Skip to main content

Analyzing Concordances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics

Abstract

In its simplest form, a concordance is a list of all attestations (or hits) of a particular search word or phrase, presented with a user-defined amount of context to the left and right of the search word or phrase. In this chapter, we describe how to generate and manipulate concordances, and we discuss how they can be employed in research and teaching. We describe how to generate, sort, and prune concordances prior to further analysis or use. In a section devoted to qualitative analysis, we detail how a discourse-analytical approach, either on the basis of unannotated concordance lines or on the basis of output generated by a prior quantitative examination of the data, can help describe and, crucially, explain the observable patterns, for instance by recourse to concepts such as semantic prosody. In a section devoted to quantitative analysis, we discuss how concordance lines can be scrutinized for various properties of the search term and annotated accordingly. Annotated concordance data enable the researcher to perform statistical analyses over hundreds or thousands of data points, identifying distributional patterns that might otherwise escape the researcher’s attention. In a third section, we turn to pedagogical applications of concordances. We close with a critical assessment of contemporary use of concordances as well as some suggestions for the adequate use of concordances in both research and teaching contexts, and give pointers to tools and resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a list of web-based concordancers (and many other corpus-linguistic resources), see http://martinweisser.org/corpora_site/CBLLinks.html. Accessed 31 May 2019.

References

  • Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., & McEnery, A. (2014). Find the doctors of death: the UK press and the issue of foreign doctors working in the NHS, a corpus-based approach. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The Discourse Reader (pp. 465–480). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2008). DDL: reaching the parts other teaching can’t reach? In A. Frankenberg-Garcia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Teaching and Language Corpora conference (pp. 38–44). Lisbon: Associação de Estudos e de Investigação Cientifíca do ISLA-Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 534–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, T. (1997). Is there any measurable learning from hands on concordancing? System, 25(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg-Garcia, A., Aston, G., & Flowerdew, L. (Eds.). (2011). New trends in corpora and language learning. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gries, S. T. (2016). Quantitative corpus linguistics with R: a practical introduction (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gries, S. T., & Wulff, S. (2013). The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners: towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. (2014). The effects of paper-based DDL on the acquisition of lexico-grammatical patterns in L2 writing. ReCALL, 26(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, T. F. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 23–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Warschauer, M., & Lee, J. H. (2018). The effects of corpus use on second language vocabulary learning: a multilevel meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics. published online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw, W. E. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: in honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, M. (2016). The representation of same-sex parents in children’s picturebooks: A corpus-assisted multimodal critical discourse analysis. Dissertation, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meaning: using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Partington, A. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer, U. (2008). Corpora and language teaching. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: an international handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 112–130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (2004). Trust the text: language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, V. (1991). Concordance-based vocabulary exercises: a viable alternative to gap-fillers. English Language Research Journal, 4, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: on the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2(1), 23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, S., Gries, S. T., & Lester, N. A. (2018). Optional that in complementation by German and Spanish learners. In A. Tyler & C. Moder (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research (pp. 99–120). New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, S., Lester, N. A., & Martinez-Garcia, M. (2014). That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English. Language and Cognition, 6, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Wulff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wulff, S., Baker, P. (2020). Analyzing Concordances. In: Paquot, M., Gries, S.T. (eds) A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics