Skip to main content

Gender Diversity in Nomination Committee: A Way to Promote Gender Balance on Board?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gender Studies, Entrepreneurship and Human Capital (IPAZIA 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 651 Accesses

Abstract

The promotion of gender balance within corporate boards is considered one of the tools to support the gender diversity in the society as a whole. This paper would be a first step of a research project about the future of women on boards when the Italian L.120/2011, which imposes gender quotas in corporate governance bodies, will expire. In particular, the analysis focuses on the current board composition of the Italian-listed companies, with a particular focus on the nomination committee. The main tasks of this committee are the assessment of the board composition and the proposal of candidates for board positions; therefore, it could have an important role in the promotion of more balanced board with regard to gender in the absence of binding rules. This paper aims first to fill the existing gap in the literature about the role of nomination committee for gender-balanced boards, also with regard to different industries. Furthermore, it is a starting point for future researches extended to other countries, with potential practical implications, suggesting regulators to focus their attention on committees’ composition, not only with regard to number and status of independence but also with regard to gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The actual chapter represents the evolution and refers for some contents to the following published chapter: Gennari, F. (2019) “European Women on Boards and Corporate Sustainability” in Paoloni, P. and Lombardi, R. (Eds), Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics. 4th IPAZIA Workshop on Gender Issues 2018. Springer: Switzerland.

  2. 2.

    Corporate Governance Code of Borsa Italiana, at Article 5, says: ‘the Board of Directors shall establish among its members a committee to propose candidates for appointment to the position of director, made up, for the majority, of independent directors’. The nomination committee institution is historically born in outsider systems, characterized by a high degree of fragmentation of the stockholder structure, for the purpose of ensuring an adequate level of independence of the directors with respect to the management.

  3. 3.

    CONSOB: Italian Companies and Exchange Commission is the authority responsible for regulating the Italian securities market.

References

  • Adams, R.B. and Ferreira, D. (2009) “Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, 94:291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. S., Takeda, C. and Thomas, S. (1999) “Bank loan loss provisions: A reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allegrini, M. and Greco, G. (2013) Journal of Management and Governance, 17: 187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9168-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K.O. and Chizema, A. (2015) “Remuneration committee and corporate failure”, Corporate Governance, 15(5):623–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1991) “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, D. and Frye, M. (2011) “Does regulation substitute or complement governance?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 736–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Barka, H. and Legendre, F. (2017) Journal of Management and Governance, 21: 737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9356-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R.A. and Threadgill, V.H. (2010) “Women Directors and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies. 15(2):15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. (1978), Interpersonal Attraction, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilimoria, D. and Piderit, S.K. (1994) “Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1453–1477

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J.R., Cornett, M.M. and Tehranian, H. (2002) “Boards of directors, ownership and regulation”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1973–1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrenbergs, J., Vieira, R. and Georgakopoulos, G. (2017) “Remuneration Committees’ Gender Composition as a Determinant of Executive Board Compensation Structure”, International Business Research, 10(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno G.S.F., Ciavarella A. and Linciano N. (2018) Boardroom gender diversity and performance of listed companies in Italy, 87, Consob

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B.K. and Hegarty, H.W. (1999) “Some determinants of student corporate social responsibility”, Business and Society, 38:188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm, New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron, K. and Post, C. (2016) “Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analysis”, Corp. Gov., 24(4):428–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D., Simkins, B. and Simpson, W. (2003) “Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value”, Financial Review, 38:33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarella, A. (2017) “Board diversity and firm performance across Europe”, Research Department of Consob. Available at: http://www.consob.it/documents/46180/46181/qdf85.pdf/0f2ee77d-4f3a-420b-b7cd-36f227d0d74c Accessed 11/02/19

  • Clark, C., De Martinis, M. and Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2007) “Audit quality attributes of European Union supreme audit institutions”, European Business Review, 19(1): 40–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. and Glass, C. (2017) “Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility?”, Human Relations, 71(7): 897–, 924

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, G. and Singh, S. (2016) “Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: A Literature Review”, Journal of IMS Group 13(1), pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000) “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhardt, N.L. and Werbel, J.D., (2003) “Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance”, Corporate Governance, 11(2):102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • EY (2013) Diversity drives diversity, Ernst & Young LLP, Available at: https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Diversity-drives-diversity/%24FILE/EY-Diversity-drives-diversity.pdf Accessed 11/02/2019

  • Fama, E.F. (1980) “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm”, The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. (1999), “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups”, Academy of Management Review 24(3): 489–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, F. (2016) “Women on boards and corporate social responsibility”, Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 12(4):101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, F. (2018) “Gender Balance on Boards and Corporate Sustainability for the 2030 Agenda”, African Journal of Business Management, 12(11):343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennari, F. (2019) “European Women on Boards and Corporate Sustainability” in Paoloni, P. and Lombardi, R. (Eds), Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics. 4th IPAZIA Workshop on Gender Issues 2018. Springer: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1991) “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, L. and Yang, R. (2014) “Does Industry Regulation Matter? New Evidence on Audit Committees and Earnings Management”, J Bus Ethics, 123:573–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidrick & Struggles International (2014). “Towards dynamic governance” Available at http://www.heidrick.com/~/media/Publications%20and%20Reports/European-Corporate-Governance-Report-2014-Towards-Dynamic-Governance.pdf Accessed 15/01/18

  • Huse, M., Nielsen, S.T., Hagen, I.M. (2009) “Women and employee-elected board members, and their contributions to board control tasks”, Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (4), pp. 581–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, E., Yang, D., Jung, H. and Hong, K. (2016) “Women on Boards and Corporate Social Responsibility”, Sustainability, 8, 300.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2019), Women in business and management: The Business Case for Change. International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo, A.L.G., Méndez, C.F. and García, R.A. (2018) “Gender Diversity on Boards of Directors and Remuneration Committees: The Influence on Listed Companies in Spain”, Front Psychol., 9: 1351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W. (1976) “Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek, S. and Nyuur, R. (2016) “Review of the literature on board committees: taking stock and looking ahead”, International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 11(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallamu, B.S. (2016) “Nomination Committee Attributes and Firm Performance: Evidence from Finance Companies in Malaysia”, Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 3(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanapathippillai, S., Johl, S.K. and Wines, G. (2016) “Remuneration committee effectiveness and narrative remuneration disclosure”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40: 384–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad A.M., Kroner V. and Erkut S. (2008) “Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 145–164,

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao L., Luob, L. and Tang Q. (2015) “Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure”, The British Accounting Review, 47(4): 409–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Macus, M. (2008) “Corporate Governance Development Levels of Boards”, International Studies of Management & Organization, 38(3), 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar, J.W., Powers, T.L. and Queisser, T. (2003) “Corporate and Individual Influences on Managers’ Social Orientation”, Journal of Business Ethics 46, pp 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company (2013) “Gender diversity in top management: Moving corporate culture, moving boundaries” Available at https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Women%20matter/Addressing%20unconscious%20bias/WomenMatter%202013%20Report%20(8).ashx Accessed 08/07/19.

  • McKinsey Global Institute (2019) “The Future of Women at Work. Transitions in the age of automation”, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/the-future-of-women-at-work-transitions-in-the-age-of-automation. Accessed 14/06/19

  • OECD (2012) Board Nomination and Election, Directorate for Financial and Enteprise Affairs – Corporate Governance Committee, Peer review 4

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015), G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar, R., Hansen, E. and Anderson, R. (2010) “Students’ perceptions regarding CSR success of the US forest products industry”, Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1):18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoloni, P. and Lombardi, R. (2017) “Exploring the connection between relational capital and female entrepreneurs”, African Journal of Business Management, 11(24):740–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1992), “On Studying Managerial Elites”, Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Pletzer, J.L., Nikolova, R., Kedzior, K.K. and Voelpel, S.C. (2015) “Does Gender Matter? Female Representation on Corporate Boards and Firm Financial Performance – A Meta-Analysis” PLOS, 10(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., Rahman, N. and Rubow, E. (2011) “Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility”, Business & Society, 50(1):189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez S.A. (2003). “A flaw in the Sarbanes-Oxley reform: can diversity in the boardroom quell corporate corruption?” St John’s Law Review. 77: 838–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. and Tilt C. (2016) “Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making”, Journal of Business Ethics 138, pp. 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S., Greve, P. and Hu, Y. (2006) “The Determinants and Effects of Board Nomination Committees”, J Manage Governance, 10: 119

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell Reynolds Associates (2018). Global and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance for 2018. Available at: www.russellreynolds.com. Accessed 21/06/19.

  • Shrader, C.B., Blackburn, V.B. and Iles, P. (1997) “Women in Management and Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of management Issues, 9:355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Smith, V. and Verner, M. (2006) “Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7):569–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, P. and Taylor, B. (2001) Boards at Work: How Directors View their Roles and Responsibilities Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Liu, G. and Lan, G. (2011) J Bus Ethics, 99: 369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0657-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruvadi, S. and Huang, H.W. (2011) “Audit committee gender differences and earnings management”, Gender in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 26 Issue: 7, pp. 483–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley, S. and Zaman, M. (2004) Journal of Management and Governance 8: 305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-004-1110-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Global Compact (2015) Guide to Corporate Sustainability, UNGC: NY

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Women (2018). Turning promises into actions: gender equality in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Available at: www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications

  • Uribe-Bohorquez, M.V., Martínez-Ferrero, J. and García-Sánchez, I.M. (2018) “Women on boards and efficiency in a business-orientated environment”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vafeas N. (1999), “The Nature of Board Nominating Committees and Their Role in Corporate Governance”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26(1–2): 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Velte, P. (2018) “Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters’ readability in the audit report? UK evidence”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5): 748–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. (2004) “An examination of socially responsible firms’ board structure”, Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3):255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zraiq M.A.A., Fadzil, F.H.B. (2018) “The impact of nomination and remuneration committee on corporate financial performance”, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(3)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Gennari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gennari, F., Fornasari, T. (2020). Gender Diversity in Nomination Committee: A Way to Promote Gender Balance on Board?. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Gender Studies, Entrepreneurship and Human Capital. IPAZIA 2019. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46874-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics