Abstract
In collapse models, the induced narrowing of the wavefunction typically leads to an increase in energy. For realistic non-relativistic models, the parameters of the model can be set such that the energy increase is small enough to be within experimental bounds. However, for relativistic versions of collapse models the energy increase is divergent. Here we show how to regulate this divergent behaviour by formulating a collapse model on a discrete Lorentzian spacetime. The result is a relativistic collapse model with finite energy production. This energy increase can be made sufficiently small with a reasonable choice for the discreteness scale of spacetime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Weak measurements such as this can be brought about by the use of a projective measurement on an auxiliary quantum system which interacts with the system of interest.
- 2.
This can be motivated by considering a one-dimensional space of length L as a regular array of N points. The kronecker delta function can be written
$$\begin{aligned} \delta _{nm} = \frac{1}{N}\sum _{k = 1}^Ne^{2\pi i \frac{k}{N}(n-m)}, \end{aligned}$$(16)and so if we define \(x_n = Ln/N\) and \(p_k = 2\pi k/L\) so that \(\Delta x = a = L/N\), and \(\Delta p = 2\pi /L\), then
$$\begin{aligned} a^{-1}\delta _{nm} = \frac{1}{2\pi }\sum _{k=1}^N \Delta p e^{ip_k(x_n-x_m)}. \end{aligned}$$(17)This is the discretised version of the Dirac delta function \(\delta (x_n-x_m)\) in one dimension. Setting \(m=n\) results in \(\delta (x = 0)\sim a^{-1}\). We also note that, by the same argument \(\delta (p = 0) \sim L/(2\pi )\).
- 3.
I am unaware of any argument or experimental result ruling out such a large discreteness scale.
References
A. Bassi and G. Ghirardi, Physics Reports 379, 257 (2003).
A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 471 (2013).
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Physical Review D 34, 470 (1986).
P. Pearle, Physical Review A 39, 2277 (1989).
G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini, Physical Review A 42, 78 (1990).
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
J. S. Bell, John S. Bell on the foundations of quantum mechanics , 172 (2001).
D. J. Bedingham, Foundations of Physics 41, 686 (2011).
D. Bedingham, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 306 (IOP Publishing, 2011) p. 012034.
D. Bedingham, S. K. Modak, and D. Sudarsky, Phys. Rev. D 94, 045009 (2016).
G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle, Foundations of Physics 20, 1271 (1990).
L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. D. Sorkin, Physical review letters 59, 521 (1987).
S. Surya, “The causal set approach to quantum gravity,” arXiv:1903.11544 [gr-qc] (2019).
S. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 180401 (2009).
R. D. Sorkin, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 14, 1740007- 3127 (2017), arXiv:1703.00610 [gr-qc].
S. Johnston, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 202001 (2008).
W. Feldmann and R. Tumulka, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45, 065304 (2012).
D. Bedingham, “Collapse models and spacetime symmetries,” in Collapse of the Wave Function: Models, Ontology, Origin, and Implications (Cambridge University Press, 2018) pp. 74–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bedingham, D.J. (2021). Collapse Models, Relativity, and Discrete Spacetime. In: Allori, V., Bassi, A., Dürr, D., Zanghi, N. (eds) Do Wave Functions Jump? . Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46777-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46777-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46776-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46777-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)