Abstract
In the context of a steady increase in the number of postgraduate, post-doctoral and established researchers conducting fieldwork on peace and conflict-related themes internationally, this chapter explores the challenges associated with researching identity groups, communities or geographical locations which have been deemed ‘over-researched’. Having first explored and problematized the label of an ‘over-researched society’, and the reasons why some individuals, communities and locations garner more research attention than others, the chapter seeks to sensitize the reader to the potential constraints and compromises which go with the over-researched territory, and to provide practical advice and strategies to consider before, during and subsequent to conducting field research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Based at the University of Essex, the UK Data Archive provides access to the largest collection of social science and humanities data in the UK. Available at: https://www.data-archive.ac.uk/.
- 2.
The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) is a long-standing archive of over 500,000 social science data sets. Available at: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/.
References
Bainbridge, R., K. Tsey, J. Mccalman, I. Kinchin, Vicki Saunders, Felecia Watkin-Lui, Y. Cadet-James, A. Miller, and K. Lawson. 2015. No one’s discussing the elephant in the room: Contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research. BMC Public Health 15 (696): 1–10.
Boesten, J., and M. Henry. 2018. Between fatigue and silence: The challenges of conducting research on sexual violence in conflict. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25 (4): 568–588.
Chamber, R. 2008. Revolutions in development inquiry. Earthscan: Abingdon, Oxon.
Clark, T. 2008. ‘“We’re over-researched here!”: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42 (5): 953–970.
Cleary, M., N. Siegfried, P. Escott, and G. Walter. 2016. Super research or super-researched?: When enough is enough…. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 37 (5): 380–382.
Cyranoski, D., N. Gilbert, H. Ledford, A. Nayar, and M. Yahia. 2011. Education: The PhD factory. Nature 472 (7343): 276–279.
Darby, J. 1997. Scorpions in a bottle: Conflicting cultures in Northern Ireland. London: Minority Rights Publications.
Firchow, P., and R. Mac Ginty. 2017. Including hard-to-access populations using mobile phone surveys and participatory indicators. Sociological Methods and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729702.
Fujii, L. 2010. Shades of truth and lies: Interpreting testimonies of war and violence. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 231–241.
Kindon, S., R. Pain, and M. Kesby (eds.). 2007. Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge.
Koen, J., D. Wassenaar, and N. Mamotte. 2017. The ‘over-researched community’: An ethics analysis of stakeholder views at two South African HIV prevention research sites. Social Science and Medicine 194 (2017): 1–9.
Neal, S., G. Mohan, A. Cochrane, and K. Bennett. 2016. “You can’t move in Hackney without bumping into an anthropologist”: Why certain places attract research attention. Qualitative Research 16 (5): 491–507.
OECD. 2016. OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pascucci, E. 2017. The humanitarian infrastructure and the question of over-research: Reflections on fieldwork in the refugee crises in the Middle East and North Africa. Area 49 (2): 249–255.
Sanghera, G.S., and S. Thapar-Björkert. 2008. Methodological dilemmas: Gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (3): 543–562.
Schiltz, J., and K. Büscher. 2018. Brokering research with war-affected people: The tense relationship between opportunities and ethics. Ethnography 19 (1): 124–146.
Schnarch, B. 2004. Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health 1: 80–97.
South African San Institute. 2017. San code of research ethics (Kimberley, South Africa: South African San Institute). Available at: http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf.
Sukarieh, M., and S. Tannock. 2013. On the problem of over-researched communities: The case of the Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in Lebanon. Sociology 47 (3): 494–508.
Visoka, G. 2017. Shaping peace in Kosovo: The politics of peacebuilding and statehood. London: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, G. (2021). Researching Over-Researched Societies. In: Mac Ginty, R., Brett, R., Vogel, B. (eds) The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46432-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46433-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)