Skip to main content

Innovation on the Planning Theory Agenda: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in Public Planning

Abstract

Mainstream planning theory has traditionally had two major perspectives: communicate and calculate (Healey, Planning Theory, 11: 188–207, 2012; Mäntysalo, Town Planning Review, 73: 417–436, 2002; Sager, Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 9: 129–147, 1992; Stein and Harper, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32: 5–17, 2012). In this chapter, we argue that contemporary planning theory should include innovate as a third perspective. Innovative planning brings a multitude of new viewpoints to the table within which theory and praxis also embrace the traditional communicate and calculate perspectives. Hence, we propose communicate, calculate and innovate as three interacting aspects of planning. This introductory chapter describes the point of departure, provides a framework for the book and briefly introduces the remaining chapters. Each of the chapters that follow contributes to the discourse on innovation in planning theory by addressing pivotal and unruly issues in ways that are applicable to both innovative planning and planning innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2016). Managing collaborative innovation in public bureaucracies. Planning Theory, 1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrechts, L. (2012). Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory, 12, 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amdam, J., & Veggeland, N. (2011). Teorier om samfunnsstyring og planlegging. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amdam, R. (2014). An Integrated planning, learning and innovation system in the decentralized public sector; a Norwegian perspective. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 19, Article 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Portland: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J., Sancino, A., Benington, J., et al. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19, 640–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahoon, S., Pateman, H., & Chen, S.-L. (2013). Regional port authorities: Leading players in innovation networks? Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, B., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation. Public Management Review, 19, 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, 949–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1966). Planning as innovation: The Chilean case. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32, 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuijen, K., Moore, M., Cederquist, A., et al. (2017). Creating public value in global wicked problems. Public Management Review, 19, 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, S., & Hillier, J. (2012). Processes of innovation: Reformation of the English strategic spatial planning system. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, A., & Higdem, U. (2019). Calculate, communicate and innovate – Do we need innovate as a third position? Journal of Planning Literature, 34, I–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (2008). The innovation landscape for public service organizations. In J. Hartley (Ed.), Managing to improve public services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73, 821–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2006). Network complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. In L. Albrechts & S. J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), The network society. A new context for planning? (pp. 146–160). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2010). Making better places. The planning project in the twenty-first century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practises. Planning Theory, 11, 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., Birch, G., Campbell, H., et al. (2000). Editorial. Planning Theory & Practice, 1, 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdem, U. (2017). Dimensions of collaborative strategies and policy innovation. Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 28, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1999). Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo, R. (2002). Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Planning Review, 73, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metze, T., & Melika, L. (2012). Barriers to credible innovations: Collaborative regional governance in the Netherlands. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 17, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10, 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). The innovation imperative in the public sector, setting an agenda for action. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Fostering innovation in the public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practise of public governance. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89, 1335–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, T. (1992). Why plan? A multi-rationality foundation for planning. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 9, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2006). Netværksstyring. Fra Government til Governance. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43, 842–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, S. M., & Harper, T. L. (2012). Creativity and innovation: Divergence and convergence in pragmatic dialogical planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teigen, H. (2007). Innovativ forvaltning. Avgrensingar og omgrepsbruk. In R. Rønning & H. Teigen (Eds.), En innovativ forvaltning? (pp. 13–43). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aksel Hagen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hagen, A., Higdem, U. (2020). Innovation on the Planning Theory Agenda: An Introduction. In: Hagen, A., Higdem, U. (eds) Innovation in Public Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46136-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics