Skip to main content

Pregnancy in Prison

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Issues and Innovations in Prison Health Research

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

  • 497 Accesses

Abstract

It is thought that approximately 400–600 women at various stages of pregnancy are incarcerated each year and around 100 babies are born to women in prison every year. Pregnant women may have complex physical and mental health needs which require expert, individualised care. My qualitative research looked at the experience of being a pregnant woman in the English prison system (Abbott, The incarcerated pregnancy: An ethnographic study of perinatal women in English prisons. University of Hertfordshire, 2018). Through interviews with pregnant women, staff and extensive time in the field observing prison life, analysis has uncovered common themes such as: stigma, survival and resilience. Some women went to some lengths to navigate the masculine system of prison in order to access resources (food and exercise) by being a “role model prisoner” and finding strategies of resistance. Women have to navigate the prison system in order to access resources such as: the right kinds of nutrition and ways to avoid stress. They may find strategies of resistance and resilience in order to survive and for some women, being in prison helps to facilitate change. Some women have reported finding that being in prison was the thing that enforced this resistance, tenacity and capacity for change, if a woman gains the right kind of support. The focus of the chapter concentrates on some of the findings of the current research, specifically: equivalence of health care; nutritional well-being; basic provisions (or lack of); changes in identity, and compassion and support for pregnant women in prison and embeds anonymised quotes from research participants to highlight their experiences. The chapter also describes how prison can be a safe haven for some women and introduces the concept of pregnancy itself being a unique ‘turning point’ for desistance and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A mother and baby unit places women who have successfully applied for a place, with their babies up to 18 months of age.

  2. 2.

    Category A prisoners are deemed the most dangerous prisoners who require the strictest security conditions. Restricted status is any woman on remand or sentenced who poses a serious risk to public safety. Closed conditions are for women who are too substantial a risk for open conditions although requiring less security. Open conditions are for women who can be trusted and are a minimal risk to the public. (PSI 39/2011)

  3. 3.

    A closed prison is maximum security holding category A, restricted status, closed conditions and remand prisoners.

  4. 4.

    An open prison is a minimum-security prison where women can undertake outside work and are trusted with minimal supervision.

  5. 5.

    A Prison Service Order (PSO) or Prison Service Instruction (PSI) is guidance on how prison services are regulated.

  6. 6.

    ‘On the outside’ is a phrase used to describe being away from or not inside an institution such as a prison.

  7. 7.

    The current spend on food per prisoner per day in England is £2.02 (MoJ, 2015, Freedom of Information request from Prison Reform Trust).

  8. 8.

    Gaviscon is a liquid medication available to buy over the counter for the relief of heartburn.

  9. 9.

    Anti-hypertensive medication reduces blood pressure.

  10. 10.

    Pre-eclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication characterised by high blood pressure and fluid retention which, if untreated, can lead to eclamptic fits and cerebral vascular accident (stroke).

  11. 11.

    ACCT (Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork) is a series of documents opened in response to concern that a prisoner is at risk of self-harm or suicide.

  12. 12.

    Lactation is the secretion of milk from the breasts.

  13. 13.

    Desistance is the termination of offending behaviour (Maruna et al. 2012).

References

  • Abbott, L. (2015). A pregnant pause: Expecting in the prison estate. In L. Baldwin (Ed.), Mothering justice: Working with mothers in criminal and social justice settings (1st ed.). England: Waterside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, L., & Scott, T. (2020). Women’s experiences of breastfeeding in prison. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 27(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertson, K., O’Keefe, C., Burke, C., Lessing-Turner, G., & Renfrew, M. (2014). Addressing health inequalities for mothers and babies in prison. Health and Inequality: Applying Public Health Research to Policy and Practice, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, L., & Epstein, R. (2017). Short but not sweet: A study of the imposition of short custodial sentences on women, and in particular, on mothers. Leicester: De Montfort University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, L., O’Malley, S., & Galway, K. (2015). Mothers addicted: Working with complexity. In Chap. 10: 239–262: Baldwin, L. (2015). Mothering justice: Working with mothers in social and criminal justice settings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. (2009). The theory? Diet causes violence. The lab? Prison. Science, 325(5948), 1614–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker, A., and Dearnley, H. (2016). Faith and Identity in Prison. In Religion, Faith and Crime (pp. 347–373). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisman, A. (2008). Fair fare: Food as contested terrain in US prisons and jails. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, 15, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P., & Worrall, A. (2004). Analysing Women’s Imprisonment. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K. (2014). Feminism and Global Justice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corston, J. (2007). The Corston report: A report by baroness Jean Corston of a review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system: The need for a distinct, radically different, visibly-led, strategic, proportionate, holistic, woman-centred, integrated approach. Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. Committee of Ministers. (2006). European prison rules. Council of Europe. Recommendation Rec. 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the European Prison Rules.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B., Hulley, S., & Wright, S. (2017). The gendered pains of life imprisonment. British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2004). National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services, Standard 11: Maternity Services. London: DH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, S., & Letherby, G. (2003). Gender, identity and reproduction. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, S., Haynes, A., & Cuthbert, C. (2015). All babies count—An unfair sentence: Spotlight on the criminal justice system. London: NSPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerry, F., & Harris, L. (2016). Women in prison: Is the justice system fit for purpose? Halsbury Law Exchange. Retrieved September 21, 17, from http://blogs.lexisnexis.co.uk/halsburyslawexchange/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2016/11/SA-1016-077-Women-in-Prison-Paper-ONLINE-FINAL.pdf.

  • Godderis, R. (2006a). Dining in: The symbolic power of food in prison. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(3), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godderis, R. (2006b). Food for thought: An analysis of power and identity in prison food narratives. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 50, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg, S. (2013). State of the estate—Women in prison’s report on the women’s custodial estate 2011–12. London: Women in Prison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (2008). An Embedded Multimethod Approach to Prison Research. In King, R., and Wincup, E. (Eds.), Doing Research on Crime and Justice (Part V: Chapter 18: pp. 487–500). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, A. (2013). The body in society: An introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, A., Marshall, D., Parkinson, D., Delap, N., & Abbott, L. (2016). Birth charter for women in prison in England and Wales. London: Birth Companions.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The chicken and egg of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good: How ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., Wilson, L., & Curran, K. (2006). Why god is often found behind bars: Prison conversions and the crisis of self-narrative. Research in Human Development, 3(2-3), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., McNeill, F., Farrall, S., & Lightowler, C. (2012). Desistance Research and Probation Practice: Knowledge Exchange and Co-Producing Evidence-Based Practice Models. Irish Probation Journal, 9, October 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk Through Audits and Confidential Enquiries Across the UK (MBRRACE-UK). (2017). National perinatal epidemiology unit. Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk.

  • Ministry of Justice. (2020). Population and Capacity Briefing. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2010). Pregnancy and complex social factors: A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. NICE. Retrieved September 13, 17, from http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg110.

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2014). Pregnancy and complex social factors overview. NICE. Retrieved September 13, 17, from http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/pregnancy-and-complexsocialfactors.

  • National Offender Management Services. (2014). Mother and baby units prison service instruction (PSI) 49/2014 PI 63/2014. Retrieved August 10, 15, from https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/offenders/psipso/psi-2014/psi-49-2014-mother-and-baby-units.pdf.

  • Niebyl, J. R. (2010). Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(16), 1544–1550.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, J., Chase, L., & Alliance, M. (2006). Getting it Right: Services for Pregnant Women, New Mothers, and Babies in Prison: Lankelly Chase.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., and Bachman, R. (2017). The missing element in theories of desistance. The Routledge International Handbook of Life-Course Criminology, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plimmer, G. (2016, May 9). Care UK becomes biggest prison health care provider. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Bromley briefings, prison: The facts. Summer 2017. London: Prison Reform Trust. Retrieved August 10, 17, from http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Bromley%20Briefings/Summer%202017%20factfile.pdf.

  • Rogan, M. (2017). Human rights and correctional health policy: A view from Europe. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 13(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. (2015). ‘Tactics’, agency and power in women’s prisons. British Journal of Criminology, 56(2), 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Midwives. (2016). Caring for childbearing prisoners: A position paper. London: Position Statement for Women in Custody.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, G. (2015). Precarious Identities: ‘Young’ Motherhood, Desistance and Stigma. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15(4), 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlafer, R. J., Stang, J., Dallaire, D., Forestell, C. A., & Hellerstedt, W. (2017). Best practices for nutrition care of pregnant women in prison. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 23(3), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikand, M. (2017). Lost spaces: Is the current provision for women prisoners to gain a place in a prison mother and baby unit fair and accessible? The Griffins Society University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2002). Punishment and pleasure: Women, food and the imprisoned body. The Sociological Review, 50(2), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoyer, A. B. (2015a). Feeding relationships: Foodways and social networks in a women’s prison. Affilia, 30(1), 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smoyer, A. B. (2015b). Making fatty girl cakes food and resistance in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958/2007). The society of captives: A study of a maximum-security prison. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2013). The Bangkok rules. Retrieved from http://www.penalreform.org/priorities/women-in-the-criminal-justice-system/bangkok-rules-2/.

  • Walmsley, R. (2013). World prison population list. World Prison Brief. Institute for Criminal Policy Research, International Centre for Prison Studies, Birkbeck, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2004). Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice. 2nd edn. London: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Abbot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abbot, L. (2021). Pregnancy in Prison. In: Maycock, M., Meek, R., Woodall, J. (eds) Issues and Innovations in Prison Health Research. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46401-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46401-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46400-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46401-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics