Abstract
Modern business environment can tolerate no failures, especially involving unscheduled shutdowns, environmental contamination, individual injuries, and human fatalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kletz T, Amyotte P (2019) What went wrong?: case histories of process plant disasters and how they could have been avoided. Butterworth-Heinemann
Kumar U (1998) Maintenance strategies for mechanized and automated mining systems: a reliability and risk analysis based approach. J Mines Met Fuels 46:343–347
Bevilacqua M, Braglia M (2000) The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 70:71–83
Chen LN, Toyoda J (1989) Maintenance scheduling based on two level hierarchical structure to equalize incremental risk. In: Conference papers power industry computer application conference (IEEE), pp 431–437
Inspection R-B (2000) Base resource document. API Publications 581
Chang M, Chang R, Shu C, Lin K (2005) Application of risk based inspection in refinery and processing piping. 18 397–402
Ridgway M (2001) Classifying medical devices according to their maintenance sensitivity: a practical, risk-based approach to PM program management. Biomed Instrum Technol 35:167–176
Lee C, Teo Y (2001) Det Norske Veritas RBI study for the ammonia storage plant. Fertil. Kaohsiung Ammon. Termin, ROC Taiwan
Khan FI, Haddara MM (2003) Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J Loss Prev Process Ind 16:561–573
Khan FI, Haddara M (2004) Risk-Based Maintenance (RBM): a new approach for process plant inspection and maintenance. Process Saf Prog 23:252–265
Khan FI (2001) Use maximum-credible accident scenarios for realistic and reliable risk assessment. Chem Eng Prog 97:56–64
Khan FI, Abbasi SA (1998) MAXCRED—A new software package for rapid risk assessment in chemical process industries. Environ Model Softw 14:11–25
Khan FI, Abbasi SA (2000) Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: a new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J Hazard Mater 75:1–27
Shafaghi A (1988) Structure modeling of process systems for risk and reliability analysis. Kandel, Avni, pp 45–64
Fadt P, Analysis T (1999) PROFAT: a user friendly system for probabilistic fault tree analysis. Process Saf Prog 18:42–49
Lees F (2012) Lees’ loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control. Elsevier
Rice WP (2007) Medical device risk based evaluation and maintenance using fault tree analysis
Jamshidi A, Abbasgholizadeh S, Ait-kadi D, Ruiz A (2015) A comprehensive fuzzy risk-based maintenance framework for prioritization of medical devices. Appl Soft Comput J 32:322–334
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bakri, A., Mohd Szali Januddi, MF. (2020). Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance. In: Systematic Industrial Maintenance to Boost the Quality Management Programs. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46586-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46586-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46585-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46586-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)