Skip to main content

Researching Over-Researched Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork
  • 1171 Accesses

Abstract

In the context of a steady increase in the number of postgraduate, post-doctoral and established researchers conducting fieldwork on peace and conflict-related themes internationally, this chapter explores the challenges associated with researching identity groups, communities or geographical locations which have been deemed ‘over-researched’. Having first explored and problematized the label of an ‘over-researched society’, and the reasons why some individuals, communities and locations garner more research attention than others, the chapter seeks to sensitize the reader to the potential constraints and compromises which go with the over-researched territory, and to provide practical advice and strategies to consider before, during and subsequent to conducting field research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based at the University of Essex, the UK Data Archive provides access to the largest collection of social science and humanities data in the UK. Available at: https://www.data-archive.ac.uk/.

  2. 2.

    The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) is a long-standing archive of over 500,000 social science data sets. Available at: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/.

References

  • Bainbridge, R., K. Tsey, J. Mccalman, I. Kinchin, Vicki Saunders, Felecia Watkin-Lui, Y. Cadet-James, A. Miller, and K. Lawson. 2015. No one’s discussing the elephant in the room: Contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research. BMC Public Health 15 (696): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesten, J., and M. Henry. 2018. Between fatigue and silence: The challenges of conducting research on sexual violence in conflict. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 25 (4): 568–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamber, R. 2008. Revolutions in development inquiry. Earthscan: Abingdon, Oxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. 2008. ‘“We’re over-researched here!”: Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42 (5): 953–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, M., N. Siegfried, P. Escott, and G. Walter. 2016. Super research or super-researched?: When enough is enough…. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 37 (5): 380–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski, D., N. Gilbert, H. Ledford, A. Nayar, and M. Yahia. 2011. Education: The PhD factory. Nature 472 (7343): 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, J. 1997. Scorpions in a bottle: Conflicting cultures in Northern Ireland. London: Minority Rights Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firchow, P., and R. Mac Ginty. 2017. Including hard-to-access populations using mobile phone surveys and participatory indicators. Sociological Methods and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, L. 2010. Shades of truth and lies: Interpreting testimonies of war and violence. Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindon, S., R. Pain, and M. Kesby (eds.). 2007. Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koen, J., D. Wassenaar, and N. Mamotte. 2017. The ‘over-researched community’: An ethics analysis of stakeholder views at two South African HIV prevention research sites. Social Science and Medicine 194 (2017): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, S., G. Mohan, A. Cochrane, and K. Bennett. 2016. “You can’t move in Hackney without bumping into an anthropologist”: Why certain places attract research attention. Qualitative Research 16 (5): 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pascucci, E. 2017. The humanitarian infrastructure and the question of over-research: Reflections on fieldwork in the refugee crises in the Middle East and North Africa. Area 49 (2): 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanghera, G.S., and S. Thapar-Björkert. 2008. Methodological dilemmas: Gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31 (3): 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiltz, J., and K. Büscher. 2018. Brokering research with war-affected people: The tense relationship between opportunities and ethics. Ethnography 19 (1): 124–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnarch, B. 2004. Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health 1: 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African San Institute. 2017. San code of research ethics (Kimberley, South Africa: South African San Institute). Available at: http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf.

  • Sukarieh, M., and S. Tannock. 2013. On the problem of over-researched communities: The case of the Shatila Palestinian Refugee Camp in Lebanon. Sociology 47 (3): 494–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visoka, G. 2017. Shaping peace in Kosovo: The politics of peacebuilding and statehood. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gráinne Kelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kelly, G. (2021). Researching Over-Researched Societies. In: Mac Ginty, R., Brett, R., Vogel, B. (eds) The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics