Skip to main content

The Role of Trusteeship in Earth Governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ecological Integrity in Science and Law
  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

The call for institutionalizing Earth trusteeship cannot easily be reconciled with state sovereignty. The concept of state sovereignty emerged at a time of great distances and absolute national autonomy. However, in a globalized, interconnected world utterly depending on the integrity of Earth’s ecological systems, absolute territorial sovereignty is counterproductive and potentially life threatening. The chapter argues that the time is right for reconceptualizing state sovereignty. Sovereignty includes not just fiduciary and trusteeship obligations towards the state’s own citizens, but also towards humanity at large and Earth as a whole. The UN Agenda 2030 with its Sustainable Development Goals offer a window opportunity for institutionalizing Earth trusteeship at international and national levels. A critical tool for achieving this has been the adoption of the “Hague Principles for a Universal Declaration on Responsibilities for Human Rights and Earth Trusteeship” in the Peace Palace, The Hague, on the day of the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration for Human Rights (10 December 2018).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes P (2001) Capitalism 2.0: who owns the sky? Our common assets and the future of capitalism. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes P (2006) Capitalism 3.0: a guide to reclaiming the commons. Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, p 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenisti E (2013) Sovereigns as trustees of humanity: on the accountability of states to foreign stakeholders. Am J Int Law 107:295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann F (2011) Reforming global environmental governance: the case for a United Nation’s Environment Organisation (UNEO). Stakeholder Forum, Earth System Governance Project, and VU University Amsterdam, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier D (2008) The commons: a neglected sector of wealth creation. In: Heinrich S (ed) Genes, bytes and emissions: to whom does the world belong? Henrich Boll Stiftung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier D, Helfrich S (2019) Free, fair and alive: the insurgence power of the commons. New Society Publishers, British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann K (2015) Earth governance: trusteeship of the global commons. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 72

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann K (2016) The planetary integrity project: creating a safe operating space through law and governance. New Zealand Center for Environmental Law, Auckland, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann K (2018) Reclaiming the global commons: towards earth trusteeship. In: Martin B, Te Aho L, Humphries M (eds) Responsability: law and governance for living well with the earth. Routledge, London, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosselmann K (2019) The atmosphere as a global commons. In: Jaria-Manzano J, Borràs S (eds) Research handbook on global climate constitutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. chapter 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland Report (1987) Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

  • Colin Prentice I, House J, Cornell S (2012) Understanding the earth system: global change for application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Criddle E, Fox-Decent E (2009) A fiduciary theory of Jus Cogens. Yale J Int Law 34:331

    Google Scholar 

  • Earth Trusteeship Initiative (2018) The Hague principles for a universal declaration on responsibilities for human rights and earth trusteeship. http://www.earthtrusteeship.world/the-hague-principles-for-a-universal-declaration-on-human-responsibilities-and-earth-trusteeship/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

  • Ehlers E, Krafft T et al (eds) (2006) Earth system science in the anthropocene: emerging issues and problems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:3859. 1243–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn C (2016) Kant’s political philosophy as a theory of non-ideal normativity. Kant-Studien 107(1):89–110, pp 89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kump L, Kasting J, Crane R (2011) The Earth system, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton T (2016) Earth system science: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes P, Steffen W, Bosselmann K et al (2016) The safe operating space treaty: a new approach to managing. Our use of the earth system. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle

    Google Scholar 

  • Montini M, Volpe F (2015) Sustainable development goals: much ado about nothing. Environ Liability 4:141–147, p 142

    Google Scholar 

  • Raworth K (2012) A safe and just space for humanity; can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam discussion paper. Oxfam International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand P (2004) Sovereignty bounded: public trusteeship for common pool resources. Global Environ Politics 4(1):47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand P (2013) The rise of public trusteeship in international environmental law. Global trust working paper series 03/2013. http://globaltrust.tau.ac.il/publications/. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

  • Stoddart H (ed) (2011) A pocket guide to sustainable development governance, 1st edn. Stakeholder Forum, Commonwealth Secretariat, London, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P (1998) An ecological approach to international law: responding to the challenges of climate change. Routledge, London, p 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood MC (2007) Nature’s trust: a legal, political and moral frame for global warming. Environ Aff Law Rev 34:577

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood MC (2013) Nature’s trust: environmental law for a new ecological age. North Carolina University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

Legislative Citation

  • Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Bosselmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bosselmann, K. (2020). The Role of Trusteeship in Earth Governance. In: Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., Fermeglia, M. (eds) Ecological Integrity in Science and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46258-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46259-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics