Skip to main content

Staging the ‘Reality’ of Dementia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dementia, Narrative and Performance
  • 237 Accesses

Abstract

Gibson examines the connection between words, stories, identity, and the materialisation of reality in ‘theatre of the real’, with a particular interest in verbatim theatre. She argues that any reality being framed on stage will inevitably cite the already mediated frames of reference underpinning and bolstering this reality, making it almost impossible to avoid replaying the ‘right kind’ of dementia story and summoning ‘normative age-and-dementia-effects’ (assumptions underpinning naturalised representations of old adults with dementia). Gibson importantly considers what dementia can offer ‘theatre of the real’, as dementia draws attention to the nature of the ‘truth’ of any story, whether from someone with dementia or not. No one can tell an unchanging and true life story which can then be represented on stage in a direct and unmediated fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Garde and Mumford see Martin’s choice not to capitalise her phrase “theatre of the real” (2013) as one which underlines the fluidity of the diverse practices she investigates; they choose the opposite move and capitalise their “Theatre of Real People” to convey a “more containable or discrete (if by no means fixed) type of theatre-making” (2016, 7).

  2. 2.

    Despite occasional recourse to the work of memory theorists, the domain of memory is too large and unwieldy for me to do it justice within this book’s scope.

  3. 3.

    This is an idea proposed by both Derek Paget (2009) and verbatim scholar Caroline Wake (2010a). Wake argues that, in certain ways, particular theatre practices “do … different kinds of cultural work” (ibid., 21) and therefore still need to be distinguished, otherwise any muscularity in describing differences in the various practices under their mantles will be lost. Writing about asylum seeker plays in Australia from 2000 to 2005, Wake argues that verbatim plays “were often writing a subaltern history of the period (by interviewing those who had been absented from the public record) while documentary plays were writing a subversive history … (by re-reading publically [sic] available documents ‘against the grain’)” (2010a, 21).

  4. 4.

    In practice, this is happening frequently: the German company Rimini Protocol has people, not professional actors, perform their own stories on stage. Their Radio Muezzin (which I saw at the Sydney Festival in early 2012) had four muezzins from mosques in Cairo recount their ceremonial practices through telling their distinct stories. These are “‘the experts of the everyday’ (people who are specialists in a particular field of life)” (Garde and Mumford 2013, 149). Writing mainly in reference to performance art, art historian Claire Bishop (2012, 219) uses the term “‘delegated performance’” to account for this practice of professionals hiring non-professionals to do work on their behalf (e.g. performance artist Marina Abramović).

  5. 5.

    Johann Christoph Friedrich von Schiller, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz were among these playwrights.

  6. 6.

    Lenz (1835) is a study of schizophrenia based on a Minister’s journal notes. Woyzeck (1837) is a working-class tragedy based on documentation about three nineteenth-century murders and medical reports on the mental health of Johann Woyzeck, an actual person (Garde et al. 2010, 10).

  7. 7.

    An example is In Spite of Everything! (Trotz alledem!) (1925), co-produced with Felix Gasbarra. A political revue of a ten-year history of the German Communist Party, this production marked the emergence of “a new form of theatre composed entirely of visual and verbal documents” (Favorini, xviii cited in Garde et al. 2010, 11), including montages of projected newsreel footage, recorded speeches, news extracts, photographs, and film sequences from the First World War.

  8. 8.

    As Garde et al. (2010) report, in the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics (USSR), the Blue Blouse troupe presented Living Newspapers commissioned by the Department of Agitation and Propaganda (Agitprop) to present ‘facts’ and information about the Russian Revolution to a vast number of mostly illiterate people. Starting from actors just reading the newspapers, these shows became livelier over the years with the use of slides, songs, and snippets of film. In the Depression era, from 1929, the form spread to the UK and the USA. In the USA, it manifested in the Federal Theatre Project’s Living Newspapers, which were socially engaged plays based on newspaper reports; in the UK, the Unity Theatre took up the form. Both presented challenges to totalitarian regimes and told stories about the capitalist victims of the Depression.

  9. 9.

    Two of these were Rolf Hochhuth’s The Representative (1963) and Peter Weiss’ The Investigation (1965), both written nearly twenty years after the end of the Second World War. Of interest here is that Piscator directed both these productions, as well as Heinar Kipphardt’s In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer (1964) (Cantrell 2015).

  10. 10.

    The work of these practitioners was in the lineage of the UK radio ballads of the 1950s, which culminated in Theatre Workshop’s Oh What a Lovely War (1963); as well, they were clearly indebted to the UK documentary films of the 1930s and 1940s and the European plays of Berthold Brecht and Erwin Piscator (Paget 1987, 318–319).

  11. 11.

    Parramatta Girls is an example of what Valentine calls “‘massaged verbatim’” (Smith 2014, 16) with the eight characters in the play composites of the many women interviewed (more than 35 ex-Parramatta Girls home inmates).

  12. 12.

    The Laramie Project is about Kaufman and company’s venture to Laramie, Wyoming, to write a verbatim play about the effects of the 1998 torture and murder of a young gay university student, Matthew Shepard, on its townspeople. Stuff Happens is about the events which led up to the 2003 Iraq war with excerpts taken from members of the Bush and Blair administrations and other well-known political figures.

  13. 13.

    Theatrical realism first developed in the 1870s with a set of dramatic conventions targeting a greater fidelity to ‘real’ life in both text and performance. It centred on the ordinary speech, behaviour, and settings of the middle classes. It was a theatre interested in the actual problems of people’s lives and was established in reaction to the artificial comedies and melodramas which were the mainstay of most of the nineteenth-century stages of Europe (Kernodle and Kernodle 1978, 126–130).

  14. 14.

    In using the phrase, the ‘British school’, I do not mean to infer that all British theatre of the real follows in this line. I use it to refer primarily to those playwrights who talk about their practices in the book Verbatim, verbatim (2008) edited by Will Hammond and Dan Steward: specifically, Richard Norton-Taylor, Robin Soans, David Hare, Nicholas Kent, and Alecky Blythe. Their ideas about the value of verbatim as a technology of truth share many similarities.

  15. 15.

    First defined by Plato, diegesis as redefined by Martin Puchner (2002, 24) refers to “‘indirect descriptive or narrative representation of objects, persons, spaces or events through language…spoken by a rhapsode, narrator, chorus, or author or represented in the dramatic text for the reader’” (quoted in Wake 2018b, 117).

  16. 16.

    Headphone verbatim faithfully reproduces the speech patterns of its sources. Using headphones, actors listen to and deliver as closely as possible the words and vocal inflections of a pre-written and carefully edited script recorded from interviews (including pauses and stutters). The form was first introduced in the UK by Mark Wing-Davey at a workshop at the London Actors Centre, at which both UK theatre maker Alecky Blythe and Australian Roslyn Oades were participants (Brown 2010, 84). Blythe went on to establish the company Recorded Delivery and Oades to work with Sydney-based Urban Theatre Projects. Blythe has expressed the strains of the commitment to “remaining faithful to the interview and creating a dramatic narrative” (2008, 95), concerns which most of the British verbatim practitioners in the book Verbatim, verbatim also repeatedly express.

  17. 17.

    English actor and director Henry Siddons, along with Johann Jacob Engel, documented many of these nineteenth-century gestures in Practical Illustrations of Rhetorical Gestures and Action (1822).

  18. 18.

    Both also deploy what The New Yorker theatre reviewer Hilton Als terms “the round tones of a classically trained act-or” (2010; original emphasis).

  19. 19.

    There are correspondences between dementia testimonies and trauma testimonies. Cathy Caruth, following Freud, defines trauma as “that which resists simple comprehension” (1996, 6) and argues that it is best apprehended as an unqualified break in consciousness of being in the world; “a wound inflicted not on the body but on the mind … a breach in the process of cognition” (1996, 3–4 cited in Stuart Fisher 2011, 114). Research into the experience of living with dementia describes how individuals experience frequent traumatic ruptures in the fabric of their lives, usually to do with memory loss. It is quite common for people with dementia to endure bewildering absences in everyday life “threatening the continuity and familiarity of assumptions that enable us all to live day-by-day” (Mitchell et al. 2011, 23). One moment the person could be having breakfast and the next he or she could be down at the shops with four to five hours having passed and no idea of how they got there. The reality of dementia, in itself and as a lived trauma, is that it may not be able to be ‘told’ by those who have it, depending on the stage of the disease, of course, or at least it may not be able to be told in a linear, logical, and continuous narrative mode.

References

  • Als, H. 2010. Sideshow. Deconstructing “Romeo and Juliet”. The Theater. The New Yorker, January 11. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/01/11/sideshow. Accessed 27 Sept 2015.

  • Anderson, M., and L. Wilkinson. 2007. A resurgence of verbatim theatre: Authenticity, empathy and transformation. Australasian Drama Studies 50: 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrish, J. 1981. The anti-theatrical prejudice. Berkeley, CA, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. 2012. Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London and Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleeker, M. 2011. Visuality in the theatre: The locus of looking. London and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blythe, A. 2008. Alecky Blythe. In Verbatim, verbatim: Contemporary documentary theatre, ed. W. Hammond and D. Steward, 77–102. London: Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, S.J. 2006. Putting the document into documentary: An unwelcome corrective? TDR: The Drama Review 50 (3): 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., ed. 2010. Verbatim: Staging memory & community. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble. New York and Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, T. 2015. Verbatim theatre. Drama online. http://www.dramaonlinelibrary.com/genres/verbatim-theatre-iid-2551. Accessed 8 April 2015.

