Skip to main content

Conflict Ethnography Goes Online: Chatnography of the Ukrainian Volunteer Battalions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork

Abstract

This chapter discusses how conflict ethnography—ethnography attuned to the challenges of researching armed conflict—went online in my study of Ukrainian volunteer battalions. This online turn was both unexpected and exciting. While I had never been particularly interested in online research, social media and instant messaging nevertheless appeared to offer unforeseen opportunities for remotely researching a scantly studied conflict. In this chapter, I describe three revelatory moments that marked the rise, fall and plateau of the resulting chatnography, or the interaction through instant messaging apps and social media. Ultimately, I advocate caution when it comes to the use of digital methods in the study of armed conflict: while chatnography may be unavoidable, it can only work as one dimension of a broader ethnographic effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, the only research at that time appeared to have been by Puglisi (2015), Karagiannis (2016), and Malyarenko and Galbreath (2016).

  2. 2.

    Vice News, “Selfie Soldiers: Russia Checks into Ukraine,” June 16, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zssIFN2mso; The soldier had been initially identified in Maksymilian Czuperski et al., “Hiding in Plain Sight: Putin’s War in Ukraine” (Atlantic Council, May 2015), http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/publications/Hiding_in_Plain_Sight/HPS_English.pdf.

  3. 3.

    Walbert Castillo, “Air Force Intel Uses ISIS ‘moron’ Post to Track Fighters” (CNN, June 5, 2015), https://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/05/politics/air-force-isis-moron-twitter/index.html.

  4. 4.

    Katie Benner et al., “Saudis’ Image Makers: A Troll Army and a Twitter Insider” (New York Times, October 20, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/20/us/politics/saudi-image-campaign-twitter.html.

  5. 5.

    For these, see Sebastian van Baalen, “‘Google Wants to Know Your Location’: The Ethical Challenges of Fieldwork in the Digital Age,” Research Ethics 14, no. 4 (2018): 1–17.

  6. 6.

    “Disinformation Cases MH17” (EU vs Disinfo, May 18, 2020), https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?disinfo_keywords%5B%5D=77107&date=.

References

  • Barratt, Monica J., and Alexia Maddox. 2016. Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography. Qualitative Research 16 (6): 701–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellingcat. 2020. Posts tagged: MH17. https://www.bellingcat.com/tag/mh17/.

  • Benner, Katie, Mark Mazzetti, Ben Hubbard, and Mike Isaac. “Saudis’ image makers: A troll army and a Twitter insider. New York Times, October 20, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/20/us/politics/saudi-image-campaign-twitter.html.

  • Boellstorff, Tom, Bonnie Nardi, Celia Pearce, and T.L. Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliandro, Alessandro. 2018. Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 47 (5): 551–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, Walbert. 2015. Air force intel uses ISIS ‘moron’ post to track fighters. CNN, June 5. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/05/politics/air-force-isis-moron-twitter/index.html.

  • Czuperski, Maksymilian, John Herbst, Eliot Higgins, Alina Polyakova, and Damon Wilson. 2015. Hiding in plain sight: Putin’s war in Ukraine. Atlantic Council, May. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/publications/Hiding_in_Plain_Sight/HPS_English.pdf.

  • Dalsgaard, Steffen. 2016. The ethnographic use of Facebook in everyday life. Anthropological Forum 26 (1): 96–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU vs Disinfo. 2020. “Disinformation Cases MH17.” https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?disinfo_keywords%5B%5D=77107&date=.

  • Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. Discipline and practice: ‘The field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology. In Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science, ed. Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson, 1–46. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, Christine. 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Signe. 2017. Two or three things I love about ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, Hans, and Wolfgang Knöbl. 2013. War in social thought: Hobbes to the present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Käihkö, Ilmari. 2016. Bush generals and small boy battalions: Military cohesion in Liberia and beyond. PhD dissertation, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käihkö, Ilmari. 2018. A nation-in-the-making, in arms: Control of force, strategy and the Ukrainian volunteer battalions. Defence Studies 18 (2): 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käihkö, Ilmari. 2019. On brokers, commodification of information and Liberian former combatants. Civil Wars 21 (2): 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käihkö, Ilmari. 2020. Conflict chatnography: Instant messaging apps, social media and conflict ethnography in Ukraine. Ethnography 21 (1): 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, Emmanuel. 2016. Ukrainian volunteer fighters in the eastern front: Ideas, political-social norms and emotions as mobilization mechanisms. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (1): 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malyarenko, Tetyana, David J. Galbreath. 2016. Paramilitary motivation in Ukraine: Beyond integration and abolition. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (1): 113–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzato, Kimitaka. 2017. The Donbass war: Outbreak and deadlock. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 25 (2): 175–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveeva, Anna. 2018. Through times of trouble: Conflict in Southeastern Ukraine explained from within. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, David. 2006. Anti-social anthropology? Objectivity, objection, and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12: 935–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, June. 2007. Ethnology in a revolutionary setting. In Ethnographic fieldwork: An anthropological reader, ed. Antonius C.G.M. Robben and Jeffrey A. Sluka, 223–233. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuch, Olga, and Gwendolyn Sasse. 2016. The Maidan in movement: Diversity and the cycles of protest. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4): 556–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Sarah, Heather Horst, John Postill, Larissa Hjorth, Tania Lewis, and Jo Tacchi. 2016. Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottier, Johan, and Alex De Waal. 1994. Genocide in Rwanda (Letters). Anthropology Today 10 (4): 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puglisi, Rosaria. 2015. Heroes or villains? Volunteer battalions in post-maidan Ukraine. Institutio Affari Internazionali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, Thomas E. 2017. Churchill & Orwell: The fight for freedom. London: Duckworth Overlook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Richards. 2013. Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, Marci. 2017. The Ukrainian night: An intimate history of revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluka, Jeffrey A. 1990. Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization 49 (2): 114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasyuk, Yuri. 2018. Укpaїнcькi Дoбpoвoльчi Фopмyвaння: Cтвopeння Ta Фyнкцioнyвaння (2014–2015 Pp.) [Ukrainian Volunteer Formations: Creation and Functioning (2014–2015)]. PhD dissertation, National Defence University of Ukraine.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen, Sebastian. 2018. ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics 14 (4): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vice News. 2015. Selfie soldiers: Russia checks into Ukraine. June 16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zssIFN2mso.

  • Wilson, Andrew. 2014. Ukraine crisis: What it means for the West. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Elisabeth. 2006. The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology 29 (3): 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilmari Käihkö .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Käihkö, I. (2021). Conflict Ethnography Goes Online: Chatnography of the Ukrainian Volunteer Battalions. In: Mac Ginty, R., Brett, R., Vogel, B. (eds) The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics