Skip to main content

Introduction: Finding a New Approach to Ancient Proxy Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complexity Economics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Ancient Economies ((PASTAE))

Abstract

This book is about a big problem in economic history research: how to study economic development in societies that lack archival records or written sources suitable for cliometric analyses? In the past decades economic archaeology has made huge advances in its abilities to identify, collect, process, and interpret material remains as proxy-data for economic interactions and performance. Ancient economic historians eagerly incorporated these proxy-data in their arguments but found them impossible to translate into familiar economic indicators. Archaeologists in turn struggled to analyse their datasets in the neoclassical and new-institutional framework favoured by economic historians. Making progress in ancient economic history research requires bridging the gap between both disciplines. This book discusses complexity economics as a new framework to integrate proxy-data from the archaeological record into both economic history and archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Verboven, “The Knights Who Say NIE”.

  2. 2.

    See for instance Harper, The Fate of Rome.

  3. 3.

    See for instance Verboven and Erdkamp, Structure and Performance in the Roman Economy; Manning and Morris, The Ancient Economy; Scheidel and Von Reden, The Ancient Economy; Remesal Rodríguez, Revilla Calvo, and Bermúdez Lorenzo, Cuantificar las economías antiguas; for an earlier example see Finley, Ancient History.

  4. 4.

    Scheidel, “In Search of Roman Economic Growth”, 50.

  5. 5.

    Verboven, “Ancient Cliometrics”.

  6. 6.

    Hopkins, Conquerors and Slaves, 19–20; Hopkins, “Taxes and Trade”, 43; see the discussion in Verboven, “Ancient Cliometrics”, 347–50.

  7. 7.

    Hopkins, “Models, Ships and Staples”, 85; see also Hopkins, “Taxes and Trade”; Hopkins, “Rome, Taxes, Rents and Trade”; Hopkins, “Rents, Taxes, Trade and the City of Rome”.

  8. 8.

    Wilson, “Approaches to Quantifying Roman Trade”.

  9. 9.

    Cf. Arthur, Complexity and the Economy, 3: “[E]conomics early in its history took a simpler approach, one more amenable to mathematical analysis. It asked not how agents’ behaviors would react to the aggregate patterns these created, but what behaviors (actions, strategies, expectations) would be upheld by—would be consistent with—the aggregate patterns these caused. It asked in other words what patterns would call for no changes in micro-behavior, and would therefore be in stasis, or equilibrium” (emphasis by the author).

  10. 10.

    On the advantages of equilibrium economics and its limits see Arthur, 3–4.

  11. 11.

    North, “Some Fundamental Puzzles in Economic History/Development”, 237.

  12. 12.

    The terminology is revealing. It suggests that equilibrium is really “out there”. It is merely hard to find because life keeps getting in the way.

  13. 13.

    Freeman and Carchedi, Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics, viii.

  14. 14.

    Beinhocker, The Origin of Wealth.

  15. 15.

    For a more elaborate discussion see the chapters by Verboven.

  16. 16.

    The chapter is useful also to links this book to a previous book in the same research programme: Verboven and Erdkamp, Structure and Performance in the Roman Economy.

  17. 17.

    Temin, The Roman Market Economy; Bang, The Roman Bazaar.

  18. 18.

    Verboven, “Ancient Cliometrics”.

  19. 19.

    By Verboven, Preiser-Kapeller, Brughmans, Van Limbergen and Vermeulen, Willet and Elliot.

Bibliography

  • Arthur, W. Brian. Complexity and the Economy, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bang, Peter Fibiger. The Roman Bazaar: A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, Eric D. The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley, M. I. Ancient History: Evidence and Models. New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Viking, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Alan, and Guglielmo Carchedi. Marx and Non-Equilibrium Economics. Cheltenham, UK; Brookfield, US: Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Kyle. The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Keith. Conquerors and Slaves. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Keith. ‘Models, Ships and Staples’. In Trade and Famine in Classical Antiquity, edited by Peter Garnsey and Charles Richard Whittacker, 84–109. Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Volume No. 8. Cambridge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Keith. ‘Rents, Taxes, Trade and the City of Rome’. In Mercati permanenti e mercati periodici nel mondo romano. Atti degli Incontri capresi di storia dell’economia antica: (Capri 13–15 ottobre 1997), edited by Elio Lo Cascio, 253–67. Bari: Edipuglia, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Keith. ‘Rome, Taxes, Rents and Trade’. Kodai 6 (1995/1996): 41–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, Keith. ‘Taxes and Trade in the Roman Empire (200 B.C.–A.D. 400)’. Journal of Roman Studies 70 (1980): 101–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Joseph Gilbert, and Ian Morris, eds. The Ancient Economy: Evidence and Models. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. ‘Some Fundamental Puzzles in Economic History/Development’. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, edited by W. Brian Arthur, Steven N Durlauf, and David A Lane, 223–37. Reading: Addison-Wesley, Advanced Book Program, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remesal Rodríguez, José, Victor Revilla Calvo, and Juan Manuel Bermúdez Lorenzo, eds. Cuantificar las economías antiguas: problemas y métodos = Quantifying Ancient Economies: Problems and Methodologies. Collecció Instrumenta 60. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Edicions, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter. ‘In Search of Roman Economic Growth’. Journal of Roman Archaeology 22, no. 1 (2009): 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel, Walter, and Sitta Von Reden, eds. The Ancient Economy. New York: Routledge, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temin, Peter. The Roman Market Economy. The Princeton Economic History of the Western World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboven, Koenraad. ‘The Knights Who Say NIE. Can Neo-Institutional Economics Live up to Its Expectation in Ancient History Research?’ In Structure and Performance in the Roman Economy. Models, Methods and Case Studies, edited by Koenraad Verboven and Paul Erdkamp, 33–57. Brussels: Latomus, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboven, Koenraad. ‘Ancient Cliometrics and Archaeological Proxy-Data. Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea’. In Cuantificar las economías antiguas. Problemas y métodos. Quantifying Ancient Economies. Problems and Methodologies, edited by José Remesal Rodríguez, Víctor Revilla Calvo, and Manuel Bermúdez Lorenzo, 345–71. Collecció Instrumenta 60. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Edicions, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboven, Koenraad, and Paul Erdkamp, eds. Structure and Performance in the Roman Economy. Models, Methods and Case Studies. Collection Latomus 350. Brussels: Latomus, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Andrew. ‘Approaches to Quantifying Roman Trade’. In Quantifying the Roman Economy: Methods and Problems, 213–49. Oxford Roman Economy Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Last but no least it is my pleasure here to thank our supporters, collaborators, and funding bodies without whom this book would never have been possible. The work is part of the 2017–2021 research programme of the international network “Structural Determinants of Economic Performance in the Roman World”, generously funded by the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO). Six of the contributionsFootnote 19 originate from discussions at an international workshop held in Sagalassos, Turkey, in 2015 funded by this network and by the Sagalassos Archaeological Research Project. Special thanks are due to Jeroen Poblome, director of the Sagalassos Project for making this possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koenraad Verboven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Verboven, K. (2021). Introduction: Finding a New Approach to Ancient Proxy Data. In: Verboven, K. (eds) Complexity Economics. Palgrave Studies in Ancient Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47898-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47898-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47898-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics