Skip to main content
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concludes the volume with a brief discussion of two interrelated topics. First, it was argued in the second chapter that medieval theologians shared a common understanding of the divine relations. Here that common theology is placed into contrast with Wolfhart Pannenberg’s theology of the divine relations to highlight an alternative account that was not supported by any medieval theologians. Second, the chapter examines the ways in which post-Lombardian medieval trinitarian theology was circumscribed by certain theological, philosophical, and educational developments that occurred in the early thirteenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rowan Williams, On Christian Theology, 131, emphasis his.

  2. 2.

    Fred Lawrence related this account of Lonergan’s lectures in private correspondence.

  3. 3.

    Ibid. 132.

  4. 4.

    Here, for example, one can think about the way in which the Lombard placed his discussion of the imago Dei (I.3) immediately before his discussion of the emanation of the Son (I.4–7), and the way in which this location of the two topics influenced how subsequent thinkers employed the imago in discussions of the divine emanations via the noetic analogies of Augustine.

  5. 5.

    Wolfhart Pannenberg, Systematic Theology I, 273.

  6. 6.

    Ibid. 309–311.

  7. 7.

    Wolfhart Pannenberg, Systematic Theology I, 294–312.

  8. 8.

    Lewis Ayres, Nicaea and Its Legacy, 385n4.

  9. 9.

    Wolfhart Pannenberg, Systematic Theology I, 280–299.

  10. 10.

    Abelard, Historia Calamitatum 10.

  11. 11.

    See John T. Slotemaker, “Peter Lombard and the Imago Trinitatis,” 175–180.

  12. 12.

    Jacques-Guy Bougerol, “The Church Fathers,” 115.

  13. 13.

    Russell L. Friedman, Intellectual Traditions, 345.

  14. 14.

    Ibid. 346.

  15. 15.

    Marilyn McCord Adams, “The Metaphysics of the Trinity,” 101.

  16. 16.

    See John T. Slotemaker, “William of Ockham,” 121–142.

  17. 17.

    John T. Slotemaker and Jeffrey C. Witt, Robert Holcot, 76–81.

  18. 18.

    Michael H. Shank, Unless you Believe.

  19. 19.

    Servetus, De Trinitatis erroribus I (II-2, 679).

Bibliography

Pre-Modern Sources

  • Peter Abelard. Historia calamitatum, ed. J. Monfrin. Paris 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servetus, Michael. De trinitatis erroribus libri septem, in Obras Completas II-2, ed. Ángel Alcalá. Zaragoza 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Modern Sources

  • Adams, Marilyn McCord. “The Metaphysics of the Trinity in Some Fourteenth Century Franciscans,” Franciscan Studies 66 (2008), 101–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and its Legacy: An approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougerol, Jacques-Guy. “The Church Fathers and the Sentences of Peter Lombard,” in The Reception of the Church Fathers in the West, ed. Irena Backus. Leiden 2001, 113–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Russell L. Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350. Leiden 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Grundzuge der Christologie. Gütersloh 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Systematic Theology, volume I, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, Michael H. Unless you Believe, You shall Not Understand: Logic, University, and Society in Late Medieval Vienna. Princeton 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotemaker, John T. “Peter Lombard and the Imago Trinitatis,” in A Companion to Medieval Christian Humanism, ed., John P. Bequette. Leiden 2016, 168–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “William of Ockham and Theological Method,” in Language and Method: Historical and Historiographical Reflections on Medieval Thought, ed. Ueli Zahnd. Freiburg 2017, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slotemaker, John T., and Jeffrey C. Witt. Robert Holcot. Oxford 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Rowan. On Christian Theology. Oxford 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Slotemaker, J.T. (2020). Conclusion. In: Trinitarian Theology in Medieval and Reformation Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47790-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics