Abstract
Proper post-processing of the prostate MRI data is crucial for readout and a successful TRUS/MRI fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate for correct diagnosis. In this chapter, we aimed to define how to do post-processing prostate MRI for planning of accurate targeted prostate biopsy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz A, Haider M, Padhani A, Villeirs G, Macura K, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033.
Weinreb J, Barentsz J, Choyke P, Cornud F, Haider M, Macura K, et al. PI-RADS prostate imaging – reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol. 2016;69(1):16–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052.
Turkbey B, Brown A, Sankineni S, Wood B, Pinto P, Choyke P. Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;66(4):326–36. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21333.
Moore C, Giganti F, Albertsen P, Allen C, Bangma C, Briganti A, et al. Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate Cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology task force. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):648–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.011.
Mazaheri Y, Hricak H, Fine S, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A, Ishill N, et al. Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: correlation with pathologic tumor volume. Radiology. 2009;252(2):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2523081423.
Rosenkrantz A, Taneja S. Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(1):109–20. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10699.
Vargas H, Akin O, Franiel T, Goldman D, Udo K, Touijer K, et al. Normal central zone of the prostate and central zone involvement by prostate Cancer: clinical and MR imaging implications. Radiology. 2012;262(3):894–902. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110663.
Mertan F, Berman R, Szajek K, Pinto P, Choyke P, Turkbey B. Evaluating the role of mpMRI in prostate Cancer assessment. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(2):129–41. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2016.1134311.
Garvey B, Türkbey B, Truong H, Bernardo M, Periaswamy S, Choyke PL. Clinical value of prostate segmentation and volume determination on MRI in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):229–33. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.13322.
Turkbey B, Fotin S, Huang R, Yin Y, Daar D, Aras O, et al. Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):W720–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9712.
Martin S, Troccaz J, Daanenc V. Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model. Med Phys. 2010;37(4):1579–90. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3315367.
Pasquier D, Lacornerie T, Vermandel M, Rousseau J, Lartigau E, Betrouni N. Automatic segmentation of pelvic structures from magnetic resonance images for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(2):592–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coskun, M., Turkbey, B. (2020). Post-processing of Prostate MRI. In: Tirkes, T. (eds) Prostate MRI Essentials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45935-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45935-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45934-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45935-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)