Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to systematically review the advantages and risks of production organization on the basis of the Internet of things, as well as related barriers, and determine the feasibility of transition to this form of organization of production taking into account the interests of all stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: The authors operate with the fundamental principles of the systemic approach (theoretical base of research) and take into account the positions of all interested parties. The game approach serves as the methodological basis of the research. The authors use the methodology of game theory to compare the advantages, risks and risks (probability of application) of the three available options for organizing production on the basis of the Internet of things. Findings: It was found that the advantages of production organization based on the Internet of things for the enterprise of Industry 4.0 are associated with productivity growth, achieving “economies of scale”, reducing the share of faults and risks—with disruptions to machinery (production stoppage) due to insufficient provision of cyber security. Employees benefit from an increase in the intellectual component of work (routine processes are performed by machines), while the risk is associated with unemployment—the need for retraining or professional development. Advantages for consumers are associated with increased environmental efficiency of production by increasing the availability and quality of products, and the risk is associated with the energy crisis due to multiple increases in energy consumption by businesses. A comparative analysis of three available options for organizing production on the basis of the Internet of things has been carried out: partial automation of production, full automation of individual production processes and full automation of production on the example of modern Russia. Originality/value: A systematic view of production on the basis of the Internet of things has shown that in the current organization it is characterized by low efficiency, and therefore, it is inexpedient in all available options. This problem can be solved by the author’s recommendations to improve the organization of production based on the Internet of things for all available scenarios. The proposed recommendations reduce risks and increase the likelihood of benefiting from them, thus increasing efficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdulkadyrov, A. S., Ryzhov, I. V., Strokov, A. I., & Kamzolov, Yu. V. (2017). Current aspects of improving the organization of production of high-tech products. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Seriya Teknologiya Tekstil’noi Promyshlennosti, 371(5), 18–27.
Buchaev, Y. G., Iakovleva, E. A., & Putihin, I. E. (2014). Formation of efficiency of scientific activities of universities in Russia. Life Science Journal, 11(10), 78, 564–568.
Gadzhiev, M. M., & Buchaev, Y. G. (2014). Efficiency assessment of enterprise innovation activities. Life Science Journal, 11(10), 82, 581–586.
IMD. (2019). World digital competitiveness ranking 2018. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://www.imd.org/wcc/world-competitiveness-center-rankings/world-digital-competitiveness-rankings-2018/.
International Federation of Robotics. (2018). Level of robotization of industry in the world countries. Retrieved October 15, 2019, from https://rb.ru/story/countries-with-greatest-density-of-robots/.
Khachaturyan, A. A., Abdulkadyrov, A. S., Zhigulina, E. P., & Sirotkina, N. V. (2017). The issues of improving the investment climate and investment attractiveness of Russian industries in the medium-term perspective. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Seriya Teknologiya Tekstil’noi Promyshlennosti, 371(5), 40–43.
Khachaturyan, A. A., Khachaturyan, K. S., & Abdulkadyrov, A. S. (2018). Model of innovational development of modern Russian industry. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 622, 44–50.
Petrenko, E., Pritvorova, T., & Dzhazykbaeva, B. (2018). Sustainable development processes: Service sector in post-industrial economy. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.4(14).
Popkova, E. G. (2019). Preconditions of formation and development of industry 4.0 in the conditions of knowledge economy. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 169(1), 65–72.
Popkova, E. G., Egorova, E. N., Popova, E., & Pozdnyakova, U. A. (2019). The model of state management of economy on the basis of the Internet of things. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 826(1), 1137–1144.
Popkova, E. G., Morozova, I. A., & Litvinova, T. N. (2018). Transformational processes in the media system under industry conditions 4.0: future outlines and perspectives (reflections on the article by Alexander P. Sukhodolov, DSc. In Economics, Professor and I. A. Kuznetsova, PhD in Engineering, Associate Professor Designing the mass media as a homeostatic system by means of automation engineering: Basic concepts, structure, components). Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, 7(1), 145–154.
Popkova, E. G., & Parakhina, V. N. (2019). Managing the global financial system on the basis of artificial intelligence: Possibilities and limitations. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 57(1), 939–946.
Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (2018). Will Industry 4.0 and Other Innovations Impact Russia’s Development? In B. S. Sergi (Ed.) Exploring the future of Russia’s economy and markets: Towards sustainable economic development (pp. 51–68). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (Eds.). (2019). Digital economy: Complexity and variety vs. rationality. Springer International Publishing
Ragulina, Y. V. (2019). Priorities of development of industry 4.0 in modern economic systems with different progress in formation of knowledge economy. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 169, 167–174.
Research University Higher School of Economics (NIU HSE) (2019). Digital economy: 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019, from https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/12/26/1143130930/ice2019kr.pdf.
Sergi, B. S., Popkova, E. G., Sozinova, A. A., & Fetisova, O. V. (2019). Modeling Russian industrial, tech, and financial cooperation with the Asia-Pacific region. In B. S. Sergi (Ed.), Tech, smart cities, and regional development in contemporary Russia. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Sergi, B. S. (Ed.). (2019). Tech, smart cities, and regional development in contemporary Russia. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kushnir, A.M., Dianova, T.V., Osipenkova, O.Y. (2021). Organization of Production on the Basis of the Internet of Things: Barriers, Advantages and Risk. In: Buchaev, Y., Abdulmanapov, S., Abdulkadyrov, A., Khachaturyan, A. (eds) State and Corporate Management of Region’s Development in the Conditions of the Digital Economy. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46394-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46394-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46393-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46394-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)