Advertisement

Mapping Trajectories of Displacement

Chapter
  • 216 Downloads

Abstract

Awan gives an overview of recent work that attempts to trace the movement of undocumented migrants across international borders. It explores the ways in which such movement has been conceptualised, for example through describing truncated journeys, clandestine routes, and migrant trajectories understood as phases of movement and stasis. It then discusses the methodologies used to research and analyse this movement, with a particular emphasis on visual and participatory methods, including the role of digital technologies. The chapter concludes with a discussion on the politics and ethics of making visible what are clandestine journeys.

References

  1. Achilli, L. (2018). The ‘good’ smuggler: The ethics and morals of human smuggling among Syrians. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 676(1), 77–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217746641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahsan Ullah, A. (2013). Theoretical rhetoric about migration networks: A case of a journey of Bangladeshi workers to Malaysia. International Migration, 51(3), 151–168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00579.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awan, N. (2016). Migrant narratives of citizenship: A topological atlas of European belonging [Exhibition, Yorkshire Sculpture Park]. Retrieved from http://www.ysp.co.uk/exhibitions/nishat-awan.
  4. Bastos, M., & Walker, S. T. (2018, April 11). Facebook’s data lockdown is a disaster for academic researchers. The Conversation. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://theconversation.com/facebooks-data-lockdown-is-a-disaster-for-academic-researchers-94533.
  5. Bruns, A. (2018, April 25). Facebook shuts the gate after the horse has bolted, and hurts real research in the process. Internet Policy Review. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://policyreview.info/articles/news/facebook-shuts-gate-after-horse-has-bolted-and-hurts-real-research-process/786.
  6. Cadwalladr, C. (2017, May 7). The great British Brexit robbery: How our democracy was hijacked. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy.
  7. Casas-Cortes, M., Cobarrubias, S., Heller, C., & Pezzani, L. (2017). Clashing cartographies, migrating maps: The politics of mobility at the external borders of E.U.rope. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, F. L. (2018). Desire as a theory for migration studies: Temporality, assemblage and becoming in the narratives of migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 964–980.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collyer, M. (2010). Stranded migrants and the fragmented journey. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(3), 273–293.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feq026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coutin, S. B. (2005). Being en route. American Anthropologist, 107(2), 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.2.195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De León, J. (2010). The undocumented migration project. Retrieved October 28, 2018, from http://undocumentedmigrationproject.com/home/about/.
  12. De León, J. (2015). The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EFFISEC (Efficient Integrated SeCurity Checkpoints). (2013). EFFISEC website. Retrieved February 27, 2019, from http://www.effisec.reading.ac.uk/project.htm.
  14. El-Enany, N. (2019). (B)ordering Britain. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/bordering-britain-9781509917792/.
  15. Europe’s migration crisis. (2016, January 5). Reuters website. Retrieved March 5, 2019, from http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/15/migrants/index.html.
  16. Forensic Architecture (Ed.). (2014). Forensis: The architecture of public truth. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  17. Garelli, G., & Tazzioli, M. (2018). The humanitarian war against migrant smugglers at sea. Antipode, 50(3), 685–703.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillespie, M., Ampofo, L., Cheesman, M., Faith, B., Iliadou, E., Osseiran, S., et al. (2016). Mapping refugee media journeys: Smartphones and social media networks. London: The Open University/France Médias Monde.Google Scholar
  19. Gillespie, M., Osseiran, S., & Cheesman, M. (2018). Syrian refugees and the digital passage to Europe: Smartphone infrastructures and affordances. Social Media + Society, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  20. Griffiths, M. B. E. (2014). Out of time: The temporal uncertainties of refused asylum seekers and immigration detainees. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1991–2009.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.907737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grosz, E. (2005). Time travels: Feminism, nature, power (Annotated ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hage, G. (2009). Waiting out the crisis: On stuckedness and governmentality. In G. Hage (Ed.), Waiting (pp. 97–106). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 3, 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hassan, A., & Biörklund, L. (2016). The journey to dreamland never ends: A refugee’s journey from Somalia to Sweden. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(2), 116–136.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdw007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hatton, J. (2018). MARS attacks!—A cautionary tale from the UK on the relation between migration and refugee studies (MARS) and migration control. Movements. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, 4(1), 103–129.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, C., Pezzani, L., & SITU Research. (2012). The left-to-die boat. Retrieved November 2, 2018, from https://www.forensic-architecture.org/case/left-die-boat/.
  27. Holmes, B. (2006). Counter cartographies. In J. Abrams & P. Hall (Eds.), Else/where: Mapping new cartographies of networks and territories. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Design Institute.Google Scholar
  28. iBorderCtrl. (2016). iBorderCtrl website. Retrieved November 4, 2018, from https://www.iborderctrl.eu/.
  29. Icli, T. G., Sever, H., & Sever, M. (2015). A survey study on the profile of human smugglers in Turkey. Advances in Applied Sociology, 5, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan, C. (2006). Precision targets: GPS and the militarization of U.S. consumer identity. American Quarterly, 58(3), 693–714.  https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khalili, B. (2008). The mapping journey project [Video Installation]. Retrieved from http://www.bouchrakhalili.com/the-mapping-journey-project/.
  32. Khosravi, S. (2014). Waiting. In B. Anderson & M. Keith (Eds.), Migration: The COMPAS anthology. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.Google Scholar
  33. Khosravi, S. (2018, December). Stolen time. Radical Philosophy, 2(3). Retrieved from https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/stolen-time.
  34. Kyriazanos, D. (2018). robusT Risk basEd Screening and alert System for PASSengers and luggage. Tresspass website. Retrieved February 27, 2019, from https://www.tresspass.eu/.
  35. Lanchester, J. (2017, August 17). You are the product. London Review of Books, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
  36. Latonero, M., & Kift, P. (2018). On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media + Society, 4(1).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764432.
  37. Macías-Rojas, P. (2018). The prison and the border: An ethnography of shifting border security logics. Qualitative Sociology, 41(2), 221–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-018-9382-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mainwaring, Ċ., & Brigden, N. (2016). Beyond the border: Clandestine migration journeys. Geopolitics, 21(2), 243–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1165575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2013). Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MobilePass. (2014). MobilePass, a secure, modular and distributed mobile border control solution for European land border crossing. Retrieved February 27, 2019, from http://mobilepass-project.eu/.
  41. Petrescu, D. (2007). The indeterminate mapping of the common. Field, 1(1), 88–96.Google Scholar
  42. Pezzani, L., & Heller, C. (2013). A disobedient gaze: Strategic interventions in the knowledge(s) of maritime borders. Postcolonial Studies, 16(3), 289–298.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2013.850047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Priedhorsky, R., Culotta, A., & Del Valle, S. Y. (2014). Inferring the origin locations of Tweets with quantitative confidence. In CSCW: Proceedings of the conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 1523–1536).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531607.
  44. Russia ‘meddled in all big social media’. (2018, December 17). BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-46590890.
  45. Schapendonk, J. (2012). Turbulent trajectories: African migrants on their way to the European Union. Societies, 2(2), 27–41.  https://doi.org/10.3390/soc2020027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schuurman, N., & Pratt, G. (2002). Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place & Culture, 9(3), 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaffer, M., Ferrato, G., & Jinnah, Z. (2018). Routes, locations, and social imaginary: A comparative study of the on-going production of geographies in Somali forced migration. African Geographical Review, 37(2), 159–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2017.1354308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharma, N. K., Ghosh, J., Benevenuto, F., Ganguly, N., & Gummadi, K. (2012). Inferring who-is-who in the twitter social network. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 42(4), 533–538.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2377677.2377782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shubin, S. (2015). Migration timespaces: A Heideggerian approach to understanding the mobile being of eastern Europeans in Scotland. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(3), 350–361.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tazzioli, M. (2014). Spaces of governmentality: Autonomous migration and the Arab uprisings. London & New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
  51. van Houtum, H. (2012). Remapping borders. In T. M. Wilson & H. Donnan (Eds.), A companion to border studies (pp. 404–418). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  52. Venturini, T., & Rogers, R. (2019). ‘API-based research’ or how can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Cambridge Analytica affair. Digital Journalism. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02003925.
  53. Walters, J. (2017, September 14). What is Daca and who are the Dreamers? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/sep/04/donald-trump-what-is-daca-dreamers.
  54. Weizman, E. (2014). Introduction: Forensis. In F. Architecture (Ed.), Forensis: The architecture of public truth (pp. 9–32). Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  55. Windrush scandal. (2019). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windrush_scandal&oldid=885962573.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations