Abstract
Humans, like other animals, have sensory structures allowing them to transduce diverse physical stimuli into signals that the nervous system can process. Sensory pathways, characteristic for each type of “sense,” process unisensory stimuli at various stages before they feed into multimodal and “higher” structures implementing eventually processes such as spatial orientation, object recognition, maintenance of homeostasis, or specific motivation. Those pathways, typically involving subcortical and cortical parts, establish a hierarchical structure. Hierarchical processing involves not only feed forward but also parallel and feedback processing so that progressively more complex properties of the signals are represented. Complex representations of the environmental and bodily signals are only partly accessible to our subjective experience. In this chapter, we introduce the processing pathways and hierarchies of the main sensory systems. Further, we put special emphasis on how sensory representations are integrated into coherent multisensory representations of our environment. Multisensory perception not only offers specific advantages over unisensory perception but also entails specific difficulties leading to multisensory illusions. We describe psychophysical and neural principles of how the nervous system generates our multisensory perception. Finally, we give an outlook on possible roles that multisensory perceptions may play in mental disorders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pheromones are chemical messengers carrying signals from one living system to the other as first described and investigated by Butenandt for airborne messengers enabling communication in some butterflies.
- 2.
Humor is also a dimension of humanity, but science (even humanities) has never taken it very seriously….
- 3.
Prostaglandins are signaling lipids with para- or autocrine functions.
- 4.
In 7 Chap. 2, the cellular ionic gradient of K+ was discussed and its relatively high intracellular concentration. Any destruction (necrosis) of cells will lead to elevated K+ concentrations in the extracellular fluid.
- 5.
Rigorously there are three types: the heart is counted as a special kind of muscle, too.
- 6.
Some of the axons of the motor cortex “relay” first at the diencephalic red nucleus before connecting to the spinal cord.
References
Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14(3):257–262
Beauchamp MS, Argall BD, Bodurka J, Duyn JH, Martin A (2004) Unraveling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 7(11):1190–1192. nn1333 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1333
Bizley JK, Nodal FR, Bajo VM, Nelken I, King AJ (2007) Physiological and anatomical evidence for multisensory interactions in auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 17(9):2172–2189. bhl128 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl128
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669):756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784
Bremmer F, Schlack A, Shah NJ, Zafiris O, Kubischik M, Hoffmann K, Zilles K, Fink GR (2001) Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 29(1):287–296. S0896-6273(01)00198-2 [pii]
Bruce C, Desimone R, Gross CG (1981) Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 46(2):369–384
Contreras M, Ceric F, Torrealba F (2007) Inactivation of the interoceptive insula disrupts drug craving and malaise induced by lithium. Science 318(5850):655–658. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145590
Dahl CD, Logothetis NK, Kayser C (2009) Spatial organization of multisensory responses in temporal association cortex. J Neurosci 29(38):11924–11932. 29/38/11924 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3437-09.2009
de Gelder B, Vroomen J, Annen L, Masthof E, Hodiamont P (2003) Audio-visual integration in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 59(2–3):211–218. [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(01)00344-9
Dehaene S, Naccache L (2001) Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 79(1–2):1–37
Diederich A, Colonius H (2004) Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time. Percept Psychophys 66(8):1388–1404
Driver J, Noesselt T (2008) Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on ‘sensory-specific’ brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron 57(1):11–23. S0896-6273(07)01019-7 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.013
Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME (1998) Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J Neurophysiol 79(1):126–136
Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415(6870):429–433
Ernst MO, Bulthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8(4):162–169. S1364661304000385 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002
Fetsch CR, Deangelis GC, Angelaki DE (2013) Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci 14(6):429–442. nrn3503 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3503
Fetsch CR, Pouget A, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2012) Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration. Nat Neurosci 15(1):146–154. nn.2983 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2983
Foss-Feig JH, Kwakye LD, Cascio CJ, Burnette CP, Kadivar H, Stone WL, Wallace MT (2010) An extended multisensory temporal binding window in autism spectrum disorders. Exp Brain Res 203(2):381–389
Gepshtein S, Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS (2005) The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. J Vis 5(11):1013–1023. 5/11/7 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1167/5.11.7
Ghazanfar AA, Schroeder CE (2006) Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends Cogn Sci 10(6):278–285. S1364-6613(06)00104-5 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008
Haans et al (2012) Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: Predicting self-reports of people’s personal experiences. Acta Psychol 141:169–177
Hickok G, & Poeppel D (2000) Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4(4):131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01463-7
Hickok G, & Poeppel D (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92(1–2):67–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011
Hickok G, & Poeppel D (2007) The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(5):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
Hickok G (2012) The cortical organization of speech processing: feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual-stream model. J Commun Disord 45(6):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.004
Jackson C (1953) Visual factors in auditory localization. Q J Exp Psychol 5(2):52–65
Johnson J, Clydesdale F (1982) Perceived sweetness and redness in colored sucrose solutions. J Food Sci 47(3):747–752
Jousmaki V, Hari R (1998) Parchment-skin illusion: sound-biased touch. Curr Biol 8(6):R190. [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70120-4
Kaplan RA, Enticott PG, Hohwy J, Castle DJ, Rossell SL (2014) Is body dysmorphic disorder associated with abnormal bodily self-awareness? A study using the rubber hand illusion. PLoS One 9(6):e99981
Kayser C, Petkov CI, Augath M, Logothetis NK (2007) Functional imaging reveals visual modulation of specific fields in auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27(8):1824–1835. 27/8/1824 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4737-06.2007
Kim T, Kerschensteiner D (2017) Inhibitory control of feature selectivity in an object motion sensitive circuit of the retina. Cell Rep 19(7):1343–1350
Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27(12):712–719
Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L (2007) Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS One 2(9):e943
Lenggenhager B, Tadi T, Metzinger T, Blanke O (2007) Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317(5841):1096–1099. 317/5841/1096 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439
Lewis R, Noppeney U (2010) Audiovisual synchrony improves motion discrimination via enhanced connectivity between early visual and auditory areas. J Neurosci 30(37):12329–12339. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5745-09.201030/37/12329. [pii]
Maoiléidigh DÓ, Ricci AJ (2019) A bundle of mechanisms: inner-ear hair-cell mechanotransduction. Trends Neurosci 42:221
Massaro DW, Cohen MM, Smeele PM (1996) Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech. J Acoust Soc Am 100(3):1777–1786
McDonald JJ, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Hillyard SA (2000) Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature 407(6806):906–908. https://doi.org/10.1038/35038085
McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264(5588):746–748
Meredith MA, Nemitz JW, Stein BE (1987) Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. J Neurosci 7(10):3215–3229
Meredith MA, Stein BE (1983) Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science 221(4608):389–391
Meredith MA, Stein BE (1986a) Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus. Brain Res 365(2):350–354
Meredith MA, Stein BE (1986b) Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol 56(3):640–662
Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA (1983) Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci 6:414–417
Mishra J, Martinez A, Sejnowski TJ, Hillyard SA (2007) Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. J Neurosci 27(15):4120–4131
Morein-Zamir S, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A (2003) Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17(1):154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00089-2. [pii]
O’Connor DH, Fukui MM, Pinsk MA, Kastner S (2002) Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1203
Radeau M, Bertelson P (1977) Adaptation to auditory-visual discordance and ventriloquism in semirealistic situations. Percept Psychophys 22(2):137–146
Rauschecker JP (2018) Where, when, and how: are they all sensorimotor? Towards a unified view of the dorsal pathway in vision and audition. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior 98:262–268
Rensselaer Av (1955). Fun with ventriloquism. New York: Garden City Books.
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, Fogassi L (1996) Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res 3(2):131–141
Rock I, Victor J (1964) Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143(3606):594–596
Rohe T, Ehlis A-C, Noppeney U (2019) The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception. Nat Commun 10(1):1907. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09664-2
Rohe T, Noppeney U (2015a) Cortical hierarchies perform Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS Biol 13(2):e1002073
Rohe T, Noppeney U (2015b) Sensory reliability shapes perceptual inference via two mechanisms. J Vis 15(5):1–16
Rohe T, Noppeney U (2016) Distinct computational principles govern multisensory integration in primary sensory and association cortices. Curr Biol 26(4):509–514
Schroeder CE, Wilson DA, Radman T, Scharfman H, Lakatos P (2010) Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(2):172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.010
Sekuler R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385(6614):308
Shams L, Beierholm UR (2010) Causal inference in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 14(9):425–432
Shams L, Iwaki S, Chawla A, Bhattacharya J (2005) Early modulation of visual cortex by sound: an MEG study. Neurosci Lett 378(2):76–81
Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear. Nature 408(6814):788. https://doi.org/10.1038/35048669
Shipley T (1964) Auditory flutter-driving of visual flicker. Science 145(3638):1328–1330
Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Stein BE, Stanford TR (2008) Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(4):255–266. nrn2331 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2331
Tian B, Kuśmierek P, Rauschecker JP (2013) Analogues of simple and complex cells in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(19):7892–7897
Tian B, Reser D, Durham A, Kustov A, Rauschecker JP (2001) Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science 292(5515):290–293. 292/5515/290 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058911
Usrey WM, Alitto HJ (2015) Visual functions of the thalamus. Ann Rev Vision Sci 1:351–371
Wallace MT, Roberson GE, Hairston WD, Stein BE, Vaughan JW, Schirillo JA (2004) Unifying multisensory signals across time and space. Exp Brain Res 158(2):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1899-9
Warren DH, Cleaves WT (1971) Visual-proprioceptive interaction under large amounts of conflict. J Exp Psychol 90(2):206–214
Welch RB, Warren DH (1980) Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol Bull 88(3):638–667
Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9(4):625–636
Wong HY (2017) On proprioception in action: multimodality versus deafferentation. Mind Lang 32(3):259–282
Zampini M, Spence C (2004) The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J Sens Stud 19(5):347–363
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rohe, T., Zeise, M.L. (2021). Inputs, Outputs, and Multisensory Processing. In: Zeise, M.L. (eds) Neuroscience for Psychologists. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47645-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47645-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47644-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47645-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)