Skip to main content

Hamlet and Black Earth Rising: Returns to the Roots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shakespeare’s Serial Returns in Complex TV

Part of the book series: Reproducing Shakespeare ((RESH))

  • 250 Accesses

Abstract

Black Earth Rising includes only one brief reference to Hamlet, albeit in a decisive moment concerned with unearthing the covered grave of forgotten parents whom the protagonist has only just begun to remember. It is thus a highly self-reflexive moment in which the link to a hitherto neglected antecedent is introduced, a link that invites viewers to reconsider the action of Black Earth Rising in the light of Hamlet. This chapter discusses how the series translocates Hamlet’s detection of a hidden political crime to post-genocide Rwanda in its international relations. It focuses on the tension between remembrance, revenge, and reconciliation, on the ghostly apparitions of the dead father, on the different endings of the revenge tragedy and the series, and on the meta-adaptational plant imagery in Black Earth Rising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As Alexandre Dauge-Roth points out, all cinematic representations of the Rwandan genocide so far have also been addressed mainly to Western audiences (2010, 170).

  2. 2.

    Recently, de Grazia has emphasised the importance of (the loss of) the realm for Hamlet, too. De Grazia’s phrasing is interesting with regard to the fabric metaphor of Black Earth Rising: “the importance of the realm to Hamlet […] does more than give substance to his state of dejection at the play’s start: it knits him into the fabric of the play. The play opens with threatened invasion and ends in military occupation. Framed by territorial conflict, it stages one contest over land after another”; “The language of the play itself upholds the attachment of persons to land, human to humus. Flesh and earth repeatedly coalesce through overlaps of sound and sense” (2007, 2; 3).

  3. 3.

    In the Folio edition, Hamlet explicitly acknowledges this correspondence before the catastrophic finale: “But I am very sorry, good Horatio, / That to Laertes I forgot myself, / For by the image of my cause I see / The portraiture of his” (F 5.2.75—78; Appendix I, 502; see Levin 2002, 222).

  4. 4.

    As de Grazia has pointed out in her reading of Hamlet, “[e]very burial service performed in compliance with Elizabeth’s Book of Common Prayer served as a reminder of this elemental affinity: ‘Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust,’ the priest is instructed to say after the body has been laid in the earth and as earth is cast upon it. So, too, the formulaic wording of last wills and testaments, after commending the soul to God, consigned the body to ‘the earth whereof it is made” (2007, 32).

  5. 5.

    As Robert Stockhammer’s study Ruanda: Über einen anderen Genozid schreiben has shown, the Rwandan genocide is habitually analysed as the ‘other’ genocide with reference to the Holocaust (2005, 66). In an article on the fate of tragic art in modernity, the philosopher Jay Bernstein has argued that social agreements on what counts as absolute evil provide a moral compass that had previously been provided by tragedy. In the course of his argument, he comments on the paradox that emerges when a unique historical event like the Holocaust is used as a point of reference for other unique events: “[b]y becoming exemplary, the Holocaust hence becomes a bridging metaphor for understanding major historical events—the extermination of the Herero people, the evil of Stalin’s gulags, the Armenian, Cambodian, and Rwandan genocides, and so on. The Holocaust’s presumed uniqueness is, precisely, what engenders new terms of moral comparability, and so its nonuniqueness” (2009, 90).

  6. 6.

    Stockhammer notes that Levi is the most frequently quoted author in texts about the Rwandan genocide that refer to the Holocaust (2005, 163).

  7. 7.

    Like Hamlet, Ophelia suffers from the loss of her father, whose death is obscured, and, like Hamlet, she either acts mad in order to communicate truths she otherwise cannot utter or has actually lost her mind. The play also emphasises the gendered differences in their response to loss, however, including Hamlet’s turn to revenge and Ophelia’s self-harm (Aronson-Lehavi 2014, 72; Tassi 2011, 90).

  8. 8.

    See Steward (2008, 177–78) on the relevance of sharing drinks as a sign of establishing consensus and the fear of poisoned drinks in the aftermath of the genocide in Rwanda.

  9. 9.

    The fact that viewers get closer to the apparition than Kate herself can be seen as a remediation of the Globe’s theatrical situation, where “[h]aving been lowered via the trap door, the actor playing the Ghost would be standing literally on the same level as the groundlings. His descent leaves him about five feet below the stage, with only thin panels separating him from the lowest members of the audience” (de Grazia 2007, 42).

    In both Hamlet and Black Earth Rising the corpse’s apparition literalises the racial categorisation of the father. Whereas the half-decayed hand of the series’ revenant is deep black, in Hamlet, the father’s whiteness is exaggerated as part of the play’s “association of whiteness and vulnerability” (Erickson 2002, 210): “there is the metamorphosis of the former ‘fair and warlike form’ (1.1.47) into the ‘very pale’ countenance of his current state (1.2.230–33). This paleness, however, is soon further transformed by the Ghost’s graphic disclosure of the physical process of his death. The action of the ‘leprous distilment’ results in a whitening that is both internal—‘And with a sudden vigour it doth posset / And curd, like eager droppings into milk, / The thin and wholesome blood’—and external—‘And a most instant tetter barked about, / Most lazar-like, with vile and loathsome crust, / All my smooth body’ (1.5.64–73)” (Erickson 2002, 210).

  10. 10.

    In its emphasis on the continuous possibility of an innovative blossoming in new plots, such an adaptation strategy differs from Cartelli’s idea that “reenactments could be said to alter their own reproductive DNA in ways that block or discourage replication” (2019, 5).

References

Primary Sources

  • A Sunday in Kigali. 2006. Dir. Robert Favreau. Equinoxe Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 2000. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall. Ed. Michael Kiernan. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Earth Rising. 2018–2019. Drama Republic / BBC Studios / Eight Rooks Production.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, John and William Davenant. 1970. “The Tempest, or the Enchanted Island.” Plays: The Tempest. Tyrannick Love. An Evening’s Love. The Works of John Dryden. Vol. 10. Berkeley: U of California P. 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneva Bible, The Annotated New Testament. 1989. Ed. Gerald T. Sheppard. Cleveland: The Pilgrim Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet. 1921. Dir. Asta Nielsen. Art-Film / Asta-Film.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet. 2000. Dir. Michael Almereyda. Buena Vista Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet. 2016. Dir. Simon Godwin. The Royal Shakespeare Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotel Rwanda. 2004. Dir. Terry George. Lionsgate Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Primo. 1986. The Drowned and the Saved. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othello. 2015. Dir. Iqbal Khan and Robin Lough. The Royal Shakespeare Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. 2016. Hamlet: The Arden Shakespeare. Third Series. Ed. Ann Thompson and Neil Taylor. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Honourable Woman. 2014. BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, Elie. 1982. The Accident. Trans. Anne Borchardt. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Abraham, Nicolas and Maria Torok. 1994. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. Ed. and trans. Nicholas T. Rand. Chicago: U of Chicago P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Thomas P. 2006. Performing Early Modern Trauma from Shakespeare to Milton. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson-Lehavi, Sharon. 2014. “The Excess of Violence.” Hamlet-Handbuch. Ed. Peter W. Marx. Stuttgart: Metzler. 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Article 9. Rwanda’s Constitution of 2003 with Amendments through 2015. Constitute Project 12 Aug 2019. <https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Rwanda_2015.pdf?lang=en>. Accessed 03 Feb 2020.

  • Assmann, Aleida. 1999. “And we had the trick to see’t: Geheimnis und Neugierde in Shakespeares Hamlet.” Schleier und Schwelle: Geheimnis und Neugierde. Ed. Aleida Assmann and Jan Assmann. München: Fink. 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. M. 2009. “Tragedy.” The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature. Ed. Richard Eldridge. Oxford: Oxford UP. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, Laura. 2009. “Shakespeare in the Bush.” Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology. 13th ed. Ed. James Spradley and David W. McCurry. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall. 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, Dympna. 2006. “Do Characters Have Souls?” Shakespeare Studies 34: 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Hazel. 2013. Britain’s Hidden Role in the Rwandan Genocide: The Cat’s Paw. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Marvin. 2008. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelli, Thomas. 2019. Reenacting Shakespeare in the Shakespeare Aftermath: The Intermedial Turn and Turn to Embodiment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, Stanley. 1987. Disowning Knowledge in Seven Plays of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlwood, Catherine. 2016. “‘II resto [non] è silenzio’: The Friendship of Texts between Hamlet and Se questo.” Interpreting Primo Levi: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Ed. Minna Vuohelainen and Arthur Chapman. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, Malcome. 2015. “Revenge is Not an Option in Rwanda: Interview with Kiki about Hamlet in Rwanda.” vimeo. <https://vimeo.com/119006498>. Accessed 10 Dec 2019.

  • Cressy, David. 1997. Birth, Marriage, and Death: Ritual, Religion, and the Life-Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Oxford UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dauge-Roth, Alexandre. 2010. Writing and Filming the Genocide of the Tutsi in Rwanda: Dismembering and Remembering Traumatic History. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grazia, Margareta. 2007. Hamlet without Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Magnus Bernd and Stephen Cullenberg. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, Tobias. 2006. Performances of Mourning in Shakespearean Theatre and Early Modern Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Peter. 2002. “Can We Talk About Race in Hamlet?” Hamlet: New Critical Essays. Ed. Arthur F. Kinney. New York: Routledge. 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Ellen S. 1982. Legacy of Night: The Literary Universe of Elie Wiesel. Albany: State U of New York P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, Marjorie. 1987. Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality. New York: Methuen. 124–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, René. 1981. Violence and the Sacred. Trans. Patrick Gregory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen. 2001. Hamlet in Purgatory. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Charles L. 2007. Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, David. 2007. Shakespeare’s Entrails: Belief, Scepticism and the Interior of the Body. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holleran, James V. 1989. “Maimed Funeral Rites in Hamlet.” English Literary Renaissance 19.1: 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Tony. 2007. Women as Hamlet: Performance and Interpretation in Theatre, Film and Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, Ranjana. 2003. Dark Continents: Psychoanalysis and Colonialism. Durham: Duke UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kottman, Paul A. 2008. A Politics of the Scene. Stanford: Stanford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Douglas. 2014. “Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value.” Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation. Ed. Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, René. 2008. “The Politics of Memory in Post-Genocide Rwanda.” After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond. Ed. Phil Clark and Zachary D. Kaufman. London: Hurst. 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Richard. 2002. “Hamlet, Laertes, and the Dramatic Functions of Foils.” Hamlet: New Critical Essays. Ed. Arthur F. Kinney. Routledge: New York. 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, Eric S. 2019. Reading Shakespeare in the Movies: Non-Adaptations and Their Meaning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, Mahmood. 2001. When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, Tom. 2012. Problem Fathers in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Cambridge, Cambridge UP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menzer, Paul. 2012. “Ophelia’s Wake.” The Afterlife of Ophelia. Ed. Kaara L. Peterson and Deanne Williams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney, Steven. 2015. The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: The U of Chicago P.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Heiner. 2001. “Shakespeare a Difference.” A Heiner Müller Reader. Ed. Carl Weber. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, Michael. 1997. Issues of Death: Mortality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 216–251.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostheimer, Michael. 2013. Ungebetene Hinterlassenschaften: Zur literarischen Imagination über das familiäre Nachleben des Nationalsozialismus. Goettingen: V&R Unipress.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plastow, Jane. 2020. “The Politics of African Shakespeare.” The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation. Ed. Christy Desmet, Sujata Iyengar, and Miriam Jacobson. London: Routledge. 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashkin, Esther. 1992. “For a New Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism: The Works of Abraham and Torok.” Family Secrets and the Psychoanalysis of Narrative. Ed. Esther Rashkin. Princeton: Princeton UP. 13–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisz, Matthew. 2015. “Surprising Responses to Hamlet Africa Tour.” THE 21 May. <https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/surprising-responses-to-hamlet-africa-tour/2020284.article>. Accessed 19 Dec 2019.

  • Rowe, Katherine. 2003. “‘Remember me’: Technologies of Memory in Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet.” Shakespeare, the Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, Television, and DVD. Ed. Richard Burt and Lynda Boose. New York: Routledge. 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showalter, Elaine. 1985. “Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism.” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, Peter, Roger Chartier, J. Franklin Mowery, and Heather Wolfe. 2004. “Hamlet’s Tables and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England.” Shakespeare Quarterly 55.4: 379–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, John. 2008. “Only Healing Heals: Concepts and Methods of Psycho-Social Healing in Post-Genocide Rwanda.” After Genocide: Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Reconciliation in Rwanda and Beyond. Ed. Phil Clark and Zachary Kaufman. London: Hurst. 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, Robert. 2005. Ruanda: Über einen anderen Genozid schreiben. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tassi, Marguerite A. 2011. Women and Revenge in Shakespeare: Gender, Genre, and Ethics. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Keith. 1973. Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies of Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Harriet. 2016. Brutus and Other Heroines: Playing Shakespeare’s Roles for Women. London: Nick Hern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Robert N. 1994. The Rest is Silence: Death and Annihilation in the English Renaissance. Berkeley: U of California P.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, Sigrid. 1999. “Télescopage im Unbewussten: Zum Verhältnis von Trauma, Geschichtsbegriff und Literatur.” Trauma: Zwischen Psychoanalyse und kulturellem Deutungsmuster. Ed. Elisabeth Bronfen, Birgit R. Erdle, and Sigrid Weigel. Köln: Böhlau. 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Jane. 1999. “The Saying of Tsikinya-Chaka: Shakespeare in South Africa.” Africa: Rivista trimestrale di studi e documentazione dell’Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente 54.2: 193–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Wald .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wald, C. (2020). Hamlet and Black Earth Rising: Returns to the Roots. In: Shakespeare’s Serial Returns in Complex TV . Reproducing Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46851-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics