Skip to main content

Collapse Models, Relativity, and Discrete Spacetime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Do Wave Functions Jump?

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 198))

Abstract

In collapse models, the induced narrowing of the wavefunction typically leads to an increase in energy. For realistic non-relativistic models, the parameters of the model can be set such that the energy increase is small enough to be within experimental bounds. However, for relativistic versions of collapse models the energy increase is divergent. Here we show how to regulate this divergent behaviour by formulating a collapse model on a discrete Lorentzian spacetime. The result is a relativistic collapse model with finite energy production. This energy increase can be made sufficiently small with a reasonable choice for the discreteness scale of spacetime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Weak measurements such as this can be brought about by the use of a projective measurement on an auxiliary quantum system which interacts with the system of interest.

  2. 2.

    This can be motivated by considering a one-dimensional space of length L as a regular array of N points. The kronecker delta function can be written

    $$\begin{aligned} \delta _{nm} = \frac{1}{N}\sum _{k = 1}^Ne^{2\pi i \frac{k}{N}(n-m)}, \end{aligned}$$
    (16)

    and so if we define \(x_n = Ln/N\) and \(p_k = 2\pi k/L\) so that \(\Delta x = a = L/N\), and \(\Delta p = 2\pi /L\), then

    $$\begin{aligned} a^{-1}\delta _{nm} = \frac{1}{2\pi }\sum _{k=1}^N \Delta p e^{ip_k(x_n-x_m)}. \end{aligned}$$
    (17)

    This is the discretised version of the Dirac delta function \(\delta (x_n-x_m)\) in one dimension. Setting \(m=n\) results in \(\delta (x = 0)\sim a^{-1}\). We also note that, by the same argument \(\delta (p = 0) \sim L/(2\pi )\).

  3. 3.

    I am unaware of any argument or experimental result ruling out such a large discreteness scale.

References

  1. A. Bassi and G. Ghirardi, Physics Reports 379, 257 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bassi, K. Lochan, S. Satin, T. P. Singh, and H. Ulbricht, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 471 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Physical Review D 34, 470 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Pearle, Physical Review A 39, 2277 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini, Physical Review A 42, 78 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Bell, John S. Bell on the foundations of quantum mechanics , 172 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. J. Bedingham, Foundations of Physics 41, 686 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Bedingham, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 306 (IOP Publishing, 2011) p. 012034.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Bedingham, S. K. Modak, and D. Sudarsky, Phys. Rev. D 94, 045009 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, and P. Pearle, Foundations of Physics 20, 1271 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. D. Sorkin, Physical review letters 59, 521 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Surya, “The causal set approach to quantum gravity,” arXiv:1903.11544 [gr-qc] (2019).

  14. S. Johnston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 180401 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. D. Sorkin, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 14, 1740007- 3127 (2017), arXiv:1703.00610 [gr-qc].

  16. S. Johnston, Classical and Quantum Gravity 25, 202001 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Feldmann and R. Tumulka, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45, 065304 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Bedingham, “Collapse models and spacetime symmetries,” in Collapse of the Wave Function: Models, Ontology, Origin, and Implications (Cambridge University Press, 2018) pp. 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Bedingham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bedingham, D.J. (2021). Collapse Models, Relativity, and Discrete Spacetime. In: Allori, V., Bassi, A., Dürr, D., Zanghi, N. (eds) Do Wave Functions Jump? . Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46777-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics