Abstract
Religious education in the Compulsory School in Iceland has since 2013 been a part of the Social Studies National Curriculum Guide together with geography, history, sociology, life skills education and ethics. This was done among other things to remove walls between subjects in the school. In the general part of the Icelandic National Curriculum Guide we find a description of what is called six fundamental pillars of education that are to be mirrored in all school activities in kindergarten, elementary and secondary schools. The six fundamental pillars reflect the education policies in Iceland. The question is how these fundamental pillars influence the religious education in times of growing religious diversity. When looking at the discussion about some of the subjects included in Social Studies in the curriculum guide we find the concept “transformative education”. According to the discussion, transformative education aims to strengthen students’ democratic competence and critical thinking and help them to clarify their own values, as well as encouraging them to engage in individual or joint civil action to make the world a better place to live in. The question arises how far the school can go in encouraging students to take action in matters that might be seen as political or controversial. In the chapter changes in religious education in Iceland are taken as an example of religious education in post-secular times and discussed how it has become a part of social studies and how the social studies, including religious education, is connected to what is called the fundamental pillars of education in the Icelandic National Curriculum Guide. That leads to questions about approaches and objectives of social studies and of religious education and in that regard the question arises if so-called transformative education is possible in religious education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, Group Identity, and Citizenship Education in a Global Age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139.
Bellah, R. (2001). Between Religion and Social Science. In R. Bellah (Ed.), Beyond Belief. Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditionalist World (2nd ed., pp. 237–259). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Berger, P. (1999). The Desecularization of the World: A Global Over view. In P. Berger (Ed.), The Desecularization of the World. Resurgent Religion and World Politics (pp. 1–18). Washington: Eerdmans Publishing.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). How to Exist Politically and Learn from It: Hanna Arendt and the Problem of Democratic Education. Teachers college Record, 112(2), 556–575.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Learning Democracy in School and Society. Education, Lifelong Learning and the Politics of Citizenship. Rotterdam; Boston; Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Campbell, E. (2003). The Ethical Teacher. Berkshire and New York: Open University Press.
Clarke, P. B. (1996). Deep Citizenship. London: Pluta Press.
Compulsory School Act, No. 91/2008 [Lög um grunnskóla, nr. 91/2008].
Grimmitt, M. (1987). Religious Education and Human Development. The Relationship Between Studying Religions and Personal, Social and Moral Education. Wakering: McCrimmons.
Gunnarsson, G. J. (2018). Is a ‘Life Question Approach’ Appropriate when Religious Education has Become a Part of Social Studies? In J. Ristiniemi, G. Skeie, & K. Sporre (Eds.), Challenging Life: Existential Questions as a Resource for Education (pp. 69–82). Münster and New York: Waxmann.
Gunnarsson, G. J., Ragnarsdóttir, H., Finnbogason, G. E., & Jónsdóttir, H. (2016). Young People’s Views on Religions in a Multicultural Society. Theological Journal. Special issue “Shifting borders in Religious Education”, 69(1), 93–109.
Kirman, J. M. (1992). Values, Technology, and Social Studies. McGill Journal of Education, 27(1), 5–18.
Kirman, J. M. (2003). Transformative Geography: Ethics and Action in Elementary and Secondary Geography Education. The Journal of Geography, 102(3), 93–98.
Knauth, T., & Körs, A. (2011). The ‘Contextual Setting Approach’: A Contribution to Understanding How Young People View and Experience Religion and Education in Europe. British Journal of Religious Education, 33(2), 209–223.
Milot, M. (2007). The Religious Dimension in Intercultural Education. In J. Keast (Ed.), Religious Diversity and Intercultural Education: A Reference Book for Schools (pp. 19–30). Strasbourg: The Council of Europe.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
The Icelandic National Curriculum Guide for Compulsory Schools—With Subject Areas. (2013). Reykjavik, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching About Religions and Beliefs in Public Schools. (2007). OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODHIR). Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/odihr/29154?download=true.
Weisse, W. (2010). REDCo: A European Research Project on Religion in Education. Religion and Education, 37, 187–202.
Ziebertz, H.-G., Kalbheim, B., & Riegel, U. (2006). A Typology of Religious Attitudes Among Young People in Germany. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 27(2), 203–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gunnarsson, G.J. (2021). What About Transformative Religious Education?. In: Franck, O., Thalén, P. (eds) Religious Education in a Post-Secular Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47503-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47503-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47502-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47503-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)