Abstract
This chapter presents a survey of the different methods used to reconstitute long-run income estimations for the Latin American regions. The main purpose is to alert on potential biases derived from them. Although the bottom-up approaches based on the direct estimation of aggregate production, income or expenditure are the preferred option, they have barely been used. The main reason is that all of them are highly data-demanding. Instead, the indirect non-parametric approaches, combined sometimes with direct estimations for agriculture and extractive industries, have been the most recurrent way to estimate output. Out of the nine countries in the sample, seven have followed this “mixed approach” (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Venezuela and Uruguay). Meanwhile, the Peruvian estimates follow a parametric approach and the Colombian estimates backwardly discount the regional growth rates of proxy variables to current official regional estimates. Apart from other considerations, this issue should be taken into account when comparing the substantial differences across countries with regard to regional income disparities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
EUROSTAT has regularly published regional GDP since 1995. For earlier years see the REGIO-database, which follows ESA 1979 and dates back to 1979.
- 2.
There are estimates since the mid-nineteenth century for Great Britain (Crafts 2005; Geary and Stark 2016), for Spain (Martinez-Galarraga et al. 2010, 2015), for Italy (Felice 2011), for Portugal (Badia-Miró et al. 2012), for Belgium (Buyst 2010, 2011), for Sweden (Enflo et al. 2014) and for France (Combes et al. 2011; Díez-Minguela and Sanchis 2019; Caruana-Galizia 2013; Bazot 2014). Additionally, in a recent publication Rosés and Wolf (2019) have gathered some of these estimates and added those for other countries such as Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland and the United States.
- 3.
In Chile, the Banco Central de Chile, founded in 1925, is in charge of national accounting.
- 4.
All the countries in this book have carried out census rounds since 1970 following the concepts, definitions and recommendations of the United Nations—Statistics Division (UNSD).
- 5.
The first official estimate in Brazil dates back to 1939, while national accounting was annually published since 1947.
- 6.
The publication of official series of national GDP dates back to 1935 in Argentina, 1988 in Bolivia, 1939 in Brazil, 1960 in Chile, 1970 in Colombia, 1939 in Mexico, 1970 in Peru, 1983 in Uruguay and 1950 in Venezuela by Banco Central de Venezuela and the INE since 1997.
- 7.
Rosés and Wolf (2019) also include a chapter on the long-run evolution of regional inequality in the United States.
- 8.
In Bolivia, for instance, the earliest agricultural census was conducted in 1950. Then, a similar effort was attempted in 1984, but it did not include information on the capital city of La Paz or information on the indigenous communities who mistrusted the data-collection process. In 2012, however, another agricultural census was carried out. Similarly, industrial surveys started to be regularly published since 1972. This anecdotal evidence illustrates the distinct challenges and difficulties faced by census-takers and national statistical offices.
- 9.
In Uruguay the balance between the huge number of agrarian surveys (1852, 1900, 1908, 1916, 1924, 1937, 1943, 1951, 1956, 1966, 1970 and 1980) and the limited number of industrial surveys (1936, 1975, 1988, 1997) and population censuses (1850, 1860, 1908, 1963, 1985, 1996, 2011) is quite disproportionate.
- 10.
In Europe, in countries with agricultural and industrial surveys the researchers have tended to follow the direct approach based on production to estimate the regional value added for agriculture, livestock and manufacturing, as, for instance, Schulz (2000, 2007) does for the Austria-Hungary Empire, Combes et al. (2011) for France, Stohr (2018) for Switzerland, Ciccarelli and Fenoaltea (2009) for Italy.
- 11.
Several sources have been combined; among them are the Tercer Censo Nacional de la República Argentina, the Boletín del Departamento Nacional del Trabajo for 1907 and 1912, and the Anuario Estadístico del Trabajo for (1916).
- 12.
Bértola et al. (2012) provide estimates for 1872 and 1895. However, these data have been adjusted to 1895 according to the benchmark fit for this book’s dataset.
- 13.
The most outstanding example of the income approach was offered by Delefortrie and Morice (1959) for France in 1954. These researchers assembled a well-stocked set of statistical sources to estimate regional incomes. A similar effort was made by Combes et al. (2011) to estimate the manufacturing and services value added for the French departments in 1860 and 1930. In both years agrarian and industrial surveys were available that were combined with fiscal sources, population and establishment censuses and government budgets, among other registers, to estimate the incomes by sector at the regional level.
- 14.
There is no evidence of the use of fiscal sources in the Latin American countries, but it has been used to estimate the historical databases of the European countries. Some examples are France (Bazot 2014; Combes et al. 2011; Delefortrie and Morice 1959), Spain (Martinez-Galarraga et al. 2019; Díez-Minguela et al. 2018), the United Kingdom (Crafts 2005).
- 15.
An interesting example that demonstrates a lack of representativeness is the use of fiscal revenues to make the distribution. Usually, in the past taxes related with the exercise of agrarian or manufacturing activities were levied on individuals. Thus, the individuals subject to the tax did not represent the whole population of active establishments. There used to be some income or size establishments exempt from the fiscal levy and also a high level of tax evasion. In these cases, the fiscal revenues overestimate the output of the richest regions, usually better represented by the tax, and underestimate that of the poorest regions where low-size activities predominate (Díez-Minguela and Sanchis 2019). Activities not subject to fiscal levies in the past included the army, public services, professional activities, household activities and small size establishments (Delefortrie and Morice 1959). To correct the biases the tax information should be combined with other sources, such as population, land and manufacturing censuses.
- 16.
Geary and Stark (2002, 2016) for Great Britain, Martinez-Galarraga et al. (2010, 2013, 2015) for Spain, Felice (2005a, b) for Italy, Badia-Miró et al. (2012) for Portugal, Buyst (2010) for Belgium, Sweden, Enflo et al. (2014), Díez-Minguela and Sanchis (2019) and Rosés and Sanchis (2019) for France, Enflo (2014) for Finland.
- 17.
Some datasets of European historical estimates have been constructed combining direct estimates based on production for some industries with others based on Geary & Stark. For instance, Schulze (2007, 2019) for Austria-Hungary, Felice (2011, 2019) for Italy, Martinez-Galarraga et al. (2011) for Spain.
- 18.
- 19.
The stability of the parameters across time has been tested by Díez-Minguela and Sanchis (2019) for France in 1911. They compare regional income estimates obtained using parameters estimated for different benchmark years. These results clearly confirm the instability of the estimated parameters and, therefore, question the consistency of regional income estimates.
References
Aguilar-Retureta, J. (2015). The GDP per capita of the Mexican regions (1895–1930): New estimates. Revista de Historia Económica, 33 (3): 387–423.
Azzoni, C. (1997). Concentração Regional e Dispersão das Rendas Per Capita Estaduais: Análise a partir de Séries Históricas Estaduais de PIB, 1939–1995. Estudos Econômicos, 27 (3): 341–393.
Badia-Miró, M., Guilera, J., and Lains, P. (2012). Regional incomes in Portugal: Industrialization, integration and inequality, 1890–1980. Revista de Historia Económica, 30 (2): 225–244.
Bazot, G. (2014). Interregional inequalities, convergence, and growth in France from 1840 to 1911. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 113/114, 309–345.
Bértola, L., Castelnovo, C. and Willebald, H. (2012). “Income Distribution in Brazil, 1870–1920.” Montevideo: Banco Central del Uruguay, XVII Jornadas Anuales de Economía.
Buyst, E. (2010). Reversal of fortune in a small, open economy: Regional GDP in Belgium, 1896–2000. Rivista di Storia Economica, 26, 75–92.
———. (2011). Continuity and change in regional disparities in Belgium during the twentieth century. Journal of Historical Geography, 37, 329–337.
Caruana-Galizia, P. (2013). Estimating French regional income: Departmental per capita gross value added, 1872–1911. Research in Economic History, 29, 71–95.
Castro, P. and Willebald, H. (2019). “Producto PIB regional en Uruguay durante la Primera Globalización (1872–1908): menor desigualad y convergencia entre regions”. Serie Documento de Trabajo, Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de Administración, Universidad de la República, Montevideo.
Ciccarelli, C. and Fenoaltea, S. (2009). La produzione industrial delle regioni d’Italia., 1861–1913: Una ricostruzione quantitative. La industrienon-manifatturiere. Roma: Banca d’Italia.
Combes P. P., Lafourcade M., Thisse J. F. and Toutain, J. C. (2011). The rise and fall of spatial inequalities in France: A long run perspective. Explorations in Economic History, 48, 2, 243–271.
Crafts, N.F.R. (2005). Regional GDP in Britain, 1871–1911: Some estimates. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 1, 54–64.
Delefortrie, N., and Morice, J. (1959). Les revenus départementaux en 1864 et 1954. Paris: Armand Colin.
Díez-Minguela, A. and Sanchis, M.T. (2019). Regional income inequality in France: What does history teach us? Historical Methods: Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 52, 1, 1–14.
Díez-Minguela, A., Martinez-Galarraga, J., Tirado, D. A. (2018). Regional inequality in Spain, 1860–2015. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Enflo, K. (2014). Finland’s regional GDPs: estimates, sources and interpretations. Lund Papers in Economic History. General Issues. N. 135. Department of Economic History. Lund University.
Enflo, K., Henning, M. and Schön, L. (2014). Swedish Regional GDP 1855–2000: Estimations and general trends in the Swedish regional system. Research in Economic History, 30, 47–89.
Felice, E. (2005a). Il reddito delle regioni italiane nel 1938 e nel 1951. Una stima basata sul costo del lavoro. Rivista di Storia Economica, XXI(1), 3–30.
Felice, E. (2005b). Il valore aggiunto regionale. Una stima per il 1891 e per il 1911 e alcune elaborazioni di lungo periodo (1891–1971). Rivista di Storia Economica, XXI(3), 273–314.
Felice, E. (2019). The roots of a dual equilibrium: GDP, productivity and structural change in the Italian regions in the long run (1871–2011). European Review of Economic History, 23, 4, 499–528.
Felice, E. (2011). Regional value added in Italy, 1891–2001, and the foundation of a long-term picture. Economic History Review, 64, 3, 929–950.
Geary, F., and Stark, T. (2002). Examining Ireland’s post-famine economic growth performance. Economic Journal, 112, 919–935.
Geary, F., and Stark, L. (2015). Regional GDP in the UK, 1861–1911: New estimates. Economic History Review, 68, 123–144.
Geary, F., and Stark, T. (2016). What happened to regional inequality in Britain in the twentieth century? Economic History Review, 69, 1, 215–228.
German-Soto, V. (2005). Generación del producto interno bruto Mexicano for entidad federativa, 1940–1992. Trimestre Economico, 72, 287, 617–653.
Good, D.F. (1994). The economic lag of Central and Eastern Europe: Income and estimates for the Habsburg successor states, 1870–1910. Journal of Economic History, 45(4): 869–891.
Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Storper, M. (2018). Regional inequality in Europe: Evidence, theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Geography, 19, 2, 273–298.
Martinez-Galarraga, J., Rosés, J. R. and Tirado, D. A. (2010). The upswing of regional income inequality in Spain, 1860–1930. Explorations in Economic History, 47, 2, 244–257.
———. (2015). The long-term patterns of regional income inequality in Spain (1860–2000). Regional Studies, 49, 4, 502–517.
Martinez-Galarraga, J., Paluzie, E., and Tirado, D. A. (2013). Trade policy and wage gradients: evidence from a protectionis turn. Cliometrica, 7, 3, 295–318.
Martinez-Galarraga, J., Rodríguez Miranda, A., Siniscalchi, S. and Willebald, H. (2019). La distribución regional de la producción en Uruguay, 1908–1975: propuesta metodológica y fuentes. Documentos de Trabajo, DT 13/2019. Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administración, Universidad de la República, Uruguay.
Missiaia, A. and Enflo, K. (2020). Regional GDP before GDP. A methodological survey of historical regional accounts. In: Molena, M. and Svensson, S. (eds.) Regional Economic development and history. Regions and Cities. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 82–97.
N.F.R Crafts, N. F. R. (1983). Gross national product in Europe 1870–1910: Some new estimates. Explorations in Economic History 20, 2, 387–401.
Pammer, M. (1997). Proxy data and income estimates: The economic lag of central and eastern Europe. Journal of Economic History, 57, 2, 448–455.
Rodríguez-Miranda, A. and Goinheix, S. (2018). Estimación del VAB departamental en Uruguay y evolución en el período 1981–2011. Documentos de Trabajo, DT 03/2018. Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administración, Universidad de la República, Uruguay.
Rosés, J. R. and Wolf, N. (2019). “Regional economic development in Europe, 1900–2010: A description of the patterns”. In: Wolf, N. and Rosés, J. R. (eds.) The Economic Development of Europe’s regions: A quantitative history since 1900, 3–41. London: Routledge Explorations in Economic History, Routledge.
Rosés, J. R. and Sanchis, M. T. (2019). A long run perspective on French Regional Income Inequalities, 1860–2010. In: Wolf, N. and Rosés, J. R. (eds.), The Economic Development of Europe’s regions. A quantitative history since 1900. London: Routledge Explorations in Economic History, Routledge, 129–148.
Seminario, B. and Zegarra, M. A. (2016). La evolución de la desigualdad regional en el Perú: Estimación del PIB de las distintas regiones del Perú, 1795–2012. https://bit.ly/2xiVCDx
Schulz, M. S. (2000). Patterns of growth and stagnation in the late nineteenth century Habsburg economy. European Review of Economic History, 4, 3, 311–240.
Schulze, M.-S. (2007). Regional income dispersion and market potential in the late nineteenth century Hapsburg Empire. Economic History Working Papers 106/07. Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Schulze, M.-S (2019). From empire to republic: regional inequality in Austria, 1870-2014, chapter 3.1, 42–69 in Rosés and Wolf (ed.). The economic development of Europe’s regions. A quantitative Economic history since 1900. Routledge Explorations in Economic History, London, Routledge, 42–69.
Stohr, C. (2018). Multiple Core Regions: Regional Inequality in Switzerland, 1860–2008. Researh in Economic History, 34, 135–198.
Valecillos, H. (1998). Impactos regionales del crecimiento y la contracción económica en Venezuela, 1936–1990. Caracas: Banco Central de Venezuela.
Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13, 1–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Díez-Minguela, A., Sanchis Llopis, M.T. (2020). Comparing Different Estimation Methodologies of Regional GDPs in Latin American Countries. In: Tirado-Fabregat, D.A., Badia-Miró, M., Willebald, H. (eds) Time and Space. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47553-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47553-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47552-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47553-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)