JM, Wahlen C, Monami B, Jehaes C. Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication ten years after surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:159–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fein M, Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Pachmayer V, Heimbucher J, Freys SM, Fuchs KH. Ten year outcome of laparoscopic antireflux procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1893–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB. Evidenced based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg. 2009;239:325–37.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neufeld M, Graham A. Levels of evidence available for techniques in antireflux surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:161–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis CS, Baldea A, Johns JR, Joehl RJ, Fisichella PM. The evolution and long-term results of laparoscopic Antireflux SUrgery fort he treatment of Gastroesophageal reflux disease. JSLS. 2010;14:332–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fein M, Seyfried F. Is there a role for anything other than a Nissen’s operation? J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(suppl):S 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Broeders JAJL, Mauritz FA, Ahmed Ali U, Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Gooszen HG, Smout AJPM, Broeders IAMJ, Hazebroek EJ. Systematic review and metaanalysis of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1318–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan G, Yang Z, Wang Z. Metaanalysis of laparoscopic total Nissen versus posterior Toupet fundoplication for GERD based on randomized clinical trials. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81:246–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Skinner DB. Surgical management after failed and reflux-operations. W J Surg. 1983;6:359–65.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siewert JR, Isolauri J, Feussner H. Reoperation following failed fundoplication. W J Surg. 1989;13:791–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG. When fundoplication fails – redo? Ann Surg. 2005;241:861–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, Zeni TM, Zografakis JG, Moore RM, Meiselman M, Luu M, Ayiomamitis GD. Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;19:135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Awais O, Luketich JD, Matthew J, Schuchert MJ, Morse CR, Wilson J, Gooding WE, Landreneau RJ, Pennathur A. Reoperative Antireflux Surgery for failed fundoplication: an analysis of outcomes in 275 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1083–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fuchs KH. Revisionseingriffe nach Antirefluxchirurgie. In: Fuchs KH, editor. Management der Gastroösophagealen Refluxkrankeit, vol. 183: De Gruyter Verlag Berlin; 2018. –208.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Allison PR. Peptic ulcer of the oesophagus. Thorax. 1948;3(1):20–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Collis JL. An operation for hiatus hernia with short esophagus. J Thorac Surg. 1957;34:768–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gozetti G, Pilotti V, Spanaro M, Basso F, Grigioni W, Carulli N, Loria P, Felice V, Lerro F, Mattioli S. Pathophysiology and natural history of acquired short esophagus. Surgery. 1987;102:507–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yousef YK, Shekar N, Lutfi R, Richards WO, Torquati A. Long-term evaluation of patient satisfaction and reflux symptoms after laparoscopic fundoplicatio with Collis gastroplasty. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1702–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mattioli S, Lugaresi ML, Costantini M, Del Genio A, Di Martino N, Fei L, Fumagalli U, Maffettone V, Monaco L, Morino M, Rebecchi F, Rosati R, Rossi M, Sant S, Trapani V, Zaninotto G. The short esophagus: intraoperative assessment of esophageal length. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1610.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Abertucci M. Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1986;204:19.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W, Fein M, Maroske J. Hammer I; laparoscopic Nissen repair: indications, techniques and long term benefits. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2005;390:197–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD, SAGES Guideline committee. SAGES guidelines for surgical treatment of GERD. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2647–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuchs KH, Babic B, Breithaupt W, Dallemagne B, Fingerhut A, Furnee E, Granderath F, Horvath OP, Kardos P, Pointner R, Savarino E, Van Herwarden-Lindeboom M, Zaninotto G. EAES recommendations for the management of Gastroesophageal reflux Disease. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1753–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Merendino KA, Dillard DH. The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic and physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction; with special reference to reflux, esophagitis, cardiospasm and esophageal varices. Ann Surg. 1955;142:486–506.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, Harris AS, Belli EV, Pfluke JM, Preissler S, Asbun HJ, Smith CD. Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3095–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Van Rijn S, Roebroek YGM, Conchillo JM, Bouvy ND, Masclee AAM. Effect of Vagus Nerve Injury on the outcome of antireflux surgery: an extensive literature review. Dig Surg. 2016;33:230–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhayani NH, Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Kurian AA, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL. End of the road for dysfunctional end organ: laparoscopic gastrectomy for refractory gastroparesis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:411–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM, Khan S. Suture Cruroplasty versus prosthetic hiatal herniorraphy for large hiatal hernia: a metaanalysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2016;263:258–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Koetje JH, Oor JE, Roks DJ, Van Westreenen HL, Hazebroek EJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB. Equal patient satisfaction, quality of Life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3673–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, Watson DI, Gao X, Koetje JH, Luo T, Yan C, Du X, Wang Z. Systematic review and metaanalysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):4913–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5586-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Koetje JH, Broeders JA, van Westreenen HL, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Hazebroek EJ. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(11):4579–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6211-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zehetner J, Ravari F, Ayazi S, Skibba A, Iarehzereshki A, Pelipad D, Mason RJ, Katkhouda N, Lipham JC. Minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of gastroparesis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:61–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wykypiel H, Kamolz T, Steiner P, Klingler A, Granderath FA, Pointner R, Wetscher GJ. Austrian experiences with redo antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1315–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Funch-Jensen P, Bendixen A, Iversen MG, Kehlet H. Complications and frequency of redo-antireflux surgery in Denmark: a nationwide study, 1997–2005. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:627–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Singhal S, Kirkpatrick DR, Masuda T, Gerhardt J, Mittal SK. Primary and redo antireflux surgery: outcomes and lessons learned. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:177–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, KH. (2020). Causes of Failures After Antireflux Surgery and Indication, Technique and Results of Laparoscopic Redo-Antireflux Procedures. In: Horgan, S., Fuchs, KH. (eds) Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48009-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48009-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48008-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48009-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics