Abstract
Sustaining ecological integrity is recognized worldwide as a strategic objective (e.g. the 2015 Paris Agreement), but a general consensus on the overall methodology for assessing ecological integrity is still missing. This chapter presents a contribution to the method of ecological integrity evaluation, using simple and theoretically grounded method to calculate three holistic indicators: exergy capture, biotic water flows and abiotic heterogeneity, utilizing open access remote sensing data (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8). Three variables are proposed as a representation of the respective indicators: NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), brightness temperature (BT) and vegetation surface heterogeneity (HG). Forests and wetlands have obtained higher results in the selected integrity indicators, while arable lands and urban areas relatively lower. The relative distance between the potential peak and the lowest performance in a landscape context is obtained by calculating a composite Regional Index of Ecological Integrity (RIEI [%]). The proposed approach can be used for various purposes including localization of naturally valuable areas, estimation of ecosystem condition or performance of ecosystem management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreasen JK, O’Neill RV, Noss R, Slosser NC (2001) Considerations for the development of a terrestrial index of ecological integrity. Ecol Indic 1:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(01)00007-3
Capmourteres V, Anand M (2016) Assessing ecological integrity: a multi-scale structural and functional approach using structural equation modeling. Ecol Indic 71:258–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.006
Castaldi F, Palombo A, Santini F, Pascucci S, Pignatti S, Casa R (2016) Evaluation of the potential of the current and forthcoming multispectral and hyperspectral imagers to estimate soil texture and organic carbon. Remote Sens Environ 179:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.025
Chrysafis I, Mallinis G, Siachalou S, Patias P (2017) Assessing the relationships between growing stock volume and Sentinel-2 imagery in a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. Remote Sens Lett. 8(6):508–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2017.1295479
Coppedge BR, Engle DM, Masters RE, Gregory MS (2006) Development of a grassland integrity index based on breeding bird assemblages. Environ Monit Assess 118(1–3):125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-1237-8
Delegido J, Verrelst J, Alonso L, Moreno J (2011) Evaluation of sentinel-2 red-edge bands for empirical estimation of green LAI and chlorophyll content. Sensors 11(7):7063–7081. https://doi.org/10.3390/s110707063
Forkuor G, Hounkpatin OKL, Welp G, Thiel M (2017) High resolution mapping of soil properties using remote sensing variables in South-Western Burkina Faso: a comparison of machine learning and multiple linear regression models. PLoS One 12(1):e0170478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170478
Fraser RH, Olthof I, Pouliot D (2009) Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada’s national parks. Remote Sens Environ 113(7):1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.019
Frélichová J, Vačkář D, Pártl A, Loučková B, Harmáčková ZV, Eliška L (2014) Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst Serv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
Immitzer M, Vuolo F, Atzberger C (2016) First experience with Sentinel-2 data for crop and tree species classifications in central Europe. Remote Sens 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8030166
Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol Indic 28:54–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
Karr JR, Dudley DR (1981) Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ Manage 5(1):55–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866609
Krofcheck DJ, Eitel JUH, Lippitt CD, Vierling LA, Schulthess U, Litvak ME (2016) Remote sensing based simple models of GPP in both disturbed and undisturbed piñon-juniper woodlands in the southwestern U.S. Remote Sens 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010020
Maes WH, Pashuysen T, Trabucco A, Veroustraete F, Muys B (2011) Does energy dissipation increase with ecosystem succession? Testing the ecosystem exergy theory combining theoretical simulations and thermal remote sensing observations. Ecol Modell 222(23–24):3917–3941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.08.028
Majasalmi T, Rautiainen M (2016) The potential of Sentinel-2 data for estimating biophysical variables in a boreal forest: a simulation study. Remote Sens Lett 7(5):427–436
Majer JD, Beeston G (1996) The biodiversity integrity index: an illustration using ants in Western Australia. Conserv Biol 10(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010065.x
Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoesis and cognition. the realization of the living., Maquinas y Seres vivos, Boston stu, 59–138, doi:EB N MATU
Müller F (2005) Indicating ecosystem and landscape organisation. Ecol Indic 5(4):280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.017
Müller F, Hoffmann-Kroll R, Wiggering H (2000) Indicating ecosystem integrity - theoretical concepts and environmental requirements. Ecol Modell 130(1–3):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00210-6
Paris Agreement (2015) European Commission’s Directorate-General for Climate Action, 1–16. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en. Accessed 30 May 2019
Parrott L (2010) Measuring ecological complexity. Ecol Indic 10(6):1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.03.014
Poggio L, Gimona A (2016) Assimilation of optical and radar remote sensing data in 3D mapping of soil properties over large areas. Sci Total Environ 579:1094–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.078
Reza MIH, Abdullah SA (2011) Regional Index of Ecological Integrity: a need for sustainable management of natural resources. Ecol Indic 11(2):220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.08.010
Rocchini D, Luque S, Pettorelli N, Bastin L, Doktor D, Faedi N, Feilhauer H, Féret JB, Foody GM, Gavish Y, Godinho S, Kunin WE, Lausch A, Leitão PJ, Marcantonio M, Neteler M, Ricotta C, Schmidtlein S, Vihervaara P, Wegmann M, Nagendra H (2018) Measuring β-diversity by remote sensing: a challenge for biodiversity monitoring. Methods Ecol Evol 9(8):1787–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12941
Roy DP, Wulder MA, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE, Allen RG, Anderson MC, Helder D, Irons JR, Johnson DM, Kennedy R, Scambos TA, Schaaf CB, Schott JR, Sheng Y, Vermote EF, Belward AS, Bindschadler R, Cohen WB, Gao F, Hipple JD, Hostert P, Huntington J, Justice CO, Kilic A, Kovalskyy V, Lee ZP, Lymburner L, Masek JG, McCorkel J, Shuai Y, Trezza R, Vogelmann J, Wynne RH, Zhu Z (2014) Landsat-8: science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens Environ 145:154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001
Ruaro R, Gubiani ÉA (2013) A scientometric assessment of 30 years of the Index of Biotic Integrity in aquatic ecosystems: applications and main flaws. Ecol Indic 29:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.016
Schneider ED, Kay JJ (1994) Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. Math Comput Model 19(6):25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(94)90188-0
Scholes RJ, Biggs R (2005) A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434(7029):45–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03289
Schumacher P, Mislimshoeva B, Brenning A, Zandler H, Brandt M, Samimi C, Koellner T (2016) Do red edge and texture attributes from high-resolution satellite data improve wood volume estimation in a semi-arid mountainous region?, Remote Sens. 8(7):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070540
Slocombe DS (1992) Environmental monitoring for protected areas: review and prospect. Environ Monit Assess 21(1):49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400057
van der Werff H, van der Meer F (2016) Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI provide data continuity for geological remote sensing. Remote Sens 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110883
Vargas L, Remme RP, Vargas L, Hein L, Remme RP (2017) Accounting for ecosystem assets using remote sensing in the Colombian Orinoco River Basin lowlands the Colombian Orinoco River Basin lowlands. J Appl Remote Sens 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.026008
Vincini M, Calegari F, Casa R (2016) Sensitivity of leaf chlorophyll empirical estimators obtained at Sentinel-2 spectral resolution for different canopy structures. Precis Agric 17(3):313–331
Xu C, Li Y, Hu J, Yang X, Sheng S, Liu M (2012) Evaluating the difference between the normalized difference vegetation index and net primary productivity as the indicators of vegetation vigor assessment at landscape scale. Environ Monit Assess 184(3):1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2039-1
Electronic Sources
AOPK: Regionální pracoviště Jižní Čechy. Agency of Nature Conservation. Available at: http://trebonsko.ochranaprirody.cz/, last access: 30.5.2019
CBD (2003) Methods for evaluating ecosystem integrity and monitoring ecosystem response. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/pa/tools/Methods%20for%20Evaluating%20Ecosystem%20Integrity%20and%20Monitoring%20Ecosystem%20Respons.pdf, last access: 30.5.2019
Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi targets: Avalilable at: https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/, last access: 30.5.2019
ESA SNAP: SNAP – Science Toolbox Exploitation Platform. European Space Agency. Available for download at: http://step.esa.int/main/download/, last access: 30.5.2019
ESA: Scihub Copernicus geoportal. European Space Agency. https://www.scihub.copernicus.eu, last access: 30.5.2019
USGS: Earth explorer geoportal, United States Geological Survey. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/, last access: 30.5.2019
Weiss, M., and Baret, F.: S2ToolBox Level 2 products: LAI, FAPAR, FCOVER, 53, 2016. Available at: http://step.esa.int/docs/extra/ATBD_S2ToolBox_L2B_V1.1.pdf, last access: 30.5.2019
Acknowledgements
We would especially like to thank our colleagues from the Institute of Natural Resource Conservation of the University in Kiel, namely Felix Müller, Wilhelm Windhorst and Claus-G. Schimming for consultation and advices on the methodological aspects and results interpretation. This study was made possible thanks to financial support from the DBU (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt) MOE scholarship, GAUK (Charles University Grant Agency [Grant no. 546517]) and Specific University Research [VS 260471] funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zelený, J., Mercado-Bettín, D. (2020). Evaluation of Ecological Integrity in Landscape Based on Remote Sensing Data. In: Westra, L., Bosselmann, K., Fermeglia, M. (eds) Ecological Integrity in Science and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46259-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46258-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46259-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)