Skip to main content

Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Emergent Order in Growth and Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complexity in Landscape Ecology

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 22))

Abstract

The patterns we see in the growth of a plant or the behaviour of animals can appear very complex, but there are often simple rules that underlie what we see. Systems of rules, called L-systems can capture the organisation of branching patterns and other features of growing plants. Simple rules of behaviour can explain many features of animal behaviour; multi-agent simulations use these rules to model community organisation and interaction with the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The process often involves using several different rules in parallel, not just one at a time.

  2. 2.

    This simple drawing procedure uses turtle graphics, which we look at later in the chapter.

  3. 3.

    Cellular automata, which we discuss in Chap. 3, have context-sensitive rules.

  4. 4.

    This process, known as stigmergy, involves positive feedback (see Sect. 5.1).

  5. 5.

    We will discuss this kind of model, which is known as a cellular automaton, in the next chapter.

References

  1. Anselme P, Güntürkün O (2019) How foraging works: uncertainty magnifies food-seeking motivation. Behav Brain Sci 42(e35):1–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartumeus F, Campos D, Ryu WS, Lloret-Cabot R, Méndez V, Catalan J (2016) Foraging success under uncertainty: search tradeoffs and optimal space use. Ecol Lett 19(11):1299–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bode NW, Wood AJ, Franks DW (2011) The impact of social networks on animal collective motion. Anim Behav 82(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles-Edwards DA, Doley D, Rimmington GM (1986) Modeling plant growth and development. Academic, North Ryde

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chmait N, Dowe DL, Green DG, Li YF (2019) Simulating exploration versus exploitation in agent foraging under different environment uncertainties. Behav Brain Sci 42:e39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chmait N, Dowe DL, Li YF, Green DG, Insa-Cabrera J (2016) Factors of collective intelligence: How smart are agent collectives? Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence IOS Press, Amsterdam, p 542–550

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunbar RIM (1998) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunbar RIM (2013) Primate social systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiorucci AS, Fankhauser C (2017) Plant strategies for enhancing access to sunlight. Curr Biol 27(17):931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernández-Orallo J, Dowe DL (2010) Measuring universal intelligence: towards an anytime intelligence test. Artif Intell 174(18):1508–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogeweg P, Hesper B (1983) The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumblebee colonies: a MIRROR model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12(4):271–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Larralde H, Trunfio P, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Weiss GH (1992) Territory covered by N diffusing particles. Nature 355(6359):423–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindenmayer A (1968) Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development. J Theor Biol 18(3):280–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehlhorn K, Newell BR, Todd PM, Lee MD, Morgan K, Braithwaite VA, Hausmann D, Fiedler K, Gonzalez C (2015) Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff: a synthesis of human and animal literatures. Decision 2(3):191–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Monk CT, Barbier M, Romanczuk P, Watson JR, Alós J, Nakayama S, Rubenstein DI, Levin SA, Arlinghaus R (2018) How ecology shapes exploitation: a framework to predict the behavioural response of human and animal foragers along exploration–exploitation trade-offs. Ecol Lett 21(6):779–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Papert S (1973) Uses of technology to enhance education. LOGO Memo No 8 MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pinter-Wollman N, Hobson EA, Smith JE, Edelman AJ, Shizuka D, de Silva S, Waters JS, Prager SD, Sasaki T, Wittemyer G, Fewell J, McDonald DB (2014) The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical conceptual and theoretical advances. Behav Ecol 25(2):242–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Poskanzer J (1991) Xantfarm – simple ant farm for X11. http://www.acme.com/software/xantfarm/ Accessed 27 Dec 2019

  19. Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A (1990) The algorithmic beauty of plants. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Quadros AL, Barros F, Blumstein DT, Meira VH, Nunes JAC (2019) Structural complexity but not territory sizes influences flight initiation distance in a damselfish. Mar Biol 166(5):65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comp Grap 21(4):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rimmington GM, Alagic M (2007) From Modeling foliage with L-systems to digital art. In: Bridges Donostia: mathematics, music, art, architecture, culture. Tarquin Publications, pp 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tan Y, Zheng ZY (2013) Research advance in swarm robotics. Def Technol 9(1):18–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tao Y, Börger L, Hastings A (2016) Dynamic range size analysis of territorial animals: an optimality approach. Am Nat 188(4):460–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Viswanathan GM, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Da Luz MGE, Raposo EP, Stanley HE (1999) Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401(6756):911–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Green, D.G., Klomp, N.I., Rimmington, G., Sadedin, S. (2020). Seeing the Wood for the Trees: Emergent Order in Growth and Behaviour. In: Complexity in Landscape Ecology. Landscape Series, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46773-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics