Abstract
Many new and innovative forms of participation in public planning and strategy development have emerged, and they are often informal and sometimes also expressive. However, public planning is a formal activity that is largely based on written documents. The analysis presented in this chapter is based on the case study of a strategy process in a medium-sized Norwegian town. It shows that the written translation of input is limited and that important aspects for decision-making are not included. This supports the conclusion that the impressions and memories of politicians and administrators who participate in such processes should be emphasised. The analysis also suggests that these impressions and memories provide important information for assessing the impact that the innovative arenas can have on strategy decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
An exact number of participating politicians was not possible to obtain.
References
Agger, A., & Löfgren, K. (2008). Democratic assessment of collaborative planning processes. Planning Theory, 7(2), 145–164.
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.
Czarniawska, B., & Jorges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sévon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Evans, J., et al. (Eds.). (2017). The experimental city. London and New York: Routledge.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66–75.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.
Geissel, B. (2013). On the evaluation of participatory innovation. In B. Geissel & M. Joas (Eds.), Participatory democratic innovations in Europe. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Hillier, J. (2007). Stretching beyond the horizon: A multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hillier, J. (2008). Interplanary practice: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for creative experimentation in strategic spatial planning. In J. van den Broeck et al. (Eds.), Empowering the planning fields: Ethics, creativity and action (p. 43). Leuven: Acco.
Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2010). Planning with complexity. London: Routledge.
Kvalvik, K. (2018). Kommunal planstrategi—frå politikk til administrasjon? In G. S. Hanssen & N. Aarsæther (Eds.), Plan- og bygningsloven 2008: Fungerer loven etter intensjonene? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Lovdata. Plan- og bygningsloven [The Planning and Building Act]. Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-27-71
Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situation radical planning in the global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32–50.
Nyseth, T. (2011). The Tromsø Experiment: Opening up for the unknown. Town Planning Review, 82(5), 573–593.
Nyseth, T., Pløger, J., & Holm, T. (2010). Planning beyond the horizon. The Tromsø experiment. Planning Theory, 9(3), 223–247.
Nyseth, T., Ringholm, T., & Agger, A. (2019). Innovative forms of citizen participation at the fringe of the formal planning system. Urban Planning, 4(1), 7–18.
Ringholm, T., & Nyseth, T. (2018). Medvirkning. In G. S. Hanssen & N. Aarsæther (Eds.), Plan- og bygningsloven—fungerer loven etter intensjonene (pp. 317–333). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Ringholm, T., Nyseth, T., & Hanssen, G. S. (2018). Participation according to the law. European Journal of Spatial Development, 67, 1–20.
Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of management Reviews, 18(3), 290–310.
Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28.
Sim, K. E. A. (2016). The art of participation: The case of creative communities in Indonesia. Community Development Journal, 52(1), 171–185.
Smas, L., Schmitt, P., Perjo, L., & Tunström, M. (2016, June 22–24). Positioning urban labs—A new form of smart governance? REAL CORP 2016 Proceedings.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wæraas, A., & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation theory ‘translated’: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 236–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12092
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Interview Guide
Appendix: Interview Guide
-
1.
What are your experiences with the ByLab process?
-
2.
What experiences are conveyed to you from others who participated in other parts of the process than yourself?
-
3.
Is this way of designing participation useful for the planning and development work in the municipality?
-
4.
Do you think the presentation of the process and the experiences from it, as it appears in the documents, are in accordance with your impressions from participating in the process?
-
5.
Was the discussion in the local council different from discussions that you have experience from, regarding other planning contexts? If so, in what way?
-
6.
Do you see any limitations or disadvantages with these forms of participation?
-
7.
Do you have thoughts or ideas of other, new forms of participation?
-
8.
Concluding remarks.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ringholm, T. (2020). Lost or Found? Translating Innovative Participation. In: Hagen, A., Higdem, U. (eds) Innovation in Public Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46136-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46136-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46135-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46136-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)