Skip to main content

Mimesis and Myth: Evolutionary Roots of Psychological Self-Understanding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Perspectives on Imaginative Culture

Abstract

In accounting for themselves as psychological beings, humans either (1) attribute traits to the self or (2) tell stories about their lives. We examine the possible evolutionary origins of these two modes of self-understanding. Trait-based, semantic understandings of self develop from the outside in as social actors gradually come to comprehend their social reputations in groups. We suggest that this psychological challenge was first negotiated in the pre-linguistic, mimetic culture developed by Homo erectus. The subsequent emergence of language made for greater articulation and precision in the attribution of traits to the self. Moreover, language served as the main evolutionary midwife for the proliferation of storytelling among Homo sapiens, and the eventual creation of personal myths, or self-defining life stories. Individuals came to see themselves as carrying stories in their minds about their own lives, articulating a sense of a narrative self that develops from the inside out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addis, D. R., & Tippett, L. (2008). The contributions of autobiographical memory to the content and continuity of identity: A social-cognitive-neuroscience approach. In F. Sani (Ed.), Self-continuity: Individual and collective perspectives (pp. 71–84). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names, a psychological study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 1–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 825–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1996). Social adaptation and the five major factors of personality. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180–207). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. New York, NY: Pantheon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Gottschall, J., Johnson, J. A., & Kruger, D. (2016). Agonistic structure in canonical British novels of the nineteenth century. In J. Carroll, D. P. McAdams, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), Darwin’s bridge: Uniting the humanities and sciences (pp. 195–222). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The origins of narrative: In search of the transactional format of narratives in humans and other social animals. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1, 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijct.1.1.07dau

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dor, D. (2015). The instruction of imagination: Language as a social communication technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dor, D. (2017). From experience to imagination: Language and its evolution as a social communication technology. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 43, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., & Sutcliffe, A. G. (2012). Social complexity and intelligence. In J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (pp. 102–117). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, D. L. (2017). How language began: The story of humanity’s greatest invention. New York, NY: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1015–1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, T., & Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, P. L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (2006). The self. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 505–570). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. S. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 29, pp. 55–89). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1963). Psychology. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett. (Original work published 1892).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesebir, S. (2012). The superorganism account of human sociality: How and when human groups are like beehives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., & Lax, M. L. (2010). The unanticipated resilience of trait self-knowledge in the face of neural damage. Memory, 18, 918–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.524651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1993). The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 5, pp. 1–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1996). Self-knowledge of an amnesic patient: Toward a neuropsychology of personality and social psychology. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 125, 250–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2013a). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2013b). The redemptive self: Stories Americans live by (Revised and expanded edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2016). From actor to agent to author: Human evolution and the development of personality. In J. Carroll, D. P. McAdams, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), Darwin’s bridge: Uniting the humanities and sciences (pp. 145–163). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2019). “First we invented stories, then they changed us”: The evolution of narrative identity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.3.1.110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & McLean, K. C. (2013). Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–180). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. C., Pasupathi, M., & Pals, J. L. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58, 318–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., & Jensen, K. (2012). Culture and the evolution of human sociality. In J. Vonk & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (pp. 419–433). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00081061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2008). Naturalizing the self. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 421–447). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schechtman, M. (1996). The constitution of selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. (2012). The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, M. S. (2005). Reverse-engineering narrative: Evidence of special design. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 177–196). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazire, S., & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other-ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth. New York, NY: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan P. McAdams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McAdams, D.P., Cowan, H.R. (2020). Mimesis and Myth: Evolutionary Roots of Psychological Self-Understanding. In: Carroll, J., Clasen, M., Jonsson, E. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Imaginative Culture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46190-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics