Skip to main content

Ubiquity with a Dark Side: Civil-Military Gaps in Social Media Usage

Part of the Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications book series (ASTSA)

Abstract

Most college undergraduates are Millennials or Generation Z members. These generations are ferocious social media consumers across a range of platforms. Research exists on the U.S. military’s adoption of social media, but less is known about the everyday implications of social media use and how service members might differ in their uses from their civilian peers. Using survey data comparing (N = 960) American civilian college students, Reserve Officer Training Corps cadets, and military academy cadets, we examine how these groups use social media, the educational and social impacts of this usage, and experiences with self-censorship and anxiety. We find a civilian-military gap when it comes to social media uses and experiences. Social media is more adverse for civilians than academy cadets in terms of time usage, impact on education, and experiences with the darker dimensions such as cyber-bullying and harassment. Civilians also practice less self-censorship of social media posts than cadets.

Keywords

  • Social media
  • Time use
  • Academic impact
  • Cyberbullying
  • Civil-military gap

Readers should be aware that the views of the authors are their own and do not purport to represent the views of their respective academies, the Departments of the Air Force and Army, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47511-6_2
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-47511-6
  • Instant EPUB and PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-47513-0
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    See shipping information.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-47510-9
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Free shipping worldwide
    See shipping information.
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout

Notes

  1. 1.

    Generations are typically a group of people born within the same time period. Scholars sometimes use the word “generation” to refer to a birth cohort. The following labels and birth years are typically associated generations in the United States: G.I. Generation (1901–1924); Silent Generation (1924–1945); Baby Boomers (1946–early 1960s); Generation X (early 1960s–1980); Millennials (1981–mid to late 1990s); and Generation Z (late 1990s–present) (See Ender et al. 2014).

  2. 2.

    Our civilian samples are not restrictive – all eligible university students can complete the survey.

  3. 3.

    The previous study is known as the Bi-Annual Attitude Survey of Students (BASS). The GENZ is a continuation of the previous study with new and updated questions – specifically, questions related to social media not asked on the BASS (Ender et al. 2014).

  4. 4.

    Military academies are all-inclusive and exclusive university level boarding schools where all cadets live, work, and study together. In the United States they include the United States Military Academy at West Point, NY, the United States Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, CO, the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD, and the United States Coast Guard Academy at New London, CT. The Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) is another source of officer accessions. Officer Candidate School (OCS) and direct commissioning are two further sources. They consist of university or college student-cadets that attend civilian universities across the United States, participate in military education and training on campus, but live and study with their civilian peers.

  5. 5.

    The group Ns remain stable across each question with no more than 1–4 response differences based on missing values for each question.

References

  • Anderson M (2018) A majority of teens have experienced some form of cyberbullying. Pew Research Center [online]. Available from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/09/27/a-majority-of-teens-have-experienced-some-form-of-cyberbullying/

  • Bell DB, Schumm WR, Scott B, Ender MG (1999) The desert FAX: calling home from Somalia. Armed Forces Soc 25(3):509–521

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovici J (2010) Who coined ‘social media’? Web pioneers compete for credit. Forbes (December 9) [online]. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2010/12/09/who-coined-social-media-web-pioneers-compete-for-credit/#1b3e9dc51d52

  • boyd D (2007) Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D (ed) MacArthur Foundation series on digital learning – youth, identity, and digital media volume. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd D, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Common Sense Media (2015) The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens [online]. [Viewed June 25, 2019]. Available from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens

  • Danesi M (2019) Popular culture: introductory perspectives, 4th edn. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey M, Brafman O (2018) Radical inclusion: what the post-9/11 world should have taught us about leadership. Missionday

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (DoD), Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Community and Family Policy (2017) 2017 demographics: profile of the military community

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimock M (2019) Defining generations: where millennials end and generation Z begins [online]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

  • Ender MG (1995) G.I. phone home: the use of telecommunications by the soldiers of operation just cause. Armed Forces Soc 21(3):335–334

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG (2005) Divergences in traditional and new communication media use among army families. In: Ouellet E (ed) New directions in military sociology. de Sitter Publications, Whitby, pp 255–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG (2009) American soldiers in Iraq: McSoldiers or innovative professionals? Routledge, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG, Segal DR (1996) V(E)-mail to the foxhole: isolation, (tele)communication, and forward deployed soldiers. J Polit Mi Sociol 24(1):83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG, Segal DR (1998) Cyber-soldiering: race, class, gender and new media use in the military. In: Ebo B (ed) Cyberghetto or cybertopia: race, class, and gender on the internet. Praeger Publishers, Westport, pp 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG, Rohall DE, Matthews MD (2014) The millennial generation and national defense: attitudes of future military and civilian leaders. Palgrave Pivot, Basingstoke/New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ender MG, Rohall DE, Matthews MD (2016) Cadet and civilian undergraduate attitudes toward transgender people: a research note. Armed Forces Soc 42(2):427–435

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Moreland JJ (2014) The dark side of social networking sites: an exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput Hum Behav 45:168–176

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen KJ (1991) The saturated self. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1961) Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CH (1997) Postmodern war: the new politics of conflict. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CH, Gordo ÁJ (2014) Social media in conflict comparing military and social-movement technocultures. Cult Polit 10(3):251–261

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman M (2015) Milblogs and soldier representations of the Afghanistan War: the case of Sweden. Media, War Conflict 9(1):43–57

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman M, Wagnsson C (2013) New media and the war in Afghanistan: the significance of blogging for the Swedish strategic narrative. New Media Soc 17(1):6–23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman M, Olsson E-K, Charlotte Wagnsson C (2016) EU armed forces’ use of social media in areas of deployment. Media Commun 4(1):51–62

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntsman A, Stein RL (2015) Digital militarism: Israel’s occupation in the social media age. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laurence JH, Milavec BL, Rohall DE, Ender MG, Matthews MD (2017) Predictors of support for women in military roles: military status, gender, and political ideology. Milit Psychol 28(6):488–497 [online]. Available from: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/mil/index.aspx

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson S (2014) The US military’s social media civil war: technology as antagonism in discourses of information-age conflict. Camb Rev Int Aff 27(2):226–245

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A, Radovic A, Miller E, Colditz JB, Hoffman BL, Giles LM, Primack BA (2016) Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depress Anxiety 33:323–331

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby S, Thornham H (2016) The digital mundane: social media and the military. Media, Cult Soc 38(8):1153–1168

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews MD, Ender MG, Laurence J, Rohall DE (2009) Role of group affiliation and gender attitudes toward women in the military. Mil Psychol 21(2):241–251

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz J (1993) No sense of pace: the impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees T (2015) The Canadian Armed Forces “YouTube war”: a cross-border military-social media complex. Glob Media J 8(1):71–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson E-K, Deverell E, Wagnsson C, Hellman M (2016) EU armed forces and social media: convergence or divergence? Def Stud 16(2):97–117

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Poster M (1995) The second media age. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon 9(5):1–6

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rohall DE, Ender MG, Matthews MD (2006) The effects of military affiliation, gender, and political ideology on attitudes toward the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Armed Forces Soc 33(1):59–77

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm WR, Bell DB, Ender MG, Rice RE (2004) Expectations, use, and evaluations of communications media among deployed peacekeepers. Armed Forces Soc 30(4):649–662

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Semaan B, Britton LM, Dosono B (2017) Military masculinity and the travails of transitioning: disclosure in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Feb/Mar), pp 387–403 [online]. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2998221

  • Sherman MD, Rudi JH, Westerhof L, Borden LM (2016) Social media communication among military spouses: review of research and recommendations for moving forward. Mil Behav Health 4(4):325–333

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestri LE (2015) Friended at the front: social media in the American war zone. University Kansas Press, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Anderson M (2019) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center (March 1) [online]. Available from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/

  • Spies Shapiro LA, Margolin G (2014) Growing up wired: social networking sties and adolescent psychosocial development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 17(1):1–18

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tait S (2008) Pornographies of violence? Internet spectatorship on body horror. Crit Stud Media Commun 25(1):91–111

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (1995) Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge J (2006) Generation me: why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled – and more miserable than ever before. Free Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge J (2017) iGen: why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy – and completely unprepared for adulthood – and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Books, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall M (2010) In the battle(field): the US military, blogging and the struggle for authority. Media, Cult Soc 32(5):863–872

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin K. De Angelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Angelis, K.K., Kelty, R., Ender, M.G., Rohall, D.E., Matthews, M.D. (2020). Ubiquity with a Dark Side: Civil-Military Gaps in Social Media Usage. In: Moehlecke de Baseggio​, E., Schneider, O., Szvircsev Tresch, T. (eds) Social Media and the Armed Forces. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47511-6_2

Download citation