Skip to main content

Solitary Decision-Making and Fieldwork Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork

Abstract

In the past decade, increasing administrative interest in safety and ethics has drawn new actors into decision-making processes around fieldwork. This chapter argues that despite the resulting new administrative procedures, and unacknowledged by them, researchers are still fundamentally alone in most security-relevant decisions. This is neither surprising nor necessarily a bad thing, but calls for particular attention to the biases, expectations and pressures that researchers are under when making these decisions. From ‘Indiana Jones Researchers’ to ‘Career Risk-Takers’, this chapter identifies harmful discourses around risk and fieldwork in academia and makes suggestions for a healthier way forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, many decisions also include questions of risks to other people, including participants and sub-contracted researchers/‘fixers’. This is a crucial issue for both fieldwork safety and fieldwork ethics, that has been taken up in other sections of this book and has been addressed in a range of recent publications, such as Sukarieh and Tannock (2019) or Peter and Strazzari (2017). Within the scope of this chapter, I focus on risks to independent researcher and particularly Ph.D. students.

  2. 2.

    Alongside a rapidly expanding academic literature, I would recommend the discussions on the platform ‘The New Ethnographer’.

  3. 3.

    While I wish I could take credit for this expression, it has a longer history. Lee (1995) refers to ‘Indiana Jones Imagery’, which is re-formulated as an ‘Indiana Jones class of ethnographers’ by Nilan (2002), before appearing as ‘Indiana Jones Researcher’ in Meyer (2007). I saw one of its most recent and insightful discussions by Laryssa Chomiak on a panel discussion on fieldwork and safety at the annual meeting of the Middle East Studies Association in San Antonio in 2018.

  4. 4.

    Again, the emphasis here is on the possibility of this, not its generality.

  5. 5.

    As mentioned above, this is not limited to Ph.D. students and junior researchers, but is particularly prevalent here.

  6. 6.

    Again, this is not to imply that this does not exist at all, but to emphasise its importance. This book is an example of this type of writing, as are some of the sources quoted above.

  7. 7.

    These notes are to highlight the importance of these topics, not to imply that they don’t currently exist in a variety of departments or contexts.

  8. 8.

    Raddi (2019).

  9. 9.

    It is worth noting that there is a parallel argument to the one made in this chapter that applies to research ethics, however, discussing this in full goes beyond the scope of this contribution.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Gallien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gallien, M. (2021). Solitary Decision-Making and Fieldwork Safety. In: Mac Ginty, R., Brett, R., Vogel, B. (eds) The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46433-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics