Abstract
This chapter analyses the use of the language of ‘self-determination’ and its associated ideas of freedom at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case on Kosovo’s declaration of independence (2008–2010). Despite the question having been put to the court in the case not mentioning ‘self-determination’, a strikingly high number of states participating in the proceedings made reference to the term. Unprecedentedly many states partook in the proceedings—including for the first time in the Court’s history, all permanent members of the UN Security Council. The case thus unexpectedly came to showcase recent international ‘self-determination’ discourse and how ideas of freedom were employed as legitimating standard. As in earlier ‘self-determination’ moments, the vast majority of those citing this language in the ICJ case relied on the liberal-conservative idea of freedom. Nonetheless, the Court’s final opinion revealed the endurance of the radical idea.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Augestad Knudsen, R. (2020). In Court: ‘Self-Determination’ and Freedom in the ICJ Case on Kosovo. In: The Fight Over Freedom in 20th- and 21st-Century International Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46429-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46429-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46428-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46429-5
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)