Abstract
In this chapter, Cush re-examines Schools Council Working Paper 36 (Schools Council 1971), subsequently recognised to be a ‘game-changing’ moment in English religious education (RE), shaping RE for decades and still influential today. Proposals of the ‘working paper’ are explored, as well as some of the criticisms that have been made of both the document and Smart’s ‘phenomenological’ approach to RE which it endorsed. To some extent defending both the working paper and Smart, she also recognises the many developments in both the religious landscape and academic study of religion which necessitate a new ‘game-changing’ move in English RE. Could the recommendations of the Commission on RE (CoRE 2018) mark the beginning of a new era for RE in England?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Alberts, W. (2007). Integrative Religious Education in Europe: A Study-of Religions Approach. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Barnes, P. L. (2002). Working Paper 36, Christian Confessionalism and Phenomenological Religious Education. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 6(1), 61–77.
Bowie, B., Petersen, A., & Revell, L. (2012). Post-Secular Trends: Issues in Education and Faith (Editorial). Journal of Beliefs and Values, 33(2), 139–141.
Chater, M., & Erricker, C. (2013). Does Religious Education Have a Future? Pedagogical and Policy Prospects. Abingdon: Routledge.
Copley, T. (1997). Teaching Religion: Fifty Years of Religious Education in England and Wales. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
CoRE (Commission on Religious Education). (2018). Final Report: Religion and Worldviews, the Way Forward: A National Plan for RE. London: RE Council. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from https://www.commissiononre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Final-Report-of-the-Commission-on-RE.pdf.
Cox, J. L. (2006). A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debate. London: Continuum.
Cush, D. (2020, forthcoming). Time for a Change? An Analysis of the Major Issues in English Religious Education Emerging from the Work of the Commission on Religious Education 2016–2018. In D. Lankshear & L. J. Francis (Eds.), Religious and Values Education: Contextual Challenges. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang.
Cush, D., & Robinson, C. (2014). Developments in Religious Studies: Towards a Dialogue with Religious Education. British Journal of Religious Education, 36(1), 4–17.
Cush, D., & Robinson, C. (2020, in press). ‘Buddhism Isn’t a Religion But Paganism Is’ The Applicability of the Concept of ‘Religion’ to Dharmic and Nature-Based Traditions, and the Implications for Religious Education. In P. Hannam & G. Biesta (Eds.), Religion and Education: The Forgotten Dimensions of Religious Education? Brill|Shine.
Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flood, G. (1999). Beyond Phenomenology: Rethinking the Study of Religion. London: Cassell.
Franken, L. (2016). The Freedom of Religion and the Freedom of Education in 21st Century Belgium. British Journal of Religious Education, 38(3), 308–324.
Hannam, P. (2019). Religious Education and the Public Sphere. Abingdon: Routledge.
Heelas, P. (2002). The Spiritual Revolution: from ‘Religion’ to ‘Spirituality’. In L. Woodhead, P. Fletcher, H. Kawanami, & D. Smith (Eds.), Religions in the Modern World (pp. 357–377). London: Routledge.
Holloway, R. (2016, May 13). The Rainbow of Religious Belief: why extremist thinking doesn’t work. The Guardian. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/nov/13/the-rainbow-of-religious-belief-why-extremist-thinking-doesnt-work-richard-holloway.
Jackson, R. (1997). Religious Education: an Interpretive Approach. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Lähnemann, J. (2008). Introduction—Interreligious and Values Education: Challenges, Developments and Projects in Europe. In J. Lähnemann & P. Schreiner (Eds.), Interreligious and Values Education in Europe. Münster: Comenius Institute.
Nesbitt, E. (2011). Sikh Diversity in the UK: Contexts and Evolution. In K. A. Jacobsen & K. Myrvold (Eds.), Sikhs in Europe: Migrations, Identity and Representations (pp. 225–252). Farnham: Ashgate.
Nynäs, P. (2018). Making Space for a Dialogical Notion of Religious Subjects: A Critical Discussion from the Perspective of Postsecularity and Religious Change in the West. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 31(1), 54–71.
Owen, S. (2011). The World Religions Paradigm: Time for a Change. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–268.
Rudge, J. (2000). The Westhill Project. In M. Grimmitt (Ed.), Pedagogies of Religious Education. Great Wakering: McCrimmons.
Schools Council. (1971). Working Paper 36: Religious Education in Secondary Schools. London: Evans/Methuen.
Smart, N. (1968). Secular Education and the Logic of Religion. London: Faber and Faber.
Smart, N. (1971). The Religious Experience of Mankind. London: Collins.
Smart, N. (1975). What Is Religion? In N. Smart & D. Horder (Eds.), New Movements in Religious Education (pp. 13–22). London: Temple Smith.
Smart, N. (1979). The Phenomenon of Christianity. London: Collins.
Smart, N. (1995). The Values of Religious Studies. The Journal of Beliefs and Values., 16(2), 7–10.
Smart, N., & Alves, C. (1976). Donald Horder. Learning for Living, 16(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00239707608556936.
Sutcliffe, S. J. (2004). Introduction. In S. J. Sutcliffe (Ed.), Religion: Empirical Studies (pp. xvii–xliii). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Taves, A. (2020). From Religious Studies to Worldview Studies. Religion, 50(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681124.
Teece, G. (1993). In Defence of Theme Teaching in Religious Education. Birmingham: Westhill RE Centre.
Teece, G. (2017). Religious Education Needs a Rebrand—It Should Be Fascinating, Challenging and Hard. TES. Retrieved from https://www.tes.com/news/religious-education-needs-rebrand-it-should-be-fascinating-challenging-and-hard.
ter Avest, I., Bertraam-Troost, G. D., & Miedema, S. (2011). Religious Education in a Pillarised and Postsecular Age in the Netherlands. In L. Franken & P. Loobuyck (Eds.), Religious Education in a Plural, Secularised Society: A Paradigm Shift (pp. 85–98). Münster: Waxmann.
Woodhead, L. (2012). Introduction. In L. Woodhead & R. Catto (Eds.), Religion and Change in Modern Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
Woodhead, L. (2016, January 19). Why No Religion Is the New Religion. Talk Given at the British Academy. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPLsuW-TCtA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cush, D. (2021). Changing the Game in English Religious Education: 1971 and 2018. In: Franck, O., Thalén, P. (eds) Religious Education in a Post-Secular Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47503-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47503-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47502-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47503-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)