  • Caruth, C. 1996. Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. 2009. Ngapartji Ngapartji: Telling aboriginal Australian stories. In Get real: Documentary theatre past and present, ed. A. Forsyth and C. Megson, 122–139. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conquergood, D. 2002. Performance studies interventions and radical research. The Drama Review 46 (2, T174, Summer): 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulthard, M. 2004. Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics 25 (4): 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, F. 1983. Course in general linguistics. Trans. R. Harris. Originally published in 1916. Peru, IL: Open Court Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. 1994. The society of the spectacle. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. New York, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, E. 1989. Mimesis, mimicry and the true-real. Modern Drama 32 (1): 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J. 2005. Utopia in performance: Finding hope at the theater. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. 2008, Art, war, and objects: Reality effects in the contemporary theatre. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Rhode Island, MA: Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., and C. Megson, eds. 2009. Get real: Documentary theatre past and present. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, J. 2011. Naked truth: Theatrical performance and the diagnostic turn. Theatre Research International 36 (2): 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde, U., and M. Mumford. 2013. Postdramatic reality theatre and productive insecurity: Destabilising encounters with the unfamiliar in theatre from Sydney to Berlin. In Postdramatic theatre and the political, ed. K. Jürs-Munby, J. Carroll, and S. Giles, 147–164. London, New Delhi, New York, NY, and Sydney: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Theatre of real people: Diverse encounters at Berlin’s Hebbel am Ufer and beyond. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde, U., M. Mumford, and C. Wake. 2010. A short history of verbatim theatre. In Verbatim: Staging memory & community, ed. P. Brown, 9–17. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. 2011. Saying it right: Creating ethical verbatim theatre. Neo 4 (3). http://www.arts.mq.edu.au/documents/hdr_journal_neo/neoJanet2011_2.pdf.

  • Gullette, M. 2004. Aged by culture. Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, W., and D. Steward, eds. 2008. Verbatim, verbatim: Contemporary documentary theatre. London: Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V.G. 2008. Constructing the self. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddon, D. 2008. Autobiography and performance. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, E. 2010. Theatre & feeling. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Y. 2009. Verbatim theatre in South Africa: Living history in a person’s performance. In Get real: Documentary theatre past and present, ed. A. Forsyth and C. Megson, 209–223. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R., and M. Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürs-Munby, K., J. Carroll, and S. Giles, eds. 2013. Postdramatic theatre and the political. London, New Delhi, New York, NY, and Sydney: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A.P. 2012. Restor(Y)Ing power, intimacy and desire in academic work: Relational academic development and learning development practice. Unpublished Doctor of Education Thesis. Sydney: University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernodle, G., and P. Kernodle. 1978. Invitation to the theatre. New York, San Diego, Chicago, San Francisco, Atlanta: Harcourt Brace Jovanich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathem, L. 2005. Bringing old and young people together: An interview project. In Remembering: Oral history performance, ed. D. Pollock, 67–84. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, H.-T. 2006. Postdramatic theatre. Trans. K. Jürs-Munby. London and New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibing, A. 2006. Divided gazes: Alzheimer’s disease, the person within, and death in life. In Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss and the anthropology of senility, ed. A. Leibing and L. Cohen, 240–268. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, M. 2008. Verbatim theatre, media relations and ethics. In A concise companion to contemporary British and Irish drama, ed. N. Holdsworth and M. Luckhurst, 212. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeham, P.B. 1998. Community stories: Aftershocks and verbatim theatre. In Our Australian theatre in the 1990s, ed. V. Kelly, 168–181. Amsterdam: Rodopi. QUT Digital Repository. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ http://www.rodopi.nl/senj.asp?BookId=AP+7. Accessed 30 May 2011.

  • Martin, C. 2006. Bodies of evidence. TDR: Drama Review 50 (3): 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Dramaturgy of the real on the world stage. Basingstoke, and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Theatre of the real. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The real and its outliers. Review. Theatre Journal 67 (1): 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, G. 2014. Why do you think you’re right about language? You’re not. Slate. 30 May. http://www.slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2014/05/30/arguing_over_language_everyone_has_an_idiolect_standard_english_prescriptivism.html. Accessed 19 July 2014.

  • McMahan, J. 1996. Cognitive disability, misfortune, and justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1): 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Cognitive disability, cognitive enhancement, and moral status. Paper presented at the Cognitive Disability: Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy Conference. Stony Brook Manhattan, NY, September 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G.J., S. Dupuis, and C. Jonas-Simpson. 2011. Countering stigma with understanding: The role of theatre in social change and transformation. CTR 146 (Spring): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. 2014. Depth, significance, and absence: Age-effects in new British theatre. Age Culture Humanities: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1 (Spring). http://ageculturehumanities.org/WP/depth-significance-and-absence-age-effects-in-new-British-theatre/. Accessed 14 May 2014.

  • Norton-Taylor, R. 2008. Richard Norton-Taylor. In Verbatim, verbatim: Contemporary documentary theatre, ed. W. Hammond and D. Steward, 103–131. London: Oberon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overboe, J. 2009. Affirming an impersonal life: A different register for disability studies. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (3): 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Online. 2014/2015. ww.oed.com.simsrad.net.ocs.mq.edu.au.

  • Paget, D. 1987. “Verbatim theatre”: Oral history and documentary techniques. New Theatre Quarterly 3 (12): 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The “broken tradition” of documentary theatre and its continued powers of endurance. In Get real: Documentary theatre past and present, ed. A. Forsyth and C. Megson, 224–238. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchner, M. 2002. Stage fright: Modernism, anti-theatricality, and drama. Baltimore.:Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt, J. 2006. Towards a poetics of theatre and public events: In the case of Stephen Lawrence. TDR: The Drama Review 50 (3, Fall): 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The promise of documentary. In Get real: Documentary theatre past and present, ed. A. Forsyth and C. Megson, 6–23. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salverson, J. 1996. Performing emergency: Witnessing, popular theatre, and the lie of the literal. Theatre Topics 6 (2): 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Change on whose terms? Theater 31 (3): 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. 1997. The explicit body in performance. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddons, H., and J.J. Engel. 1822. Practical illustrations of rhetorical gestures and action. London: Sherwood, Neely and Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1996. Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Speciesism and moral status. Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4): 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart Fisher, A. 2011. Trauma, authenticity and the limits of verbatim. Performance Research 16 (1): 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. 2013. Voice, body and the transmission of the real in documentary theatre. Contemporary Theatre Review 223 (3): 368–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tigner, A.L. 2002. The Laramie Project: Western pastoral. Modern Drama 45 (1): 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, C. 2010a. Performing witness: Testimonial theatre in the age of asylum. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of NSW Sydney. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/50245.

  • ———. 2010b. Verbatim theatre within a spectrum of practices. In Verbatim: Staging memory & community, ed. P. Brown, 6–8. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. Email communication with the author. Sydney, April 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Postcard from the edge: Tom Holloway’s Beyond the Neck and the limits of verbatim. Australasian Drama Studies 72 (April): 100–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. 2008. Creating verbatim theatre: Exploring the gap between public inquiry and private. Unpublished PHD thesis, University of Sydney. https://www.sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/doctoral_studies/completed_theses/Wilkinson.shtml.

Plays

  • Brittain, V., N. Kent, R. Norton-Taylor, and G. Slovo. 2014. The Tricycle: Collected Tribunal plays. 1994–2012. London: Oberon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchner, G. 1993. Complete plays, Lenz and other writings. Trans. J. Reddick. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decent, C. 2008. Embers. Brisbane: Playlab Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. The Campaign. White Box Theatre and Seymour Centre, Sydney. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, David. 2004. Stuff happens. New York: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochhuth, R. (1963) 2006. The representative. Trans. C. and R. Winston. USA: Grove Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horin, R. 2005. Through the wire. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, M. and the Members of the Tectonic Theater Project. 2001. The Laramie project. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipphardt, H. 1967. In the matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Trans. R. Speirs. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeham, P., and Workers Cultural Action Committee. 2001. Aftershocks. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Theater of Oklahoma. 2009. Romeo and Juliet. Conceived and directed by P. Liska and K. Copper. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, T. 2004. Minefields and miniskirts. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman, A., and K. Viner, eds. 2008. My name is Rachel Corrie: Taken from the writings of Rachel Corrie. New York: Dramatist’s Play Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, O.K., and J. Mills. 2004. Sandakan threnody. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidetrack Performance Group, and D. Mamouney. 2002. Citizen X. The Hanger Collection of Australian Playscripts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. 2014. Notes from Alana Valentine. Teachers’ Notes. Parramatta: Riverside Education. http://riversideparramatta.com.au/wp-content/uploads/Parramatta-Girls-Teachers-Notes-2014.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2020.

  • Theatre Workshop. 1967. Oh what a lovely war, ed. J. Littlewood. London and New York: Bloomsbury Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Theatre Projects. 2001. Asylum. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, A. 2004. Run rabbit run. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Parramatta girls/eyes to the floor. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Version 1.0. 2012. Remixing politics: Three documentary plays (CMI: A certain maritime incident, wages of spin and deeply offensive and utterly untrue). Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, P. 1966. The investigation. Oratorio in 11 cantos: A dramatic re-construction of the Frankfurt war crimes trials. Great Britain: Caldar and Boyars.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Gibson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gibson, J. (2020). Staging the ‘Reality’ of Dementia. In: Dementia, Narrative and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46547-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics